Not

Hacker News!

Beta
Home
Jobs
Q&A
Startups
Trends
Users
Live
AI companion for Hacker News

Not

Hacker News!

Beta
Home
Jobs
Q&A
Startups
Trends
Users
Live
AI companion for Hacker News
  1. Home
  2. /Story
  3. /Roblox Requires Age Checks for Communication, Ushering in New Safety Standard
  1. Home
  2. /Story
  3. /Roblox Requires Age Checks for Communication, Ushering in New Safety Standard
Nov 19, 2025 at 4:53 PM EST

Roblox Requires Age Checks for Communication, Ushering in New Safety Standard

urbanshaman
59 points
88 comments

Mood

informative

Sentiment

neutral

Category

news

Key topics

Online Safety

Age Verification

Gaming Platforms

Child Protection

Discussion Activity

Very active discussion

First comment

2h

Peak period

71

Day 1

Avg / period

36

Comment distribution72 data points
Loading chart...

Based on 72 loaded comments

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    Nov 19, 2025 at 4:53 PM EST

    4d ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    Nov 19, 2025 at 6:36 PM EST

    2h after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    71 comments in Day 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    Nov 23, 2025 at 3:19 AM EST

    23h ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (88 comments)
Showing 72 comments of 88
sanex
4d ago
6 replies
I've been saying we need a separate Internet for kids. Not just because of pedos, but because young adults don't have the same level of respect and filters that one should have when dealing with kids and it's exposing them to behavior they shouldn't. This is a great step.
JumpCrisscross
4d ago
2 replies
> we need a separate Internet for kids

Good start. But this still leaves them at the mercy of these tech companies.

Kids—especially pre-teens—should not have social media. There is just way too much evidence that this has harmed and is harming an increasingly class-segregated generation.

Gas stations are careful about selling cigarettes to kids. We need these developers to have even a shadow of that concern.

Aloisius
4d ago
5 replies
Today: Social media is harming our kids, ban it!

30 years ago: Video games are harming our kids, ban it!

60 years ago: Rock and roll is harming our kids, ban it!

There is little evidence to support social media causes harm. Even correlations are weak. As a large study on the subject put it, the association of well-being with regularly eating potatoes was nearly as negative as the association with [social media] use.

This looks like yet another moral panic.

hollerith
4d ago
1 reply
>the association of well-being with regularly eating potatoes was nearly as negative as the association with [social media] use.

Maybe regularly eating potatoes is a lot worse for a person that most of us currently realize. (They do have an extremely high glycemic index and high levels of oxalic acid.)

Aloisius
4d ago
Potatoes are harming the kids, ban it?

Seriously though, the correlation is just weak - far to weak to actually draw conclusions from let alone ban it.

rgregg
4d ago
2 replies
I mean.. you do you, but the data seems pretty clear. Social media use among children significantly impacts mental health in a negative way, in well designed study after study. There's a good summary out of the HHS (at least until they take it down): https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/reports-and-publications/...

You have any pointers to well designed studies that show it's as innocent as a video game or rock and roll?

Aloisius
4d ago
That Surgeon General's Advisory also warns against video games.

As did the Surgeon General in 1980 who warned kids were addicted to video games body and soul.

squigz
4d ago
> The types of use and content children and adolescents are exposed to pose mental health concerns. Children and adolescents who spend more than 3 hours a day on social media face double the risk of mental health problems including experiencing symptoms of depression and anxiety.3 This is concerning as a recent survey showed that teenagers spend an average of 3.5 hours a day on social media.4 And when asked about the impact of social media on their body image, 46% of adolescents aged 13-17 said social media makes them feel worse.5

Are those kids spending more than 3 hours a day already suffering from depression/anxiety? What would those adolescents say about the impact of their classmates/school on their body image?

> We have gaps in our full understanding of the mental health impacts posed by social media but at this point cannot conclude it is sufficiently safe for children and adolescents. We must better understand the answers to key questions, such as, which types of content are most harmful and what factors can protect young people from the negative effects of social media.

