Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

Home
Hiring
Products
Companies
Discussion
Q&A
Users
Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

AI-observed conversations & context

Daily AI-observed summaries, trends, and audience signals pulled from Hacker News so you can see the conversation before it hits your feed.

LiveBeta

Explore

  • Home
  • Hiring
  • Products
  • Companies
  • Discussion
  • Q&A

Resources

  • Visit Hacker News
  • HN API
  • Modal cronjobs
  • Meta Llama

Briefings

Inbox recaps on the loudest debates & under-the-radar launches.

Connect

© 2025 Not Hacker News! — independent Hacker News companion.

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.

Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

Home
Hiring
Products
Companies
Discussion
Q&A
Users
  1. Home
  2. /Discussion
  3. /When the job search becomes impossible
  1. Home
  2. /Discussion
  3. /When the job search becomes impossible
Last activity 2 months agoPosted Sep 16, 2025 at 9:18 AM EDT

When the Job Search Becomes Impossible

pertinhower
283 points
448 comments

Mood

calm

Sentiment

negative

Category

other

Key topics

Job Search
Unemployment
Tech Industry
Debate intensity60/100

The article 'When the job search becomes impossible' discusses the struggles of job hunting in the tech industry, with commenters sharing their experiences and frustrations with the process.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Very active discussion

First comment

24m

Peak period

139

Day 1

Avg / period

40

Comment distribution160 data points
Loading chart...

Based on 160 loaded comments

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    Sep 16, 2025 at 9:18 AM EDT

    2 months ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    Sep 16, 2025 at 9:42 AM EDT

    24m after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    139 comments in Day 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    Sep 19, 2025 at 1:35 PM EDT

    2 months ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (448 comments)
Showing 160 comments of 448
DaveZale
2 months ago
2 replies
Hate to say the obvious, but it's all about supply and demand. The field I was working in 30 years ago was "hot" and the hourly wage has dropped at least 5x since then.

Sure, in the last 20 years I did "development" work which was related but more advanced (24 hours a day stuff, it's always in your head) - but once those efforts were complete, so were the jobs.

My field was laboratory science and I still take solace in the fact that 200 years ago, only the rich (or minimally subsidized) ever got a chance to to touch this stuff. But solace doesn't pay the bills.

Maybe take on volunteer work? Once you get involved, it leads to stories and sharing and new perspectives. I've done a few thousand hours over the past 15 years. It feels good. You chose to do it. You see results and have new ideas. Maybe even a new business.

insane_dreamer
2 months ago
1 reply
This only works if you had a good job and a decent amount of savings and no family to support.
DaveZale
2 months ago
1 reply
or a dual income household. My wife and I have taken turns on who has the jobs with the benefits. Maybe you're right, maybe we're an exception. But I know educated guys around here whose wives work, and stay home with the kids, run volunteer .org in their spare time.
insane_dreamer
2 months ago
1 reply
Right that works too. But only if a single income is high enough to keep the boat afloat for a while.
DaveZale
2 months ago
2 replies
Yes but the flip side, is that we lived in Indiana for a while. Very cheap living there. So, keep your expenses low, with no debt. Freedom.
hiring-manager
2 months ago
1 reply
TLDR:

No Debt

Lots of savings

Single-income able to support family

WIN!

insane_dreamer
2 months ago
You forgot “low COL”
insane_dreamer
2 months ago
Very key point.
tonyedgecombe
2 months ago
>Hate to say the obvious, but it's all about supply and demand.

Presumably the computer science departments will continue to churn out more supply for a while yet.

kevinleary
2 months ago
2 replies
"Sometimes the best way to search is… not to search." Last line of the article and man... it hits! All while applying and going through multiple interview processes, I was taking a break: traveling, fishing, and reading.

I was in the job search after leaving the GOV for about 3-4 months. I had received offers but they were all less pay or less flexibility than before and I wasn't willing to compromise. All the "big and sexy" start-ups required 3+ interviews, most I had was 7, and they still ended up deciding I wasn't a fit.

I reflected often that I was in the wrong line of work... not being able to get what I had wanted. With some rationalization and imposter syndrome gone, it ended up being LinkedIn and my connections that had saved me. Living proof that network and connections out last technical prowess unless you're the best-of-the-best at something.

sylos
2 months ago
And unfortunately if you don't have a network for whatever reason, you're essentially screwed. Networking is basically the only way to get there, but I don't think most of society can handle the networking requirements to be stable.
iberator
2 months ago
It's all fun when you have money... otherwise it's a recipe for disaster
SamoyedFurFluff
2 months ago
7 replies
This essay just makes me feel so hopeless about our society. I don’t feel it’s right that employment has such weight in people’s lives that the search causes psychological damage.
afpx
2 months ago
2 replies
It's tough to watch the change when not too long ago a software developer with decent skills could literally submit 5 resumes and end up with 3 good offers.
dakiol
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but that's still happening. At least it happened to me this year. I consider myself a decent developer (in every job I have landed, I was always considered the "best" in the team after not much time in the job). I'm not faang-silicon-valley level, though. I haven't written a compiler or an OS, or contributed to the linux kernel. I have read all the popular tech books out there, I do more or less know what companies (and interviewers) want to hear, and I'm easy to work with.

I'm in western europe. I think the situation in the US is way different, though. Also, for juniors (or people with less than 8-10 years of experience) is much harder, that's true.

fuzzfactor
2 months ago
The only way for anybody to have any good jobs at all is for millions to have none, and/or have nothing resembling formerly respectable pay.

And it's got to last years or there will be no recovery for shareholders from what they've already suffered with a stagnant economy.

In the 1970's it ended up 10x this bad or worse, in most technical fields at the time as well as non-tech.

There was nothing else that could be done except recognize it was a crap shoot.

There will be plenty of millions who do not lose their jobs, some will not even lose much momentum. There will be nowhere else for the "new normal" to coalesce around, after nothing else resembles the old normal for so long.

