Layoffs Hit Highest Level for the Month Since 2003
Mood
skeptical
Sentiment
negative
Category
other
Key topics
The number of layoffs in October hit its highest level since 2003, with the tech industry leading the way, sparking concerns about the job market and the impact of AI integration.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
38m
Peak period
58
Day 1
Avg / period
29.5
Based on 59 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 9, 2025 at 2:15 PM EST
17 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 9, 2025 at 2:53 PM EST
38m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
58 comments in Day 1
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 10, 2025 at 3:15 PM EST
16 days ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
If it helps anyone who is looking- when I was laid off 4 years ago, I took a seasonal Oct-Jan delivery job with UPS just to get out of the house, get some income and keep busy. They call them PWDs and it's $46 an hour, you use your own car and do package delivery. Your car and clothes get DISGUSTING - turns out packages are completely filthy- definitely put a tarp down - and you will be dog tired at the end of the day, I was doing 200-285 packages per shift- but it was good income and kept me busy. Also they offered to convert me to full-time warehouse after the holiday season but by then I had placed back into an industry job.
I think they call them SSDs now but same thing: https://www.jobs-ups.com/us/en/seasonal-support-driver
I'd add that I know a fair number of people who are not necessarily in coastal cities but are adjacent to them that have been exiting. They're mostly somewhat older and pretty comfortable or just have other things going on in their lives. The reality for some is that this isn't a terrible time to exit if you're not really loving things any longer and maybe have some other stuff you'd like to work on--or just retire.
Of course, modern condos will likely be cheaper but now you're paying HOA fees each month.
And, although the Bay Area is a bit of an outlier because geography, there are plenty of coastal cities where you can get to, not inexpensive by the standards of some regions, but not "insane" unless you absolutely feel you need to live in the central city areas.
Is the pay location dependent or has it just gone way down? That link shows three near me, but only paying a rather paltry $23/hr.
That's not much more than something like Walmart, which is likely a much less strenuous job with way less wear and tear on your vehicle(and body).
https://www.reddit.com/r/UPS/comments/z0bpne/advice_for_a_ne...
https://www.reddit.com/r/UPS/comments/zu6x8n/first_year_pvd_...
https://www.reddit.com/r/UPSers/comments/1gdypb6/working_as_...
https://www.reddit.com/r/UPSers/comments/18jxcd5/ssd_center_...
Honestly, if I were hit by lack of work, I would see how much runway savings I have and then try to either take some time off, to spend with family, do some low-budget traveling, learn new professional skills I wanted to learn, try to change the niche I work in and/or contribute to some open source project.
Also, doing the deliveries kind of sucked so much (lol) that it was highly motivational to network with recruiters which is how I got back in industry.
There's definitely more optimal uses of time for a layoff but I wasn't utilizing them hence this was perfect for me at the time!
which has more info and did the original work. suggest swapping link for this post. would also pay some money to never see this awful site again on HN. by the time you scroll to paragraph 3 the screen is 50% filled with shoe ads and other random shit
There are many modes and methods for interacting. I, personally, am not fond of the dragonwriter method. I'm sure it has its place, but it's just not for me.
Also, you're holding it wrong.
The AI bubble being the only thing holding up aggregate economic numbers is widely acknowledged, and this is just one of many manifestations of that.
> intertwined with two wars, one genocide,
There are more than two wars and one genocide happening now, so that's a really weird insertion.
(where one-on-one means one worker's relationship to a chain of command, a department for compensation & benefits, ownership, board, and a network of investors & advisors coordinating on compensation, hiring practices, regulatory politics at a national level)
– Henry Ford, Ford Motor Company
Its what an economic slowdown outside of AI gets us, mostly, but yes, unbridled capitalism (with, among other things, neither unionization in the industry under consideration nor strong public protection of labor rights) magnifies that (it also, to be fair, magnifies the upswing in employment on the upward side of the business cycle, but, it also magnifies the adverse consequences of unemployment on either side.)
Or is this more about senior people not being able to find ~100k a year jobs as easily?
The value of money and especially the dollar is getting printed away to worthlessness.
Certainly a trailer home in a lot of places but then not clear how easily you'll get that $50K/yr job.
Whether this is sustainable remains to be seen, there was a big outsourcing trend back in ~2004 in the tech industry here that ended up being somewhat short-lived as many companies realized those efforts were costing them more than they were saving them beyond the short term. Whether or not this time is different with the added AI component, I have no idea. I wouldn't bet on it in either direction.
Its not great out there for senior developers either, but on the senior side its more of a freeze (try not to lose your job because the next one may be very hard to find) whereas on the junior side its more of a clear contraction (keeping your job will be much harder, finding a new one harder still).
In any case, my impression is that juniors are being hit the hardest. They're the easiest to offshore and the easiest to justify as being replaceable by AI (regardless of how true that actually is).
One very real factor that actually does act as a gravitational pull for doing layoffs in Oct/Nov Q4 is insurance elections. Waiting until January can create a lot of complicated paperwork and cost more. There is also very much a sense that doing layoffs before the holidays, while giving severance pay, is more humane than waiting, because they can "spend time with family" (real words I've heard stated).
It used to be true, but companies seem deadset on demoralizing their workforce as much as possible.
They've raised prices as much as consumers will bear.
We're getting near the physical limits of how efficient things can get in many sectors.
If P/Es are to remain this high (and they have to for the rich to remain this rich), the profits must continue to grow far in excess of the total economy.
The only orange left to squeeze is labor costs.
I think we are at the point where tech companies have tested layoffs from unimaginable to on a regular basis and are willing to lay off more employees for the pursuit of this fantasy called "AGI" which actually means a 10% increase in mass global unemployment.
It doesn't matter if you are in tech, what matters is that your (tech) job is no longer safe.
Technology continues to lead in private-sector job cuts as companies restructure amid AI integration, slower demand, and efficiency pressures. In October, the sector announced 33,281 job cuts, up sharply from 5,639 in September. For the year, Technology firms have announced 141,159 job cuts, up 17% from the 120,470 announced through the same period in 2024."
https://www.challengergray.com/blog/october-challenger-repor...
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.