Back to Home11/19/2025, 5:44:30 PM

Native Debugging for OCaml Binaries, written by AI

2 points
2 comments

Discussion Activity

Light discussion

First comment

N/A

Peak period

2

Hour 1

Avg / period

2

Comment distribution2 data points

Based on 2 loaded comments

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    11/19/2025, 5:44:30 PM

    2h ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    11/19/2025, 5:44:30 PM

    0s after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    2 comments in Hour 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    11/19/2025, 6:04:53 PM

    1h ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (2 comments)
Showing 2 comments
wagerlabs
2h ago
Debugging native OCaml code used to be painful because the compiler didn’t emit DWARF data. LLDB had no idea where your source lines or variables were. With DWARF v5 support, the compiler now includes proper debug info — line mappings, symbols, and variable names — so LLDB can actually follow your code.

A small LLDB Python plug-in reads OCaml values at runtime and prints them in a readable form: lists, tuples, closures, strings, etc. It follows DWARF location lists to track where each variable lives and uses the runtime headers to decode them. The `p` and `ocaml_vars` commands work like normal LLDB commands but understand OCaml values.

It’s not complete yet (records and variants still show as tuples), but it makes debugging native OCaml code straightforward. You can finally set breakpoints by source, inspect locals, and understand what’s in memory without switching to disassembly.

wagerlabs
1h ago
I didn't write a single line of code in this PR but I carefully shepherded it to completion over the several days.
ID: 45982416Type: storyLast synced: 11/19/2025, 7:17:56 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.