As before, only the relatively unscathed will write the economic history of these years, and many less-fortunate millions are slated to be forgotten.

The only other alternative is for everybody to take a steep pay cut, and all upwardly-mobile climbers to halt all momentum. What are the odds that could happen this time?

And that still wouldn't allow hiring as many early-career professionals as there will be available for quite some time to come.

Don't worry, employment is not where all the negative outcomes will affect future generations . . .

creata
2 months ago
4 replies
Life used to be even worse than this, though.

I know it's going to be deeply unpopular -- it always is -- but I never understood how reasonable people don't find bringing children into this world to be an act of abject cruelty.

r_lee
2 months ago
2 replies
I mean, if it's so cruel, then why wouldn't you just commit suicide?

The reason why it's not cruel (IMO) is that there's hope for a better future, if you don't have kids, you will never be able to know. That's choosing to just not play the game, total darkness. There isn't an alternative universe to choose from.

creata
2 months ago
1 reply
> then why wouldn't you just commit suicide?

I'm trying not to upset the people around me.

mschild
2 months ago
2 replies
Please, and I say this with love, seek psychological help. If that's the only thing from stopping you, you need to talk to someone.
vkou
2 months ago
This is good advice, but needs to be bookended with through research about your rights, and the consequences of discussing this with a medical professional, and all the various ways in which you can be fucked over.

Because there are some incredibly serious consequences to it.

r_lee
2 months ago
Agreed, but I would say talking to someone isn't a magical fix here.

OP, I would be interested in knowing if that's the case, why are you posting here on HN, getting up in the morning, doing the things you do etc?

Are you depressed (if so) in a physiological or psychological kind of way (because of something external?)

I will say I am not doing too well, but still, if I look at things objectively right now, I'd still rather wait and see what happens in this world rather than choosing nothingness. My rock bottom is someone's heaven

dennis_jeeves2
2 months ago
>The reason why it's not cruel (IMO) is that there's hope for a better future,

This part is correct.

>if you don't have kids, you will never be able to know.

This part is incorrect from _my_ point of view. Most people believe that they somehow live on through one's kids. I don't.

xyzzy123
2 months ago
Because otherwise all the reasonable people get replaced with unreasonable people.

Some say this has already happened...

chasd00
2 months ago
My kids are happy, thriving and optimistic about the future. For me, they bring more joy than I thought existed. Having kids is the best thing that happened to me ever and pretty they’re glad I did too. What world are you talking about?
OgsyedIE
2 months ago
You might like Ajit Varki's 2013 book which is entirely devoted to using evolutionary biology in answering that question.
pizzathyme
2 months ago
1 reply
There is something fundamentally broken about this entire user journey and industry. There are lots of jobs to fill. But hiring managers don't find people reading through resumes submitted in a form. People don't get jobs by submitting resumes into a form.

The opportunities happen from talking on the phone, meeting someone for coffee. I feel like this entire resume submission industry should just be deleted.

grogers
2 months ago
1 reply
3 out of 3 jobs that I've had after college have been from submitting resumes into a form... It's not perfect but it can work
lurking_swe
2 months ago
agreed. And guess what? I was able to get a job without a network, right out of college in 2015!

My last search was in late 2022 and I got a job with my (great) employer via an online form as well.

marginalia_nu
2 months ago
5 replies
I think a lot of people simply don't know what to do with themselves when they don't have a job.

There are many psychological needs that jobs often provide for you that you have to sort out yourself when you don't have traditional employement. This is a problem you face through unemployement, but also self-employment and early retirement.

At least in part, it's not so much not having a job as not having daily structure, not having a social context, and lacking a sense of belonging. Lacking these factors will absolutely ruin your mental well-being.

These aren't things that are impossible to find when unemployed (or otherwise not working), but if you've spent most of your life being told what to do, first in school and then at work, you've got some figuring out to do.

throwawayoldie
2 months ago
1 reply
> I think a lot of people simply don't know what to do with themselves when they don't have a job.

I would be perfectly happy without a job. It's the income I'm concerned about.

3D30497420
2 months ago
1 reply
Agreed. I have can think of about a dozen things I'd love to do if I didn't have a full-time job. Unfortunately, most cost at least some amount of money (not to mention food, a roof over my head, etc.).
throwawayoldie
2 months ago
2 replies
As a friend of mine put it, "I don't know if UBI would take people out of the workforce, but it would probably take me out of the workforce."
atemerev
2 months ago
3 replies
UBI sadly is purely a fantasy. We don't have money even for retirement funding, which shows cracks in every country. And UBI is basically a lifetime pension.
vkou
2 months ago
1 reply
We have the money, it's just flowing into making the top 5% comfortable and the top 0.0005% really comfortable.

Real estate in particular (but there are others) is a bottomless pit that society dumps money into, and speculators scoop money out of.

atemerev
2 months ago
Just try and calculate. The rich are rich, but there are too few of them. Even $1000 UBI (which is not enough for anything) is like $3.2 trillion per year. All the rich taken together do not earn this much.
ryandrake
2 months ago
3 replies
> We don't have money even for retirement funding

We only don't have it because we refuse to collect it. There is enough wealth in the world to end hunger, poverty and allow people to age to death in dignity, but we lack the political will to achieve any of these things.

t-3
2 months ago
In countries without sovereign currencies it's more complicated, but in the US money wouldn't even need to be collected (technically it would need to be collected/added as debt, but that's entirely due to the Constitution and not some kind of natural law). The only real considerations needed to spend are whether or not adding more debt is politically viable and whether or not percepetions of and expectations for inflation are manageable. A UBI would be way too big to be able to avoid triggering inflation expectations and opportunism. Ending hunger would be much more manageable as the costs are very low relative to the impact and so it could be more easily hidden from financial doom-speakers.
atemerev
2 months ago
Hunger is easy. It is housing, medicine and education that are unsolvable.

