Back to Home11/16/2025, 11:02:25 AM

“The Fall of Icarus”: Photograph of a falling skydiver in front of the Sun

55 points
14 comments

Mood

excited

Sentiment

positive

Category

science

Key topics

astrophotography

skydiving

photography

Debate intensity20/100

A stunning photograph captures a skydiver falling in front of the Sun, earning comparisons to the myth of Icarus.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Very active discussion

First comment

1d

Peak period

32

Day 2

Avg / period

23.5

Comment distribution47 data points

Based on 47 loaded comments

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    11/16/2025, 11:02:25 AM

    2d ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    11/17/2025, 7:05:50 PM

    1d after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    32 comments in Day 2

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    11/18/2025, 11:34:21 PM

    10h ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (14 comments)
Showing 47 comments
dvh
1d ago
1 reply
"what comes up must come down" -- Icarus
dotancohen
1d ago
"That's not my department" said Wernher von Braun.
GMoromisato
1d ago
6 replies
This is a classic example of a simple idea that no one had ever done before. The execution was complex, of course, and Andrew McCarthy is one of the most skilled astrophotographers. But once you get the idea, a number of people could have done it--but no one ever did.

Makes you wonder what other similar ideas are out there! You can bet McCarthy is already thinking some.

p.s.: My brush with celebrity is that I saw an Andrew McCarthy post on Quora when he was first getting started with astrophotography and gave him a few tips. Always important to remember that everyone was a beginner at one point: https://www.quora.com/Are-there-any-pro-tips-for-astrophotog...

mjamil
1d ago
1 reply
Your advice there is really valuable. Thanks for providing it. I've always wondered how to post-process my night images, and this is a really good guide for that.
GMoromisato
1d ago
1 reply
Glad it helped! I definitely encourage you to continue practicing post-processing. There is a lot of magic there, and it's fun too.
pdpi
1d ago
Love that technique with splitting B&W and colour, doing processing on B&W, then recombining. It's incredibly obvious in hindsight, especially with how common it is in digital art to draw in B&W and colour "in post". A fun little egg of Columbus that I'll be having some fun with over the holidays. Thanks for the link!
nullhole
1d ago
2 replies
I had an idea for survey planes once. During calibration, they fly grid patterns, basically like a hashmark (#), to get overlapping data for comparison.

Doing that kind of flight at night (makes sense for lidar! not so much for photo..), against a clear sky with at least some stars, and stacking the resulting photos, would give you a grid pattern of green/red/white aircraft running lights in front of the heavens.

mxfh
1d ago
1 reply
The overlapping pattern is! the flight pattern. The overlap is not some calibration artifact, it is the product for any sort of stereo evaluation.
nullhole
10h ago
That is the flight pattern used on calibration flights, which is used to generate the internal/external calibration values for the camera / laser installation.

Standard wide area ortho photo collection can be done with a series of parallel lines, as long as there's enough forelap/sidelap between photos. Same for standard wide area lidar collection.

pmontra
1d ago
I happen to live at the crossing of two major flight lines, E-W and N-S, so I might actually attempt to do that. Maybe a lot of 1 tenth exposures could be enough. Trial and errors to get started, as usual.
dylan604
1d ago
1 reply
> Makes you wonder what other similar ideas are out there!

There are examples of planes silhouetting the sun or moon. There are examples of the ISS. There are examples of planets (Mercury/Venus) crossing the sun, not the moon (obviously). I think someone else mentioned rockets being captured too.

People have also done similar with the moons of other planets. And of course that's how exoplanets have been discovered by looking the effects of a planet crossing between our line of sight of its host star.

schiffern
1d ago
2 replies
dylan604
1d ago
1 reply
pests
1d ago
1 reply
I mean kinda? This thread is about a skydiver. That's a lot less consistent than the orbit of the ISS or some other satellite.
dylan604
1d ago
1 reply
It's also staged. They did it in multiple takes, and then composited out one of the takes with a mosaic of the clean sun. None of the others are composites, and none of the others got multiple takes
dmurray
1d ago
1 reply
Source for it being a composite? The article says under the headline

> This is not photoshopped. That’s really a person falling in front of the Sun.

dylan604
19h ago
From within this own topic, there are clues:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45951713

Sure, all of the elements were captured, but not in a single image released as the final image. If you look at a search for “solar transit”, none of them have as much detail in the sun as this one. That’s evidence of comping the sky diver onto his mosaic. It’s similar to when people come in a full moon over itself when captured in a wide angle image. Yes, the moon was there and it is just updated with something with more detail and better exposure, but it’s not a single image possible to capture without comping. Maybe it’s not as obvious to someone less familiar with astrophotography, but that just makes the sin that much worse.

