Microsoft executive closes replies after Windows 11 "Agentic OS" backlash
Mood
heated
Sentiment
negative
Category
tech
Key topics
Windows 11
AI
Microsoft
A Microsoft executive faced backlash for describing Windows 11 as an 'Agentic OS', prompting them to close replies. The term sparked controversy, likely due to its implications for AI-driven OS behavior.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
15m
Peak period
30
Day 1
Avg / period
30
Based on 30 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
11/14/2025, 8:22:00 PM
4d ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
11/14/2025, 8:37:01 PM
15m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
30 comments in Day 1
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
11/15/2025, 4:39:29 PM
3d ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
I binned Windows 11 recently (only kept it around for gaming) because I didn't like the direction it was clearly going (and has been for a while - including their shoehorning of AI into everything when I don't want it or need it) and don't game enough that I care much any more.
For the first time since the 80's I'm not running a Windows OS on any of my machines.
I doubt they'll care, I'm one user of hundreds of millions but I don't have to consider whether every update is going to turn on something I don't want/hate so I care.
The linked video (via a linked post) from Dave Plummer does indeed sum up my feelings pretty well - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTpA5jt1g60
And, FWIW MS's gaming-business is around 10% of its revenue, which is likely to be slowing soon:
- Valve made Steam OS (aka Proton) run on ARM architecture in addition to x86, and Valve also releasing a Steam OS PC to play Windows Games on in addition to its pioneering Steam Deck + clones (https://www.windowscentral.com/hardware/virtual-reality/valv...)
- Cross-platform title releases are happening more and more frequently, with MS / XBox owned studio games being released on PlayStation
The AI guaranteed I will never touch MS again, and recently switched when it did expire.
"No ethical consumption" under capitalism or whatever; every tech company has their finger in the pie. sigh
I'm slightly worried about the Linux Kernel and whether AI features pushed by NVidia, and MS in particular, will get brought in.
It got out of my way and acted as a nearly frictionless layer between the user and the programs.
I'm usually a cross OS/platform guy. Using each for what they are good at. But lately Win11 has just felt like it's not bringing anything to the table except pain. Especially with Steam making linux so attractive for gaming lately.
https://gs.statcounter.com/os-version-market-share/windows/d...
I'm trying to switch to desktop linux these days. It's way better but still a few kinks relative to my windows7 experience but if they get there I'm done with Windows for personal stuff, hopefully work as well some day.
It even has a complete dark mode.
Android games done with NDK are made with the same APIs available on GNU/Linux, studios don't make them available on GNU/Linux as it isn't worth the additional development costs in QA and support.
* One with Windows 7 level of features (with Windows 11 level security fixes).
* One with all the bells an whistles that gives product managers the feeling of having done something and justifies their raises and career advancement.
But they only sell the second one to regular customers. IoT LTSC is for companies only. Other customers don't deserve respect apparently.
I'm presently in planning meetings with them to move the desktops from Windows 10 to Linux, and run Intuit over RDP in quarantined Windows 11 VMs.
These are people are the most conservative type of user you can imagine. One of the silent cores of staunch Windows users.
They approached me about migrating to Linux on the desktop.
What were the reasons they gave? I’m glad to hear this anecdote.
Fortunately I can easily run a herd of Windows VMs on a single server without much trouble.
Maybe it’s just that I’m old and crotchety but we need regulation to debundle everything, including phones. Yes iCloud, so forth no longer is bundled with a phone you have to choose the providers you want and those providers have to compete and no the Apple company isn’t allowed to make its phone work better for its own products. Just like Microsoft once upon a time wasn’t allowed to make its OS work better for its own browser (how quaint).
Every company eventually loses its soul. And this is how it becomes truly visible to the public at large - by pissing off those who advise and influence others.
God dammit!
4 more comments available on Hacker News
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.