And no, even if you skin all the rich and put all their money to UBI, it will only last a year or two (you can take Excel and calculate). The bulk of income and taxes comes from the middle class.

lotsofpulp
2 months ago
Nominal wealth is useless if supply of products and services is in decline. The population histogram of pretty much all developed societies has passed the curve where the supply of labor is decreasing so that “wealth” will be competing to buy less and less labor.

US federal government alone spends trillions of dollars on wealth transfers from workers to non workers via Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, along with a few other program. And even that doesn’t guarantee you will be able to see a doctor in a timely manner.

joquarky
2 months ago
I'm also curious how UBI won't turn into the same convoluted mess that our tax laws have become. I doubt it would stay universal for long.
orangecat
2 months ago
"I don't know if UBI would take people out of the workforce, but it would probably take me out of the workforce."

A realistic UBI would be $10-15k/year, which means a crappy apartment and/or roommates and no luxuries. There's probably a margin where some people who want to do FIRE would be able to retire slightly earlier, but I can't see many people abandoning median or better paying jobs.

achierius
2 months ago
1 reply
What are you talking about? That's not the issue for most people. For most people the issue is that if you don't have a job for long enough, the government will send people to throw you out on the streets to suffer and die.
marginalia_nu
2 months ago
1 reply
I have tried various forms of non-work (including unemployment while unqualified for government aid), and the by far most mentally devastating thing I've done was to take an extended sabbatical where I really just did nothing but sit on my ass, play video games, watch netflix, and scroll social media for 8 months. Took me years to get my brain sorted again.
SoftTalker
2 months ago
This was covid for many people. And many people have not recovered and many employers are still trying to get people back to work.
jhthlajfreq
2 months ago
I don't have a job right now. I've been applying about 100 places a month. I just graduated with a phd in a quantitative field and have all the skills of an ml data scientist + my own domain expertise. And, it sucks. I am so broke. I have no money in my bank account now, maybe $7. Family helps me with rent but until then I can't bear to ask them for more money. I've been waiting on unemployment claims to process for a month now, even then the projection is around $150 a week out of that based on my former teaching income. I generally eat 1-2 meals a day these days. Some meals are things like a pile of peanuts or toast with butter. I go to bed hungry many nights. I haven't engaged in any of my hobbies since my teaching contract ended, hiking takes too much time and makes me too hungry and I can't afford to golf right now. Trying to fix my bike so I can start doing postmates with it and bring in some money to not be so dependent on other people while I am in this limbo during the job hunt. I don't have any health insurance right now. Haven't been able to see my therapist due to out of pocket costs. Routine panic attacks and anxiety. Three credit cards maxed out. Falling behind on other bills. Yeah, I'm in bad shape. Hoping things turn around for me soon. The silver lining is the jobs I'm qualified for would pay me at least 10k a month if I manage to land one. Four months of that I'll have all my debt paid off and be out of this hole.
jlarocco
2 months ago
That's a little out of touch.

Most people don't have the financial resources to be out of work for a month or two, much less indefinitely. For most people it has nothing to do with the factors you listed.

I've been laid off twice in the past and each time I was fortunate to have enough savings to take several months off of work to relax and unwind. I'd quite happily do it forever if I could afford it. I loved being able to set my own routine, tell myself what to do, and find my own social context and sense of belonging while doing activities that I enjoyed, usually having nothing to do with work, like biking, skiing, creating open source projects, etc.

But watching your bank accounts slowly tick downwards is incredibly stressful, even when you have a long runway, and each time I ended up job hunting sooner than I had planned.

dennis_jeeves2
2 months ago
>I think a lot of people simply don't know what to do with themselves when they don't have a job.

Partly true. But today there is no way to live off the land either, as people used to in the past by raising cattle and pigs. Either it's illegal or you owe the govt taxes.

OgsyedIE
2 months ago
It's just an abstracted and bureaucratic repackaging of the difficulty with searching for prey and forage during a succession of harsh seasons that some of our unluckier ancestors experienced, such as those who lived at the time of the Pleistocene Toba eruption.

To the brainstem, employment is the process of hunting for food. No employment means there's no hunting going on.

the_real_cher
2 months ago
It's less the employment and more the eating and shelter that the employment provides.
someone7x
2 months ago
In the recent UAP hearing, whistleblower Borland talked about how financial ruin is the real fear holding whistleblowers back:

> Are you scared for your safety?

> … I am not scared for my physical safety in the sense of an agency or company coming to kill me, but I have no job. My career has been tarnished. I'm unemployed. Living off of unemployment for the next three, four weeks until that's gone. So it's a complicated question.

https://www.rev.com/transcripts/house-uap-whistleblower-hear...

TrackerFF
2 months ago
6 replies
I've been thinking about job searching lately, maybe a bit too much. I'm employed, so it is not any immediate concern for me, but one has to think ahead.

Between age discrimination that starts after 50, and how difficult the job search seemingly is...some people will have to work at least until they're 70. That's a solid 15-20 years more, after the job hunting is an uphill battle.

If the work search is hard while you're at your peak, professionally speaking, how are you supposed to be stay positive after that?

Me and my partner are doing everything we can to achieve some minimum level of FIRE, just in case.

I've also accepted that sooner or later, probably the next 10-15 years or so, I'll have to accept the fact that I'm going to end up in a lifer position. If FIRE can't save my ass, I simply can't afford to hop around.

jackcosgrove
2 months ago
1 reply
It was always my understanding that software careers are shorter than other technical careers, and the higher wages compensate for this. More than compensate, if you invest early.

If by FIRE you mean retire in your 50s, I don't think that's an aspiration. That should be an expectation. You might be able to work a full career in this industry, but I wouldn't plan on it.

icedchai
2 months ago
1 reply
Most people don't have the temperament for FIRE. You have to live below your means, save a double digit percentage consistently, and invest.

