Not

Hacker News!

Beta
Home
Jobs
Q&A
Startups
Trends
Users
Live
AI companion for Hacker News

Not

Hacker News!

Beta
Home
Jobs
Q&A
Startups
Trends
Users
Live
AI companion for Hacker News
  1. Home
  2. /Story
  3. /LAPD helicopter tracker with real-time operating costs
  1. Home
  2. /Story
  3. /LAPD helicopter tracker with real-time operating costs
Nov 21, 2025 at 5:11 PM EST

LAPD helicopter tracker with real-time operating costs

polalavik
227 points
273 comments

Mood

informative

Sentiment

neutral

Category

other

Key topics

Law Enforcement

Surveillance

Real-Time Data

Aviation

Discussion Activity

Very active discussion

First comment

19m

Peak period

76

Day 1

Avg / period

39

Comment distribution78 data points
Loading chart...

Based on 78 loaded comments

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    Nov 21, 2025 at 5:11 PM EST

    2d ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    Nov 21, 2025 at 5:29 PM EST

    19m after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    76 comments in Day 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    Nov 23, 2025 at 10:19 AM EST

    16h ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (273 comments)
Showing 78 comments of 273
bronco21016
2d ago
1 reply
Ad in the bottom left covers the UI when expanding the menu out.

I'm sure it depends on screen resolution etc but I'd love to be able to click links to the data sources.

Overall an interesting idea. I'd love to know the data source for the cost of the operation of the aircraft. Would be really interesting to connect a database of all aircraft types then present the ability to watch the cost of like "all American Airlines flights currently flying" or "all US military aircraft".

polalavik
2d ago
sorry probably got covered by the ad - data source is the hourly from the city controller https://controller.lacity.gov/landings/lapd-helicopters which says $2,916 per flight hour
ripberge
2d ago
5 replies
As someone who lives in central LA and has them circle my neighborhood frequently, actually shaking my house, I think this is awesome.

These needs should be filled by drones. Way less noisy, dangerous and expensive.

polalavik
2d ago
1 reply
why LA is spending thousands/hour when drones exist is crazy.
tcdent
2d ago
3 replies
You're talking about technology that's only become realistic in the last couple years. Even then, there's probably nothing off-the-shelf that would serve the current need.

LAPD has been patrolling with helicopters for decades. I have yet to see a drone follow a car in high speed pursuit down the 5 at 100+ MPH.

kevin_thibedeau
2d ago
2 replies
The MQ-8 would be cheaper to operate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_MQ-8_Fire_Sco...

robotnikman
2d ago
Pretty sure these can't be bought by municipalities. Would make more sense to operate them though.
scottyah
2d ago
In what way would that be cheaper to operate? You'd just replace a pilot with a few pilots and a few teams of software engineers. Maybe fuel savings?
digdugdirk
2d ago
2 replies
On the other hand, I have seen drones chase down F1 cars at 100+ MPH...

Realistically though, I agree with your sentiment. Solving this would drones would require a constant flock of something more akin to Predator drones.

The better question is - why do we allow high speed pursuit chases in the first place?

hatthew
2d ago
As far as I'm aware, high speed drones tend to have quite short flight durations due to battery limitations. Drones that have the range to follow a fleeing suspect for a long time would probably have to be big enough that they could cause a fatal accident if they crash, and in that case I'd rather have a pilot on board. Better reaction time, no risk from jamming, much better field of view/awareness, decades of testing, etc.
tcdent
2d ago
> why do we allow high speed pursuit chases in the first place?

AFAIK they've changed their tactics in recent years, but growing up around LA these we're like sporting events on TV. It's a guilty pleasure, but almost everyone I know tuned-in and watched the chase.

asdff
2d ago
1 reply
Why do we need to follow a car in a high speed pursuit and force it to go 100mph on uncontrolled streets is the better question
sokoloff
2d ago
The person “forc[ing] it to go 100mph” is in the car being chased.
monkaiju
2d ago
1 reply
Idk, having a bunch of government surveillance drones doesn't really sound great... Maybe we just don't need this level of surveillance at all?
autoexec
2d ago
It's absolutely worth looking at the ROI on these flights and weighing that against the intrusion on our privacy/freedom. No doubt they'll always need drones and helicopters but I'd be surprised if there was any real need for them to be in the air that often. I think that's a question that should be asked everywhere but the LAPD in particular are terrible enough that it makes this a great place to start.
DiscourseFan
2d ago
1 reply
Couldn’t someone take out the drones pretty easily?
autoexec
2d ago
That depends on the drone. There are drones/UAVs that fly so high in the air you can't even see them seeing you from the ground. Even low flying drones would be very hard to hit from a car involved in a high speed chase, and it's not as if people can't shoot at helicopters which are both larger/easier targets and much more dangerous if brought down.
kylehotchkiss
2d ago
2 replies
Down in SD at least, the sheriff's office helicopters serve many purposes. They'll use them for firefighting, hike rescues (often! according to their IG), first responder to an aviation accident, loudly shouting garbled messages through their loudspeaker, etc.

