Back to Home11/19/2025, 2:53:28 PM

Show HN: Speaker Analyzer – Get analytics on who spoke how much in your meetings

2 points
0 comments

Mood

calm

Sentiment

positive

Category

tech

Key topics

meeting analytics

productivity tools

speech analysis

Hi HN!

We built Speaker Analyzer to solve a simple problem: after long video meetings, I wanted to know who actually spoke, for how long, and how the conversation was distributed. I found myself wondering "did I dominate the conversation?" or "who barely spoke up?" With remote teams using Teams, Zoom, and Google Meet, I can now export these transcript files and easily analyze participation patterns.

What we built:

A privacy-first tool that turns your meeting transcript files (*.vtt) into actionable speaker insights in seconds. Just drag & drop your transcript file and instantly see: - Speaking time per person - Word counts and participation percentages - Turn-taking patterns - Visual breakdowns and charts - Most active / least active participants - Export to CSV/JSON (premium)

As far as privacy: - Files are processed in-memory and never stored - Only encrypted speaker names and analytics are saved - No transcript text is retained

Sample output: https://www.speakeranalyzer.com/sample-transcript-analysis.p...

Try it: https://speakeranalyzer.com

I'd love feedback on: - What other metrics would be useful? - Any other meeting platforms to support? - UI/UX improvements

Happy to answer questions about the implementation or privacy approach!

The author is sharing a tool called Speaker Analyzer that provides analytics on speaker participation in meetings, but the lack of comments suggests it didn't generate much discussion.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

No activity data yet

We're still syncing comments from Hacker News.

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (0 comments)

Discussion hasn't started yet.

ID: 45980282Type: storyLast synced: 11/19/2025, 4:14:52 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.