And you have to do it for decades. You need to be able to tough it out through the worst of times (like the dot-com bubble, financial crisis, covid, and random political chaos like tariffs.)

You have to tune out the noise and always remember that on a long enough timeline, the market only goes up. And if you think it's "different" this time, it won't be for long.

monkeyelite
2 months ago
1 reply
And all of that is made easier by having more income.
icedchai
2 months ago
1 reply
Yes, if you can avoid the traps of life style inflation. That's easier said than done.
monkeyelite
2 months ago
Yes, it’s just very clear who the responsibility to succeed is on. And the only one to blame for failure is yourself.
raffael_de
2 months ago
2 replies
> If the work search is hard while you're at your peak, professionally speaking, how are you supposed to be stay positive after that?

Life never gets easier with age. I guess that's just something we all have to come to terms with eventually.

pmg101
2 months ago
2 replies
I wouldn't say that at all. When I think back to all the store I set by ephemeral status things like worrying what was cool or if girls liked me in my twenties .. life is definitely a lot easier now I get to just be myself.
formerphotoj
2 months ago
I don't mean to rain on your parade...just want to say enjoy it now, and remember it later. Good luck.
mythrwy
2 months ago
100% I love middle age (54).

It's not that things get easier, they don't and I realize I can't do what I could at 28 but my attitude about life has changed. Less chasing sex, less impulsive actions, less neuroticism. More contentment and acceptance. Also I have seen a lot of ways to be screwed over by now and zillion personality types and I can smell potential problems a mile away.

On the downside I took what would have been a very minor fall in my 20's a few weeks ago and my shoulder still hurts. I'm not "old" like fallen and broke a hip but I would have been fully recovered after a few days 20 years ago I think.

One piece of advice for young whippersnappers: Age comes up on you a lot faster than you think when you are young. Take good care of your body, your teeth, your gut and your mind and don't put off eating and sleeping right and losing those extra pounds. Solid, lasting relationships are worth more than possessions and status too in my opinion. Those are easier to build when you are young.

fn-mote
2 months ago
> Life never gets easier with age.

HAHAHA. I have so much more "fu" money now, it really takes a lot of pressure off. Something goes wrong? I can solve it with money. Stranded somewhere? Just pay. Friend in trouble? Help out.

3D30497420
2 months ago
1 reply
This is one of my main concerns. A lot of countries are talking about raising their retirement age, and I just think to myself, which tech company is going to hire a 68-year-old? Sure, I could transition into management, but my company just laid off a number of middle-managers and the ones left are expected to do more than just manage (code, design, etc.). So I'm not sure that's all that safe either.

I like learning new things, and I hope to continue that into my 60s (and beyond), but I have to imagine picking up new skills will get harder as I age.

Traubenfuchs
2 months ago
1 reply
> A lot of countries are talking about raising their retirement age

This is solely done to reduce/delay pension payments by pushing the old unemployed into lower social security / forcing them to live off of their savings.

No one in any industry is looking for geratric 70 year olds.

mythrwy
2 months ago
1 reply
The politician industry seems to love 70+ year olds! (But I think you have to get in at a younger age).
dmoy
2 months ago
Oh you mean for literally being a politician. Lol yea, just a very small industry. And the interview loop really sucks.
yepitwas
2 months ago
5 replies
It's been such an obvious self-own for tech workers not to capitalize on any of the multiple booms they've seen, and unionize.
apwell23
2 months ago
2 replies
employers preempted that option long time ago. h1b visa workers cannot be in an union.
vkou
2 months ago
1 reply
Less than 17% of tech workers are on H1Bs. They can't exactly scab for the other 83%.
mixmastamyk
2 months ago
1 reply
Wow, is it really ~15%? No wonder unemployment is so high.
vkou
2 months ago
1 reply
Tech unemployment was also low with similar #s of H1Bs.

Pretty sure that short term trends drive it more than long-term visa holder counts.

apwell23
2 months ago
curious how is a 'tech worker' being defined here ?
triceratops
2 months ago
> h1b visa workers cannot be in an union

There's a law that says this?

moduspol
2 months ago
1 reply
Unionizing may help some things, but it won't make it easier for the unemployed to get employed.
autoexec
2 months ago
It could help with networking and it could serve as a way to get rid of totally fake AI applicants since they aren't going to be union members.
Der_Einzige
2 months ago
1 reply
Unions drive wages down in the electronic vehicle sector by forcing pensions and dissuading RSUs. Most Tesla workers make far more than their unionized GM counterparts

Also unions are mostly there to allow the lazy low performers to coast. We already have a serious problem of this but making it hard to fire them will make everyone’s life worse.

autoexec
2 months ago
Unions don't make it impossible to fire people. As long as management does their job and documents correctly there's zero issue firing workers who aren't doing their job.
azemetre
2 months ago
We need to forgo unions and straight up legislate forms of workplace democracy. People do not have meaningful control over a massive part of their lives and if democracy is good enough for state governments, it's good enough for private enterprise.
monkeyelite
2 months ago
I’m with you on the first part. They should have capitalized.

If there was a union there would be no boom to capitalize on.

kstrauser
2 months ago
1 reply
I didn't have problems with age discrimination — I don't think — but I think because I countered it with energy and eagerness. "I'm ready to hit the ground running. Availability? Leave a laptop on my desk and I'll be there tomorrow. I'm not yet an expert in your line of business, but I've worked through 8 different industries and succeeded in each, and learning as I go is my favorite thing in the world. Let's go!"