This seems to recognize a lot more nuance than "the data seems pretty clear"

(To say nothing of what even "social media" is. Is HN social media?)

blitzar
4d ago
1 reply
today: kids should be out doing drugs and having sex, not sitting on social media all day
mmmlinux
3d ago
some low birthrate countries are basically saying that already...
anonnon
4d ago
30 years ago: leaded gasoline and lead-containing paint is harming our kids.
loloquwowndueo
4d ago
Dude no, sorry, those things have nothing on Roblox, it’s the most toxic damaging thing ever.
bilegeek
4d ago
Problem is some kids don't have alternatives to online. Just recently on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45945114

Not saying you're wrong, but it's more complicated than you think in many cases. The rot goes deep into society as a whole, which tech corpos then exploit.

rjdj377dhabsn
4d ago
1 reply
No, we don't. You need to teach your kids the skills to deal with the realities of the modern world before giving them unrestricted access to the internet.
sanex
3d ago
Yeah let me explain racism and all the swearing from these degenerates who can't behave themselves around children.
samename
4d ago
1 reply
I agree that separating kids from adults is an improvement, but I disagree this is a "great step" due to the mechanism. Using a child's biometrics is a horrible step. Why can't this just be done with parental controls? We should not normalize games collecting biometrics on children. I don't expect them to keep the data safe or to not abuse the data.
sanex
3d ago
1 reply
Yeah parental controls is probably the optimal solution. Biometrics makes me uncomfortable as well. They say they're deleting it immediately but do you trust them? I know better than to trust in anything being deleted.
samename
23h ago
They only claim to delete the picture an video, so I don’t the biometric will be deleted since it’s not mentioned
Hizonner
3d ago
2 replies
> I've been saying we need a separate Internet for kids.

That is moronic. And destructive.

Children are human beings, and are supposed to get a chance to grow naturally into being community members. That is an incremental process. Not everybody does all the parts in the same order, nor at the same rate. And you don't suddenly snap from being a "child" into being an "adult", and reboot all your human connections in that moment.

You don't mature at all without interacting with some adult role models (not just seeing them from afar, and not just seeing the parts people want to show you). No, your parents are not enough. You also need to interact with slightly older, and substantially older, non-adults. The tight age cohort isolation produced by schools is already destructive enough to social development.

Children are also entitled to have access to information and activities, just like everybody else. And, no, not all of that would somehow get duplicated into your child ghetto.

And it means absolutely nothing that people "used to do that just fine without the Internet". That was before everything was done via the Internet.

> Not just because of pedos, but because young adults don't have the same level of respect and filters that one should have when dealing with kids and it's exposing them to behavior they shouldn't.

Get a fucking grip. Kids can handle knowing about behavior you don't like. They can handle knowing about really bad behavior. They can handle seeing what older people do,and what the consequences are. In fact, that is essential to the development of their own values and capacity for self-governance.

If you raise somebody in a box until the age of 18, don't be surprised if they can't deal with the outside world when you force them out of it.

sanex
3d ago
1 reply
Lol you think your average internet gamer is a ROLE MODEL. My god what a joke. I've never heard worse things in my life than in a call of duty lobby and we don't need children exposed to that level of hatred when they're still innocent.
Hizonner
3d ago
Why do you hang out there then? And why is it the first thing you think of when you think about a giant worldwide information network?

I try not to think of everybody who plays video games as an arrested adolescent in Mom's basement, but it's kind of hard. Especially with the "Lol" stuff.

engineer_22
3d ago
1 reply
Your opinion is unsettling. You seem to conscientiously ignore the vulnerability of young children. To the contrary you advocate for the violation of their innocence. For the love of all that is good I hope your opinion remains a lonely minority.
sanex
3d ago
1 reply
I am going to assume it's the ignorance of a twenty something who is far away from becoming a parent.
Hizonner
3d ago
Try sixty-something with an adult child.

There is a disease going around among the "youngsters" who are parents these days. I'd call it overprotectiveness, but it doesn't actually protect anybody, just stunts them and actually makes them vulnerable. What it is is what's known as a purity spiral, a dangerous form of groupthink in which people compete to be the most extreme.

kachapopopow
4d ago
while yes, they probably should, however, it wouldn't protect them from pedos.
Natsu
4d ago
We had AOL back in the day, but...
gambiting
4d ago
2 replies
Does that help with any of this?

https://hindenburgresearch.com/roblox/

"Following years of scandals, we performed our own checks to see if the platform had cleaned up its act. As a test, we attempted to set up an account under the name ‘Jeffrey Epstein’…only to see the name was taken, along with 900+ variations. Many were Jeffrey Epstein fan accounts, including “JeffEpsteinSupporter” which had earned multiple badges for spending time in kid’s games. Other Jeff Epstein accounts had the usernames “@igruum_minors” [I groom minors], and “@RavpeTinyK1dsJE” [rape tiny kids]. We attempted to set up a Roblox account under the name of another notorious pedophile to see if Roblox had any up-front pedophile screening: Earl Brian Bradley was indicted on 471 charges of molesting, raping and exploiting 103 children. The username was taken, along with multiple variants like earlbrianbradley69. After we found a username, we listed our age as “under 13” to see if children are being exposed to adult content. By merely plugging ‘adult’ into the Roblox search bar, we found a group called “Adult Studios” with 3,334 members openly trading child pornography and soliciting sexual acts from minors. We tracked some of the members of “Adult Studios” and easily found 38 Roblox groups – one with 103,000 members – openly soliciting sexual favors and trading child pornography."

