Show HN: GPT-5.1 reasoning agents for hypertrophy periodization
Mood
thoughtful
Sentiment
positive
Category
science
Key topics
AI in Fitness
GPT-5.1
Hypertrophy Periodization
So I built Arvo (https://arvo.guru). It’s a "context-aware" AI coach, not just a logger.
The Problem: Standard apps use static linear progression (add 2.5kg every week). But if you are following a fatigue-based system (like Mike Israetel’s RP or Kuba), you need to autoregulate based on RPE/RIR and soreness. Most users fail to track this accurately in Excel.
The Solution & Tech Stack: Instead of if-then statements, Arvo uses a chain of specialized AI agents (powered by GPT-5 reasoning models) to act as a coach:
NLP Logger: You don't toggle complex UI buttons. You just write a note: "Shoulder hurt on bench press, RPE was 9". The NLP agent parses this, logs the RPE, flags the injury, and automatically swaps the next push exercise to a joint-friendly variation (e.g., Landmine Press) for the next session. Methodology Compliance: The logic engine respects strict rules. If you select "Mentzer HIT", it enforces low volume/absolute failure. If you select "Kuba", it manages volume accumulation. [1] * Contextual Timer: It doesn’t just count down 90s. If the protocol is FST-7, it enforces short rest (30-45s) for fascial stretch. Current Status: We are in Open Beta.[2] The backend is heavily reliant on the new reasoning capabilities of GPT-5 to handle the multi-variable logic of periodization without hallucinating absurd weights.
I’d love you to roast the landing page or try the beta. Specifically interested in feedback on the NLP parsing accuracy from any serious lifters here.
Link: https://arvo.guru
Thanks!
The post introduces GPT-5.1 reasoning agents for hypertrophy periodization, a potentially innovative application of AI in fitness training, but lacks discussion or feedback from the community.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
No activity data yet
We're still syncing comments from Hacker News.
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Discussion hasn't started yet.
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.