I feel like the underlying issue is less with age and more with ossification. If you're a world expert in Visual Basic but don't want to learn that "fad" TypeScript, well, get used to being unemployed.

dymk
2 months ago
1 reply
That’s the thing about age discrimination, they don’t care that you’re eager, they care that you’re over 50. How are you supposed to demonstrate you’re not just another ossified old fart if your résumé goes straight in the bin?
ryandrake
2 months ago
2 replies
Don't put anything on your resume that allows them to guess your age. Don't include dates on your education. Leave out everything except your last 10 years of work experience. Leave out your COBOL skills. And so on...
azemetre
2 months ago
1 reply
The second they see and talk to you, they know your age...
kstrauser
2 months ago
Yeah, but hopefully you’re face to face by then and can wow them with your expertise and eagerness.
kstrauser
2 months ago
Hard agree. I used to be really good at Perl, but you won't find that on my LinkedIn anymore. Old certs for obsolete skills? Gone. The job I had 18 years ago? I'd be happy to tell you about it if it comes up, but you'll have to hear about it in person because I'm not advertising it on my resume.
monkeyelite
2 months ago
> next 10-15 years or so

That’s a long enough tech career to retire. I don’t know you, but I know that even 65 year olds with 6 million in the bank are nervous to retire.

pizzathyme
2 months ago
12 replies
> "You’ve spent several months sending out scores of carefully tailored resumes and cover letters for jobs you know you are fully qualified for and would excel at."

People should not do this. It is causing so much suffering. In my 6 jobs in my career from college internship to startups to Big Tech, I have never gotten a job from sending an application into a site. It's always been through (somehow) tracking down a person to speak to over phone or coffee, and get a referral.

A form is not going to a hire you, a person is. You need to ignore the form and talk to a person.

I wish I could put this on a billboard everywhere. It seems like many people are suffering from thousands of applications, and it makes me sad.

mschild
2 months ago
2 replies
This might work if you already have a network, but otherwise good luck getting through to people on the phone. HR will answer the generic questions, but tell you to apply online. Cold "calling" people on LinkedIn is a shot in the dark. Some people don't mind you doing it, most will ignore you.
pizzathyme
2 months ago
1 reply
If you just graduated college or have no network, you can reach out to alumni and mention that connection. Or, you can ask personal friends/family for contacts (will probably be local companies, which may be a first step job).

Or you can reach out over social media. "Hi there, I follow you on X and am just getting started in the industry. Do you mind if I ask a few research questions?" A friend of mine just used this technique to land a role in an industry where he had no contacts.

If the situation is "good luck getting through to people on the phone", then that probably means this person is not a real friend of yours, they are a stranger, and you shouldn't try. You should be reaching out to people who actually know your name, or you have a mutual friend.

nitwit005
2 months ago
Reaching out to alumni works in some cultures, but in much of the world they will universally ignore you.
Yoric
2 months ago
1 reply
You can start building a network by reaching out to alumni, former colleagues, open-source contributors for projects you're contributing to [1], etc.

Hardly ideal, but it's a start.

[1] And if you're not contributing to an open-source project, please do it, it's a great way to learn stuff, improve your CV, network and of course give back.

devnullbrain
2 months ago
1 reply
I find this kind of advice underspecified. The people struggling the most to find work are juniors: what projects are big enough that the applicant would a) know and care about them and b) get a benefit out of the network but also c) have fruit low enough for a solo junior to reach?

I tried this way-back-when and ended up submitting fixes to projects that were open source but had no real path to accepting patches from people outside the cathedral.

Yoric
2 months ago
From the top of my head: Firefox (https://codetribute.mozilla.org), LibreOffice, Gnome, ...
insane_dreamer
2 months ago
4 replies
> A form is not going to a hire you, a person is.

This is becoming less and less true.

> You need to ignore the form and talk to a person.

Unless you're lucky, this is no longer going to happen. Getting a job is now becoming much more about luck, circumstances, and who you already know, much like getting your first starring role in a movie -- not about your abilities.

pizzathyme
2 months ago
1 reply
No form is going to extend a job offer autonomously. At some point in the chain, there will be a boss, a person, who talks to you and thinks, "I want to work with this person", and decides to make the offer.

So the goal is to figure out how to get in touch with that hiring manager as the first step. Even if the form or HR "rejects" you, this person can step in say, "that's silly, I want to work with them. Send them through"

I think this charade of sending in resumes to forms is causing people so much pain. It feels like rejection and is not moving them closer to a job.

prewett
2 months ago
1 reply
> No form is going to extend a job offer autonomously.

Just wait... some time-pressed startup is going to find a killer LLM prompt that filters in exactly the people they want, and then post something on the benefits of "vibe hiring". Complete with large, well-spaced text, colored with one accent color, and several graphs of hiring spending vs. income or something.

You heard it here first!

groby_b
2 months ago
That startup is going to fold about two years in unless they're at least Series E or so.

Incompetent hiring will kill you, and hiring people that you and your team don't personally gel with is incompetent hiring.

So I see that as a self-solving problem.

bopbopbop7
2 months ago
2 replies
You need luck to have a network now?
Yoric
2 months ago
1 reply
Kinda, yeah.

My first job in the industry was in a startup that went belly down. Most of us didn't get much opportunity to network.

Thankfully, I happened to contribute to two open-source projects. One of them was a (then) obscure language called Rust and another one was Firefox. Both contributions eventually turned into career-defining moments for which I'm still reaping benefits 15 years later.

Had I contributed to Vlang and Camino instead, my career would probably have been much less satisfying.

abnercoimbre
2 months ago
Vlang catching strays made my day.
hn_acc1
2 months ago
Agreed. It's next to impossible to actually connect with people about non-work topics. Way too many possible landmines, unless you really, REALLY click about a couple of topics.
danans
2 months ago
1 reply
> Getting a job is now becoming much more about luck, circumstances, and who you already know, much like getting your first starring role in a movie -- not about your abilities.

Getting a starring role in a movie has a lot to do with abilities, not just luck and who you know.

Many companies are looking for strong mission alignment, because when it's a buyer's job market, why not select someone who has intrinsic motivation for what you are doing? Are you passionate about the problem? That is a lot like auditioning for a starring role: do you understand the character you might be playing? Many jobs - especially desirable ones - use this sort of "mission alignment" as selection criterion.