BoredPositron
4d ago
3 replies
No but look how hard they try and now they have a feature they can wiggle around with if something bad happens. It's theater as always with stuff like this. There is just no way of doing it without real inconvenience for every user. Inconvenience really hurts the bottom line...
wizzwizz4
4d ago
1 reply
There's no cheap way of doing it without inconvenience for every user. Rather than age checks, they could just remove the CSAE distribution groups, appropriately moderate abusive conduct, and so on. HN has basically no restrictions whatsoever, and it's hardly a hive of scum and villainy: it's not fundamentally difficult to accomplish this, you just have to put the work in.
DANmode
3d ago
HN doesn’t have a young, ignorant community to exploit.

It’s mostly the positive-direction moderation that makes HN immune to the infiltration.

miohtama
4d ago
Fort Gayers want their limelight back

https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-11258407

DANmode
3d ago
What do you expect, Roblox and other large internet services to hire commandos?

If the FBI gave a shit about these groups being squashed, and people being roped, they would be.

Fuck Roblox, but point the finger on ineffective tracking of child exploitation networks where it belongs.

squigz
4d ago
1 reply
I've been on the Internet for 20 years and have seen ... a lot of it.

I have a hard time believing groups of 103,000 members on one of the largest game platforms are "openly trading child pornography"

DANmode
3d ago
1 reply
So go look.

Check Telegram, Matrix, and anywhere on the internet basically,

for more of the same.

squigz
3d ago
You can find people openly trading CP anywhere on the Internet, huh?
crtasm
4d ago
1 reply
So besides scanning your child's face they also want access to their phone contacts.
chris_wot
4d ago
You can thank the Australian government for this change in direction.
xeonmc
4d ago
2 replies
Roblox calling themselves the industry gold standard in online safety is about as ridiculous as Riot Games calling themselves the beacon of technical excellence in game development.
retrochameleon
3d ago
If anyone deserved the title "Beacon of Technical Excellence in Game Development," I'd like to nominate Embark Studios
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF
3d ago
I can't find it now, but I recall an article written by someone who worked with Disney on an online game for children called Hercworld. Apparently, Disney had a rule for interaction which became known as "the Disney standard" at this shop: no child shall be harassed even if they do not know they are being harassed.
jswelker
4d ago
5 replies
The most impressive thing about Roblox is how many predatory parties they have managed to pack into one children's platform. The company itself with its microtransactions, cash hungry creators with lowest common denominator and/or sexualized content, creepy adults behaving badly, probably some hostile foreign governments in all likelihood. Maybe add in a 4chan integration next just to cover a wider spectrum of villainy.
stocksinsmocks
4d ago
6 replies
There are parental controls that don’t seem to do much good at all. I set a filter so that my 6-year-old son would only see content that was rated for kids. The next thing I know I see he’s playing a prison riot simulator and having a shootout with the police. There were some appropriate games, but the screening just isn’t serious. When it’s game time, we pretty much stick to Mario and offline Minecraft.
antonymoose
4d ago
1 reply
I don’t think it’s serious in any platform of any scale. I remember having some pedo on AOL try to groom me as a 7(?) year old, except I was aware enough to punch out of the situation very quickly. The kind of thing basic keyword filters could have flagged and caught.

Similarly, I remember my families account being banned because I dared to say “Santa isn’t real” in a chat around the same timeframe.

Very serious administration for a billions dollar firm…

jswelker
4d ago
1 reply
Hmm maybe the answer is that there should be no anonymous online platforms targeting children at all.
debugnik
3d ago
The problem is that verifying adulthood for the remaining online spaces risks making them non-anonymous as well.
ch2026
4d ago
1 reply
It’s almost like age-appropriate is subjective. Roblox is primarily concerned with child safety when it comes to communication, and less about dictating what’s appropriate and not appropriate for arbitrary ages.
viraptor
3d ago
1 reply
> Roblox is primarily concerned with child safety

It's not. In every possible context, it's not concerned with that.

NickC25
3d ago
Isn't Roblox owned by a publicly traded company? No shit they aren't concerned with child safety, that would cut into profits, which would make shareholders deeply upset.

Won't anyone think of the poor shareholders?

a_bonobo
4d ago
1 reply
I've implemented the per-day time limit and it's just broken? It's very hard to measure how much time has been spent on the day, their measure is often above the limit I set, and sometimes a low limit will trigger immediately.