There's just enough high-speed/timely crime here that I prefer they use these over drones. There's some extra legal protections built into helicopters that drones don't get, like prison time if some idiot points a laser pointer.

asdff
2d ago
LAPD doesn't conduct rescue operations or anything like that. Different helicopters are used from different agencies.
VerifiedReports
2d ago
I seriously doubt that physically rescuing hikers or delivering first-responders to plane crashes represent a large percentage of LAPD helicopter missions. I live in a nice suburb and there's one of them circling over it probably weekly.

I don't see why large drones can't do most of what these helicopters are doing. They're using needlessly expensive helicopters, too.

whalesalad
2d ago
I was in Santa Monica - the dense part with all the alleyways - during a foot pursuit involving a heli. Felt like I was in vietnam. It was at night, they were pretty low, and that light felt like the sun coming into the building.
0xbadcafebee
2d ago
1 reply
https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/audit-says-lapds-use...

  On average, the city spent an average of $46.6 million on the program, the audit disclosed. It also found that there is limited oversight or monitoring of the division, its policies and practices and whether the program is in line with the city's safety needs. [...]
  The department has 17 helicopters and over 90 employees. [..] The city operates their helicopter fleet on a nearly "continuous basis" [..] The total translates to more than $2,900 per flight hour. [...]
  Additional findings in the audit disclosed [..] 61% of the flight time was in fact dedicated to low-priority incidents like transportation, general patrols and ceremonial flights — like a fly-by at a local golf tournament, roundtrip transportation of high-ranking LAPD officers between stations and passenger shuttle flights for a "Chili Fly-In."
throwaway5465
2d ago
$5 per person per year then. Or, the price of a can of coke per person per month.

Much of which flows directly back into the local economy through wages spent and maintnance paid.

dsamarin
2d ago
1 reply
Would using drones nowadays end up being much less expensive but with all the same necessary capabilities for police work?
analog31
2d ago
1 reply
What are the necessary capabilities? My city has no helicopters or drones. There's a medical chopper that flies over my house regularly, but it has an obvious purpose.
TOMDM
2d ago
2 replies
Being able to follow a car involved in a hit and run and intercept them when they stop without restoring to what could be a dangerous police chase.

Aerial surveillance has it's place.

autoexec
2d ago
> Aerial surveillance has it's place.

It does, but I would be very surprised if the LAPD knew its place or cared to keep it there to prevent it from wandering into places that are totally unnecessary and expensive invasions of our privacy.

asdff
2d ago
Unfortunately standard practice for LAPD is to engage in a dangerous police chase along with the helicopter, not to simply follow with a helicopter.

They don't really use them for hit and run. How could they? Think about how fast that crime occurs and how much time will pass between that incident and vectoring a helicopter, which might be tied up on other work.

Less than 20% of hit and run cases are even solved in California (1). I'm sure the rate is even lower in a city like LA.

1. https://attorneyatlawmagazine.com/legal/opinion/dragged-and-...

nonameiguess
2d ago
1 reply
My first question was how much of this is labor, and from the chart provided at the bottom of the helpful link provided elsewhere (https://controller.lacity.gov/landings/lapd-helicopters), it appears to be around 60%.

I was wondering because I remember the last time I lived in Los Angeles in 2009 I went to a Lakers championship parade and talked to one of the cops assigned to crowd control, and asked about it when a helicopter flew overhead. She told me it's a great job a lot of them try to get because even 20 years ago they were starting out at something like $215,000 a year and were not expected to have any flight experience. The city just trained up regular patrol officers and tripled their pay.

asdff
2d ago
The way they fly you can tell they don't have a lot of flight experience. Really low compared to news choppers following the same pursuit. Juvenile even, at times (1-4)

1. https://old.reddit.com/r/LosAngeles/comments/1oolm68/lapd_he...

2. https://www.threads.com/@kilodelta/post/C5m373ZOX9Q

3. https://preview.redd.it/jcfdph3aiczf1.jpeg?width=1164&format...

4. https://preview.redd.it/dl7lqa2blbzf1.jpeg?width=1206&format...

citizenpaul
2d ago
1 reply
Roughly a dollar a second which if you are a theater kid you know is about $31,536,000 mil a year.

Honestly not that bad considering it provides a real service. I mean how much does the city spend on lawsuits against corrupt cops and other employees. According to the budget something like $300 MILLION on lawsuit payouts last year alone.