The thing that's different in software is that because the equipment needed to demonstrate technical skills is so cheap (just a computer) and trust in representations of technical experience is so low, they can test for technical skills in a way that other industries can't.

I don't think that anyone asks a civil engineer to design a bridge or a surgeon to remove an appendix to get a job.

insane_dreamer
2 months ago
The abilities is the threshold requirement - which many people have - the rest is luck and connections.
JohnFen
2 months ago
> Getting a job is now becoming much more about luck, circumstances, and who you already know, much like getting your first starring role in a movie -- not about your abilities.

That's not a new thing. It's how it's always been.

MontyCarloHall
2 months ago
4 replies
As other posters have said, this only really works if you have a network. Zeroth-order referrals (i.e. they call you) work best, first-order referrals (i.e. you know someone at the company) work decently well, and second-order referrals (you know someone who knows someone to refer you) are a guided shot in the dark.

People who have networks all know this. The issue is that a shocking number of people don't have any network at all. These tend to be the sorts of people who are either actively antisocial at work (the "coworkers aren't your friends" type) or job hop so frequently that they don't spend enough time at any single job to develop any meaningful professional, let alone personal connections.

calepayson
2 months ago
1 reply
And juniors. I’m in a masters program right now and everyone’s got a network, it just happens to be filled with poor starving grad students instead of FAANG super stars :)
josephwegner
2 months ago
2 replies
Give it time. Networks are a garden that grow over time, and moreso if you cater to them. Some of those starving grad students will be VPs in 10 years.
asa400
2 months ago
Speaking of networks, hey Joe! Clark from Belly. Hope you're doing well!
IAmBroom
2 months ago
That doesn't help them get a job this decade.
pizzathyme
2 months ago
1 reply
Unless you are a hermit, everyone has a network, even if it's small. Everyone has a few friends, a brother/sister/dad/mom/cousin, a few people in their town they know. All of those people know someone else, and that's your initial pool of job opportunities to look at.

This might not get you into your dream company. But it can get you a next job to grow from.

For one of my jobs I had no contacts in the industry so I emailed someone at the company who went to my school, mentioned we both went there, and could they meet for coffee. I then drove 2 hours to meet him. We discussed what was happening at his company, are there opportunities, and he referred me.

hn_acc1
2 months ago
Yeah, it's not exactly that simple.. I worked ~15 years at an EDA company as a SW developer, got laid off in my 50s. I had a couple of people I connected with, but both of them had already retired and moved on by the time that happened.

I moved here (the Valley) because I met my wife online. Reached out to anyone I was vaguely connected to at the time. Got a few "send me your resume", none of them were a good fit.

All the interviews I got (some good, some bad) were either from headhunters, or through LinkedIn applications. In the end, a random, "don't know this company, but they want software people" ad on LinkedIn resulted in the GREAT job I've had for 1.5 years now (about a year after getting laid off) - way better pay, better work-life balance, etc.

So applying online CAN work.

schmookeeg
2 months ago
I job hop frequently, and have a large zeroth-order network because I did good work at each one.

When I am in a hiring role, I am not flipping through memories of good times with former coworkers that I had deep and meaningful time with -- I'm thinking back to who was the verb who got ish done and will make my project a success.

em-bee
2 months ago
or you are working for small companies with people who have no (useful) connections. i worked with one for 10 years. not a single referral. a few connections from the university. nothing. they all work in small companies that are not hiring or simply have no pull to provide a meaningful reference.

looking back, the best options i got was from active networking in tech and business communities. actually, all of my jobs and clients come through that. except the most current one, which is from reconnecting to an old client, but there too the initial connection and the reconnection happened through a tech community.

add-sub-mul-div
2 months ago
2 replies
I've gotten several jobs this way, including the best jobs of my career. It's insufferable the way so many commenters here assume their experience is representative of or applicable to others. It's like if main character syndrome was a web site comments section.
detaro
2 months ago
1 reply
And of course it's the people that have a different experience than you that are insufferable, not the ones that share yours, right?
add-sub-mul-div
2 months ago
1 reply
That's not anywhere close to my point, it's not their stance I have any issue with. it's their mindset that their own stance is universal:

> People should not do this.

> It is causing so much suffering.

> I have never gotten a job from sending an application into a site.

> A form is not going to a hire you, a person is. You need to ignore the form and talk to a person.

> I wish I could put this on a billboard everywhere.

My experience is opposite to this but I'm not selling it as absolute truth or even giving it as advice at all.

mixmastamyk
2 months ago
When was your experience? Because tech hiring has largely changed with the advent of the ATS SAAS in the last few years. So far filling out apps in those systems has been a complete waste of time.
oefrha
2 months ago
Can’t even tell if this is satire. If so, good one. If not, I have no words.
tennisflyi
2 months ago
1 reply
Ridiculous. So 99% people wait in line for the pizza but you waltz up to the counter and say you know the owner? That's fucked up
mym1990
2 months ago
Hardly an apt analogy. Hiring is asynchronous, there is no line? Sometimes I go to the bar and if the bartender knows me, they’ll give me a drink on the house. Is that messed up too?
lovich
2 months ago
1 reply
Referrals by hiring managers who I have previously worked with and want to hire me aren’t even getting me a phone screen from their recruiters.

The majority of employment in tech is with large, corporate firms, and unless you are in the executive tier they all have implemented a massive amount of process to prevent bias in hiring which means that even networking has low impact on getting a job, beyond letting you know the positions even exist

ryandrake
2 months ago
2 replies
Yea, whenever someone says "Just network, bro!" they never actually fully connect the dots between networking and walking into the office on your first day of work:

Step 1: Just have coffee with a hiring manager

Step 2: Hiring manager says go check out job #41102, and submit your resume. Good luck, bro!

Step 3: [???]

Step 4: You've got an interview to ace!

