The semantic chaos of AI coding (and a proposed classification)
Mood
thoughtful
Sentiment
neutral
Category
tech
Key topics
AI
software development
classification
The article discusses the semantic chaos caused by AI coding and proposes a classification system to address the issue, but lacks community discussion to gauge reactions.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
3m
Peak period
1
Hour 1
Avg / period
1
Based on 1 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
11/19/2025, 12:40:34 PM
6h ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
11/19/2025, 12:43:55 PM
3m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in Hour 1
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
11/19/2025, 12:43:55 PM
6h ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
This article introduces what I call "the vibe coding trap" and attempts to bring clarity by proposing a standard classification: 4 distinct phases of AI adoption in software development.
- Phase 1: No AI (baseline)
- Phase 2: Autocomplete (Copilot-style)
- Phase 3: Conversational/Vibe Coding (for MVP/prototypes, otherwise painful)
- Phase 4: Structured AI (context engineering, specs-driven)
The terminology mapping alone might be helpful for teams trying to figure out "where are we?" and "where should we go?"
Curious: Are there any other initiatives to bring clarity about these terms?
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.