It seems like the limit and time measurement is based on the US time zone alone, not the local time zone. We're in Australia and that's the only explanation I can think of.

password4321
4d ago
1 reply
If you're interested in a technical solution, Amazon Kids+ on Kindle seems to enforce time limits reasonably well, except for the camera.
a_bonobo
4d ago
Thanks :) I've gone back to just being vigilant, regular parenting; often joining the games myself. I can recommend 99 Nights In the Forest, nice simple survival-style game with very little in-your-face-monetization.
concinds
3d ago
2 replies
A 6 year old with internet access? Allowed to play multiplayer online games? Please tell me I'm hallucinating.
debugnik
3d ago
1 reply
You aren't, but you might have woken up from a decade long coma. This isn't new at all.
concinds
3d ago
Surely it's rare? "Abnormal"?
stocksinsmocks
3d ago
We can’t all be Mennonites. I wasn’t much older than that when my family got dial up Internet, and somehow I made it.
password4321
4d ago
Also, disabling chat is insufficient because some Roblox experiences re-implement their own chat and ignore the parental controls setting.
hedora
4d ago
Be sure not to pay for switch online. They bury a bunch of social media / data sharing opt-ins about halfway through the game, where parents will not discover them. (Look for Luigi to see if your kid opted in.)
hedora
4d ago
1 reply
Now they’re trying to normalize mandatory “turn on the camera to access porn” services. Really?!?

As a parent, all I want is for the fucking thing to let zero people that I have not approved communicate with my kid in any way. This especially includes people that made games and gambling dens.

Also, influencers.

DANmode
3d ago
Stop giving them internet-access devices.
poemxo
4d ago
1 reply
4chan would be looking in the wrong direction since it has nothing for kids. Other games and game-like experiences are probably just as bad as Roblox and just haven't been brought out into the light. I personally remember Gaia Online being pretty bad back when I was a teen.
jswelker
4d ago
Sure, but how many kids are currently hooked on Gaia Online? (Or 20 years ago for that matter?)

I will happily complain about these other just as bad games when I discover them, don't you worry ;)

tclancy
4d ago
Truly. My daughter and her friends play a lot on it but only a few games and I always have an ear out for which ones because it’s such a cesspool.
ksynwa
4d ago
There are hostile foriegn governments in Roblox? What for?
samename
4d ago
2 replies
This is deeply concerning. No parent should be letting their kids faces be scanned with this. They claim to “delete” the image a videos after the scan, but make no mistake, the signature is saved and will be used to track the child online for the rest of their life. We need to have better protections around biometrics. Surveillance is not the solution we want.
ranger_danger
4d ago
1 reply
> the signature is saved and will be used to track the child online for the rest of their life

Source:

nothercastle
4d ago
Discord leak
poemxo
4d ago
This is a threat model that needs to be discussed more. When you share personal information in a way linked to your identity, you should be aware that that link will exist forever. Can you trust custodians of your data forever?
rgregg
4d ago
2 replies
It'd be nice if they'd do some simple common sense things - like give you a report of which games were being played and provide parental controls around which games can be played. It shocks me (but not really) that they haven't done this.
xeonmc
4d ago
1 reply
They are held back by the exact same technical obstacles that prevented Google from adding the ability to disable YouTube Shorts on your child’s account.
kgwxd
4d ago
> ability to disable YouTube Shorts on your child’s account

Can I disable it on my account!?

ch2026
4d ago
If you have a parental account this is all available for a while now: You can see which games your child plays, full chat history, and who they chat with.

And you can block them from interacting with specific games or users.

dbg31415
4d ago
Remember, Roblox is toxic and exploits young people.

- Roblox Isn't a Game | Psychology Today // https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/video-game-health/20...

- Investigation: How Roblox Is Exploiting Young Game Developers - YouTube // https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gXlauRB1EQ

- Roblox Pressured Us to Delete Our Video. So We Dug Deeper. - YouTube // https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTMF6xEiAaY

Roblox is Darker Than You Think (ft. Ruben Sim) - YouTube // https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av03P5D11PQ&t=55s

16 more comments available on Hacker News

View full discussion on Hacker News
ID: 45985799Type: storyLast synced: 11/22/2025, 9:19:11 AM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

Read ArticleView on HN

Not

Hacker News!

AI-observed conversations & context

Daily AI-observed summaries, trends, and audience signals pulled from Hacker News so you can see the conversation before it hits your feed.

LiveBeta

Explore

  • Home
  • Jobs radar
  • Tech pulse
  • Startups
  • Trends

Resources

  • Visit Hacker News
  • HN API
  • Modal cronjobs
  • Meta Llama

Briefings

Inbox recaps on the loudest debates & under-the-radar launches.

Connect

© 2025 Not Hacker News! — independent Hacker News companion.

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.