Nobody ever explains the [???]. They just assume that by magic, your online submission rises to the top of the stack of 1,699 other online submissions, avoids all of HR's filters, gets to the right person in the right department on the right team, that person has the authority to pick you out of the pile, and so on... There's a lot still out of your control in this process. It's not just Networking --> Job.

mixmastamyk
2 months ago
1 reply
The ATS systems everyone outsourced to a few years ago are a big part of this problem.
tennisflyi
2 months ago
My take too
crock_smacker
2 months ago
HN has a lot of rich douchebags for which this is the case. Small circle = higher trust.

The rest of us have to figure out how best to rot in a low trust world created by these douchebags.

glimshe
2 months ago
I got my dream job by applying on their website. As a hiring manager, also interviewed many people who got theirs at other companies' websites. Networking is better but website applications used to work alright. This could have changed with AI resumes.
seiferteric
2 months ago
I know this is just anecdotal but just want to say I got my current job just applying to a job from a linkedin email. I admit I was surprised how easily and smoothly it all went actually...
PyWoody
2 months ago
> It's always been through (somehow) tracking down a person to speak to over phone or coffee, and get a referral.

Just be careful contacting recruiters directly. I know of at least one F100 that will blacklist you for pestering their recruiters. If you think ai-generated resumes are overwhelming recruiters, you should see their LinkedIn inboxes.

_DeadFred_
2 months ago
This isn't true and is horrible advice.

Use the paths available to you to get a job. Exhaust them all. If you know someone that works there and THEY track you down, yes this is good advice, great way to get a job.

tayo42
2 months ago
I've gotten 3/4 jobs by cold applying. 2 at pretty big/famous tech companies. The 1 that wasn't cold applying was through an agency.
dakiol
2 months ago
I always got my jobs applying via linkedin. It's true that I usually find the recruiter and send them a message as well saying "hey I applied to X position. let me know if my profile fits". Perhaps this extra message makes the difference? I have around 12 years of experience (5 jobs in total).

I don't really have a good network, since I have worked in different countries.

josefritzishere
2 months ago
2 replies
This is genuinely well written. Anyone know who Jeff Wofford is?
mcswell
2 months ago
His story here https://www.jeffwofford.com/wp/?p=2227 probably tells you a lot about him.
3D30497420
2 months ago
His about page: https://www.jeffwofford.com/?page_id=464
kfk
2 months ago
9 replies
I met many programmers during the boom years of software that straight out refused to develop any type of soft or managerial skills. Forget that, they even refused to maintain good relationships with decision makers (and I did this too, but only once in my carrier), left jobs in bad ways, focused on chasing salary increases every 6 months.

And here is the problem. If you have been chasing "easy" salary increases, working only on the comfortable stuff like developing tech skills, you should have seen this coming. It's very, very, very hard to maintain sharp coding skills decade after decade. Even if the job market was good, the reality is that you will eventually end up with a set of tech skills that a kid 20 years younger than you, with no family and so being able to live on lower salary, probably has too.

the_real_cher
2 months ago
3 replies
> It's very, very, very hard to maintain sharp coding skills decade after decade.

This is straight up agism and should be banned. It's like saying black people can't code as well as white people.

Carmack and Torvalds would disagree with you.

the__alchemist
2 months ago
1 reply
Would you say, broadly, concepts you disagree with or find uncomfortable should be banned? Do you think that's sufficient, or should they be criminalized as well?
the_real_cher
2 months ago
1 reply
False information targeting a group should be banned in my opinion.
dolebirchwood
2 months ago
1 reply
Or just counter bad ideas with good ideas and let the up/down votes take care of the rest.
the_real_cher
2 months ago
Thats not how it works.

If I call you an idiot I will get banned.

It's not up to you to prove you're not actually an idiot no matter if its true or not.

throwaw12
2 months ago
Wrong comparison, black vs white is racism, ageism is real
registeredcorn
2 months ago
Relax. Opinions aren't that big of a deal.

This isn't twitter. You don't need to demand a ban against the first bruise to your ego.

BobbyJo
2 months ago
1 reply
The pool of young kids that can challenge the technical ability of someone with 20 years more experience is small enough that I don't mind competing with them for employment.
Der_Einzige
2 months ago
2 replies
That’s why AI is dominated by a bunch of 40 year old gen Xers.

Oh wait, it’s not!

Zuckerberg just gave a 25 year old promising AI researcher a 300 million offer that the researcher said “No” to.

He didn’t give that to yann lecun, or yoshua bengio, or Hinton. He did it to a kid.

When I go to NeurIPS, it’s mostly grad students in their 20s who are the first authors. The professors are almost always the last authors.

20 something kids are running circles around boomers today.

azemetre
2 months ago
I don't know what this is suppose to say outside of big tech needing a massive amount of regulations and taxations to reign them in.
BobbyJo
2 months ago
I don't mind competing with a single 25 year old in a market with tens of thousands of opportunities.
Loic
2 months ago
> It's very, very, very hard to maintain sharp coding skills decade after decade.

I am at the end of the third decade, soon entering the 4th. I find it easier with the time. This is because with the experience, I can directly zero on the fundamentals of the new technology popping up and quickly see if this is just marketing or more a breakthrough.

Also, we have less diversity now, every new tech getting momentum is quickly defacto standardizing. Look at the way we run LLMs now, tons of models, 5 lines of Python, within 2 years, everything kind of standardized. You can now quickly pick up the subject (ironically, the LLM will help you there) and run with it.

It is way harder for young people, because of this FOMO, they try everything and nothing, they copy/paste what "God" GPT told them and have no understanding of how things are working in the background. For them to learn "through the stack", without experience, with the new big thing coming out every week but without the ability to judge, it is very hard. I am happy that my first website was static and cgi-bin was still a thing, happy that I learnt how to get my Fortran code to run fast on an multi-core system (yes, Sun stuff), that I was able to build relatively slowly my experience.

