Back to Home11/18/2025, 4:29:40 AM

We Can Now Track Individual Monarch Butterflies

1 points
1 comments

Mood

thoughtful

Sentiment

neutral

Category

science

Key topics

monarch butterflies

migration tracking

wildlife research

Researchers have developed a tracking sensor small enough to be carried by individual monarch butterflies, allowing for more detailed study of their migration patterns, with commenters raising questions about the potential impact of the added weight on the butterflies.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Light discussion

First comment

1m

Peak period

1

Hour 1

Avg / period

1

Comment distribution4 data points

Based on 4 loaded comments

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    11/18/2025, 4:29:40 AM

    17h ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    11/18/2025, 4:30:49 AM

    1m after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    1 comments in Hour 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    11/18/2025, 5:09:49 PM

    4h ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (1 comments)
Showing 4 comments
m463
17h ago
1 reply
I wonder if 60mg is a lot of extra weight?

Looks like monarchs weigh from 0.25 grams for smaller individuals to 0.75 grams for larger ones.

briandon
14h ago
Excellent point.

Some images in the article show butterflies and others show somebody handling a set of the BlūMorpho tags (each of which includes a long antenna) but the tags are never shown individually or separated from their packaging so that you can see how large they really are. And they aren't shown attached to any butterflies. The article mentions that tags are attached to the butterflies using "eyelash adhesive" but many readers may not be aware that most eyelash adhesive products are cyanoacrylate glue aka CA glue aka "super glue".

Searching on the name of the tag product (BlūMorpho) turned up images of the tags superglued onto various living things, including butterflies and hummingbirds. The NYT article calls the sensors "tiny" but, imho, that's an exaggeration. With the antenna, the overall length is about the same as my pinky finger and, relative to the animals onto which they're being glued, they don't seem anything like "tiny" but rather more like little weighted backpacks with long dangly bits.

It's hard for me to believe that these don't impose significant burdens (in terms of the metabolic costs from the weight and possibly changed aerodynamics as well as in possibly higher risks of predation [and general increased chances of fatal mishap due to the protruding tag and antenna bumping into things or getting snagged]) on the small creatures to which they're being attached.

A question and answer on the manufacturer's FAQ page (https://celltracktech.com/pages/frequently-asked-questions) indicates that some users attach these tags to hummingbirds using glue whereas others glue the tags to removable harnesses that they fit onto hummingbirds but I couldn't find anything about how to remove glued-on tags from hummingbirds (which have lifespans of ~3-5 years) without harming the animals.

CamperBob2
14h ago
Incredible feat of miniaturization. I have no idea how you get a Bluetooth transmitter down to that SWaP factor, and I'm not exactly a n00b at either RF or EE stuff in general.

Almost worth $200 to order one of the BlūMorpho trackers and take it apart to see how they did it.

ID: 45961407Type: storyLast synced: 11/18/2025, 4:32:40 AM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.