Who gives a $hit about the helicopters. Build an app that tracks the employees causing these lawsuits that are still keeping their jobs.

asdff
2d ago
People know what to do to get away from the helicopter and they have been successful at it. Two chases in one week this past august the suspect shook off the helicopter and got away. It is as easy as driving under an overpass or into protected airspace. In one case this past month, they followed a suspect all the way into san diego and allowed them to cross the border into Mexico where they were lost.
BadBadJellyBean
2d ago
6 replies
I find it interesting that the question is "why don't they use drones". My question is: why so much air surveillance? I live in Germany. The only times I hear a helicopter is if someone is being rescued or if someones missing. I rarely see them at all.
shoddydoordesk
2d ago
6 replies
There are high speed police chases (100mph+) in Los Angeles — no exaggeration — on an almost daily basis. Air support is the primary defense tool for law enforcement.

It's so bad that the local TV stations have their own choppers and a dedicated on-screen UI tailored for the chases with GPS-based tracking and speed.

If you're lucky you can catch one of the many YouTube live streams. Here's one from....two days ago: https://www.youtube.com/live/uGiJU-FlpdE

stefan_
2d ago
4 replies
I mean in most other places people have simply realized that unless there is an immediate risk to life, the only thing high speed police chases do is create that very risk.

Nicely contrasts with all the news about the omnipresent license plate scanners - it's just pointless, don't take the risk, arrest them at your leisure.

shoddydoordesk
2d ago
2 replies
So your proposal is to just let the criminals run away? And that somehow won't embolden them further?

"Once this baby hits 88mph, we're home free!"

Air support is used to coordinate with law enforcement up ahead to deploy spikes to end the chase.

You are just repeating empty political talking points that simply don't work in the real world.

mapt
2d ago
Basically, letting them run away and then setting up a raid at their house the next morning is safer for everyone. If you can follow them from altitude well enough to do that, you reduce risk dramatically relative to either interception or chase.

> They could learn a few things from the Georgia State Patrol, the undisputed world champions of the PIT.

Why not just open up on them with antitank weaponry? PIT maneuvers are extraordinarily dangerous, especially at high speeds.

bluedino
2d ago
A lot of departments terminate chases very early
sokoloff
2d ago
In many cases, the driver is not associated with the plates, with the car and/or plates being stolen.
TravisLS
2d ago
Worth noting that many people who run from the police also have fake or stolen plates.
dylan604
2d ago
John Oliver recently did a segment on police chases

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVFXUkFx5Y8

asdff
2d ago
2 replies
They get away from time to time from the airship. Two in one week this past august and I don't think they ever caught the suspects. One drove under an overpass and fled on foot, the other entered LAX airspace which requires waiting on clearance from ATC and got away somehow after that. I don't know why they don't just shoot a magnetic dart at the car with a gps tracker on it.
efnx
2d ago
2 replies
It would have to be a very special dart. Cars are mostly aluminum and foam. A piercing dart would be dangerous and a magnet would really work.
Esophagus4
2d ago
These exist!

https://www.thedrive.com/news/police-tag-fleeing-cars-with-g...

https://www.starchase.com/products/vehicle-mounted-gps-launc...

asdff
2d ago
Outside certain high performance cars, most cars have steel body panels.
Aurornis
2d ago
2 replies
> I don't know why they don't just shoot a magnetic dart at the car with a gps tracker on it.

Hitting a car going 100mph with a magnetic dart that and getting it to hit on a metal part, not a window or trim, and specially a steel panel, is not easy at all.

mapt
2d ago
There's a lot more aluminum than steel on car exteriors these days.
asdff
2d ago
OK, one with a big glob of bubblegum on it then.
dilippkumar
2d ago
1 reply
> There are high speed police chases (100mph+) in Los Angeles — no exaggeration — on an almost daily basis.

How is anyone driving at that speeds in LA traffic?

dylan604
2d ago
Like an asshole. We've all seen them, even if not in a chase. It may not be 100mph+ the whole time, but when there's open air, they'll get there.
BadBadJellyBean
2d ago
1 reply
Then why do you have so many car chases? That seems like an odd problem. There must be a reason.
ripberge
2d ago
1 reply
I have only been to Germany once, but my assessment was that we have a very different population here.
BadBadJellyBean
2d ago
Possible but it seems like the chases are not even a US problem but more a "certain places" problem. I genuinely wonder what the cause of this behavior is.
JLO64
2d ago
Personally I prefer Fox 11's coverage of these chases. The guy they have up there is fun to listen to and always sprinkles in comparisons to past chases.
chrisweekly
2d ago
I wonder how much of the high-speed chase "scene" is actually fuelled by all the hoopla. (TV broadcasts of soccer/football matches tend not to show streakers on the field for this reason)
embedding-shape
2d ago
3 replies
Where in Germany though? Helicopters tend to be more popular to use for various purposes in very densely populated places, like Hong Kong or New York City, but you don't really see them much in rural areas except for emergencies.
Semaphor
2d ago
1 reply
I live in a pop 200k city, hospital copters are a daily occurrence. Police? Never seen one, Hamburg, one of our biggest cities, apparently has 3.
rootusrootus
2d ago
1 reply
Same for me. I live in a pop 1M city in America. Hospital choppers are fairly common. Police choppers rare.