MontyCarloHall
2 months ago
>I met many programmers during the boom years of software that straight out refused to develop any type of soft or managerial skills. [If you’ve been] working only on the comfortable stuff like developing tech skills, you should have seen this coming. It's very, very, very hard to maintain sharp coding skills decade after decade.

It’s funny you say this. I’ve observed the opposite: even basic coding skills can atrophy extremely quickly in previously sharp developers who quit coding to go onto a management track. The devs who never quit coding are the ones who stay sharp into old age; the ones who have problems getting hired in their 50s are the managers who quit coding in their 30s, worked the same middle-management position for 15+ years, and as a result have a skill/knowledge set that’s 15+ years out of date and can't answer FizzBuzz-level questions in first-round pulse-check interviews.

harimau777
2 months ago
My experience has been just the opposite. While I developed solid technical skills, my focus was on developing soft skills. However, all the management jobs I've seen hire based on programming rather than management skills.
cess11
2 months ago
A kid twenty years younger than me is in their early twenties and they would have to be some kind of Wunderkind to have spent decades learning operating systems, networking, programming languages, business and law to the degree I have.

When I'm sixty I'll have transitioned from software on commodity hardware and clusters to electronic things but I expect people in their forties to still come to me for advice.

wakawaka28
2 months ago
>I met many programmers during the boom years of software that straight out refused to develop any type of soft or managerial skills.

Let me stop you right there. Not everyone can be a manager, mathematically speaking, especially in a downturn.

>Even if the job market was good, the reality is that you will eventually end up with a set of tech skills that a kid 20 years younger than you, with no family and so being able to live on lower salary, probably has too.

You say this as if a kid with no family has the same skills as a person 20 years older. This is not the case. Generally old workers have seen a lot more and make wiser use of their time, on top of having superior skills.

drivebyhooting
2 months ago
> the reality is that you will eventually end up with a set of tech skills that a kid 20 years younger than you, with no family and so being able to live on lower salary, probably has too

I agree.

But if they only solution is to go into management, how is the career not a pyramid scheme? For each former engineer to go into management, 5 more must take his original place. That’s clearly unsustainable.

gdulli
2 months ago
> you will eventually end up with a set of tech skills that a kid 20 years younger than you, with no family and so being able to live on lower salary, probably has too.

I was this young hotshot 20 years ago. In hindsight, the skills I had at the time were commodity or even irrelevant compared to the wisdom, life experience, and maturity that took me 20 years to develop and determine how effective I am now. You can't fake or rush those 20 years. (Even though the me of 15 or even 10 years ago wouldn't believe that statement.)

So I agree, although it wasn't really managerial skills that became important for me. It feels more intangible. I got sort of lucky that I didn't have to transition into management as I got older.

But that's not to say that many workplaces won't value the young hotshot anyway. I'm retired but if I was job searching I wouldn't really consider myself in competition with them, I'm not looking for the positions that can be done as effectively by a 28 year old. That's not a matter of job title or seniority, it's matter of finding people and positions that value or need the more subtle strengths that I find most valuable and important and interesting about myself.

marstall
2 months ago
1 reply
So for an (employed) developer like me, who is dreading the next job search, what's a "hot" profession I could train myself on so my experience in the job market over the next 15 years could be like it was in the salad days of 1996-2022?

(I'm making a pass at "learning AI" but don't feel 100% certain that demand for that will be sustainable at a high level over the next decade ...)

rwmj
2 months ago
Well, I'm currently having a hard time finding a good electrician, and the ones who I have employed in the past earn pretty generous hourly rates.

(I say this half-joking, but also I know a DBA who retrained as an electrician and was happier than ever. It's the fact he retired - early - which has put me in my current predicament.)

the__alchemist
2 months ago
1 reply
This feels like the dating market right now too.
kypro
2 months ago
Dating is unbelievably easy in some ways though. I'd argue the problem with dating today is that people don't do the hard things and instead look for love on apps and other bad places.

Dating is just a numbers game. Roughly speaking it's about maximising interactions with potential partners and taking a shot in as many of these interactions which go positively as possible.

You can game dating in your favour with a bit of strategy. Unfortunately job searches are much harder to game since you can exhaust the number of active positions for your preferred role quite rapidly. The only advice I can give on job searches is to keep your skillset as broad as possible. Specialising is good if when you find work you want to be paid well. Being well-rounded is good if you want to find work as easily as possible.

pm90
2 months ago
Throw into the mix any immigration concerns and you have a perfect cocktail for stress :)

Something seems really off about this system. At least in tech, I see a lot of open recs and hiring. Im even seeing some teams struggle to fill open recs. It should be possible to build a system that matches workers to jobs without going through this dumb and stressful process.

us-merul
2 months ago
I think the benefit of the “weird path” need not be monetary but instead a way to stay afloat of the burnout and find motivation to keep going. While I agree with many things in the article, I found in my experience that these feelings are not responsive to rational arguments, and rest doesn’t help after 6+ months when recruiters’ first questions to you are “what have you been doing since your last position?” That’s why I think the “weird” route can be a good way to answer by keeping up with new projects, etc.
usgroup
2 months ago
I think more often people cast the widest net and then filter what comes back based on “is this better than what I have”.

I’m not sure that the process the author describes is all that common in practice even if it is eminently sensible.

288 more comments available on Hacker News

View full discussion on Hacker News
ID: 45261848Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 8:14:16 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

Read ArticleView on HN
Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

AI-observed conversations & context

Daily AI-observed summaries, trends, and audience signals pulled from Hacker News so you can see the conversation before it hits your feed.

LiveBeta

Explore

  • Home
  • Hiring
  • Products
  • Companies
  • Discussion
  • Q&A

Resources

  • Visit Hacker News
  • HN API
  • Modal cronjobs
  • Meta Llama

Briefings

Inbox recaps on the loudest debates & under-the-radar launches.

Connect

© 2025 Not Hacker News! — independent Hacker News companion.

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.