Nov 23, 2025 at 1:15 AM EST
SoX_ng
Mood
informative
Sentiment
neutral
Category
tech_discussion
Key topics
Audio Processing
Open Source Software
Command-Line Tools
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
48m
Peak period
1
Hour 1
Avg / period
1
Comment distribution2 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 2 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 23, 2025 at 1:15 AM EST
1d ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 23, 2025 at 2:03 AM EST
48m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in Hour 1
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 23, 2025 at 4:30 AM EST
22h ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Discussion (2 comments)
Showing 2 comments
Would be good to understand the relationship of this code original sox. It says it's a hard fork and integrates downstream bug fixes from code which depends on sox. What's the original sox author doing in this?
I only read the git repo text. Presumably one of the other docs or the ML discussed it.
The AUTHORS file is informative of course.
(Used sox heavily back in the day)
22h ago
Original author isn't involved with this fork AFAIK, but fixes from SoX are backported which is why the author may appear in the commit history.
ID: 46021231Type: storyLast synced: 11/23/2025, 9:45:20 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.