At the end of the day, it’s a great artistic shot, but it nothing more than the same level of effort to make a modern Marvel movie

Zanni
12h ago
That lost shot (Falcon 9 transiting the sun) is my favorite. I've got a print of it in my office, waiting to be hung on the wall.
ChrisMarshallNY
1d ago
2 replies
> a number of people could have done it--but no one ever did

My personal definition of "genius," is someone who sees things from a different angle, and can express it in terms we can implement.

It's not doing well on IQ tests. It's that ability to think "outside the box."

jeswin
1d ago
2 replies
There are all types of geniuses. By confining its definition to selected variants of "outside the box", you've defined a new box in a different coordinate system.
ChrisMarshallNY
1d ago
Well … I’m not a genius.

I always did well in IQ tests, but I tend to look at things the way most folks do.

fy20
1d ago
I somewhat agree that this isn't the only definition of genius, but this is a pretty important one. If you look back at the most successful scientists, they were not just mad scientists with grand ideas, they were also able to explain their ideas in ways that other people could understand and believe it's correct science.

Turning that back to HN. You may have an amazing startup idea, but you can't do it alone. You need to convince people to join your team, investors to give you funding and customers to buy your product. Yes, even scientists need to be good in sales.

Lio
23h ago
1 reply
I remember Damien Hirst's response to people saying that anyone could have created his "The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living"[1].

He'd simply respond with "But you didn't, did you?".

I think that Hirst had a point.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Physical_Impossibility_of_...

zdragnar
18h ago
It's not like sharks haven't been preserved for display before, they just didn't call it art (barring counting taxidermy as an art form).

Then again, I'm also one of those people who thinks duct taping a banana to a wall is also not art.

ecoled_ame
1d ago
indeed!
BolexNOLA
1d ago
What a fantastic little story ha I love this. I need to get back out and do some astrophotography myself… not that I’m nearly as good as either of you (even 7 years ago lol)
cosmic_ape
1d ago
3 replies
Tbh, do not quite get the excitement around this picture. It was staged, and the stunt doesn’t appear to be particularly complex. A lot of logistics, sure. But seems like all there is to it is that someone just bothered to do it. So not clear what’s the additional value over photoshop.
mvcosta91
23h ago
1 reply
Try to reproduce it yourself, bro.
cosmic_ape
22h ago
1 reply
A lot of logistics, as mentioned. If you’d like to explain what’s in there beyond that, I’ll be glad to hear.
jeanlucas
19h ago
1 reply
the novelty, you didn't do or think of that before. It was well executed and novelty.

You can't do it, you also didn't think of it before.

What value are you adding?

cosmic_ape
19h ago
This isn't about me though. I'm just trying to understand what's interesting about this picture. You are saying that just because nobody took that particular combination before, it is enough of a reason, right?
fxwin
23h ago
2 replies
> So not clear what’s the additional value over photoshop.

I think photography might just not be for you (nothing wrong with that)

jpfromlondon
20h ago
I like photography doubly so as a craft, and forgive me if a heavily shopped stacked comp isn't making my heart quicken.
cosmic_ape
22h ago
Care to explain? I actually do take pictures with a camera from time to time.
Espressosaurus
16h ago
The difference is THEY DID IT.

Photoshop is not real.

This was real.

This was recorded.

The value is in the authenticity and execution of a cool idea no one else has done before.

criddell
22h ago
1 reply
[delayed]
FrameworkFred
19h ago
same :(
dazbradbury
1d ago
Be great to have the same shot but in front of the moon. Photos would make a stunning pair!
ZebusJesus
12h ago
Great photo for science and art at the same time!
sswaner
1d ago
Perhaps just me still carrying some latent trauma, but the upside down, legs bent moment reminded me of a picture from 9/11. Not going to link to it.
dang
1d ago
Related. Others?

I captured my friend transiting the sun during a skydive - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45919692 - Nov 2025 (12 comments)

NetOpWibby
1d ago
Deus Ex: Human Revolution intensifies
helsinkiandrew
21h ago
I think the same photographers ISS passing infront of the Sun and moon are more impressive:

https://www.demilked.com/iss-in-front-of-sun-and-moon-andrew...

almosthere
1d ago
I have to say, well done.
K0balt
22h ago
Very unique and cool image.

I was curious at first if this was planned, or if it was a bizzare coincidence… I’m not sure whether to be enthralled or disappointed. On one side is the wonderful creation of chaos, on the other is a marvel of photographic engineering.

ID: 45944158Type: storyLast synced: 11/16/2025, 9:42:57 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.