Also, according to the tracker, there's only one airborne in LA right now, and it is a pretty large city. It's close to 100x bigger than a 200k city.

Semaphor
16h ago
It’s not that much bigger than Hamburg, though. But I guess Hamburg is denser.
BadBadJellyBean
2d ago
In a big city. Not rural at all.
c0balt
2d ago
At least for Berlin I can attest that helicopters, outside of the yellow ones for emergency care, are a very rare occurrence. I have yet so see a police helicopter outside of a large demonstration.
Aurornis
2d ago
2 replies
> I live in Germany. The only times I hear a helicopter is if someone is being rescued or if someones missing. I rarely see them at all.

Same for me, but I live in America.

The specific location matters a lot. The LA area is more population dense and bigger than might be obvious.

To put it in perspective, the GDP of the LA area is about 1/4 as much as the GDP of your entire country.

littlestymaar
20h ago
> The LA area is more population dense

LA is absolutely not “dense” by any European standard though.

rootusrootus
2d ago
> bigger than might be obvious

That's underselling it a bit, IMO. You can look at an aerial map and observe that it's pretty big, but experiencing it in person ... it's enormous. It just goes, and goes, and goes, and goes ...

h14h
2d ago
I suspect it has something to do with LA's large footprint. Comparing to where I'm from in Chicago, LA county is over 4x the land area with less than 2x the population:

https://www.comparea.org/r122576+r396479

Don't know how the math works out exactly, but if they don't have the workforce to cover their patrol area with squad cars, there's probably an argument to be made for covering gaps with areal support. Given that Chicago struggles with workforce shortages, I can only imagine how much worse it'd be if you had to cover 4x the area with half the tax base.

asdff
2d ago
They bought them and spent a lot of money on supporting infrastructure and are therefore compelled to use them when they chase a middle aged drunken homeless man through a neighborhood.
potato3732842
2d ago
It's not about results per dollar. It's about sending a message.
VerifiedReports
2d ago
1 reply
Looks like there's supposed to be a map, but it only loads the very top edge... occasionally redrawn.

Hm, now on reload it shows a whole map... but if you zoom in it resets it and zooms out by itself at intervals.

andy99
2d ago
Seconded, I thought it was just me
ninininino
2d ago
2 replies
This is neat but also has serious implications for criminal enablement.
polalavik
2d ago
1 reply
no it doesnt. this data is public all over the place. most notably https://www.flightaware.com/
ninininino
2d ago
Cool. And yours is simpler and doesn't require looking up what the identifiers are for LAPD in particular. Just own it.
asdff
2d ago
Why? Helicopters already are on ADS-B.
maxbendick
2d ago
Living in LA, the LAPD helicopter noise really is incessant.

It's hilarious to hear flying cops try to be intimidating through when dispersing illegal concerts or singling individuals out in non-violent crowds. It's impotent posturing and an obvious waste of money. They really don't need to send 5 squad cars and a helicopter for noise complaints.

I will say though that the loudspeaker on those things are surprisingly clear, even through the buzzing of a helicopter.

LeoPanthera
2d ago
This doesn't seem to work properly in Mac Safari. The map is blank except in a thin stripe at the top.
asdff
2d ago
This was circulating recently and is sort of funny:

https://old.reddit.com/r/LosAngeles/comments/1oolm68/lapd_he...

LAPD flies quite recklessly especially downtown, where they aren't even clearing the buildings. News choppers fly much higher, well over the skyscrapers, and have no problems getting very tight shots on whatever subject there is down there.

If you follow them on ADS-B you see they really aren't used that frequently at all for calls and end up in holding patterns with nothing to do really before flying somewhere else for a new holding pattern, until their shift is up presumably.

burnt-resistor
2d ago
Blue Thunder wasn't just B-movie conspiracy theory paranoia porn but also contained a warning about technology authoritarianism and invasion of privacy, and police over-militarization.
rimbo789
2d ago
This is the kind of government waste that needs to be highlighted. Police forces consume a massively disproportionate amount of resources from our cities.

195 more comments available on Hacker News

View full discussion on Hacker News
ID: 46009591Type: storyLast synced: 11/23/2025, 12:07:04 AM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

Read ArticleView on HN

Not

Hacker News!

AI-observed conversations & context

Daily AI-observed summaries, trends, and audience signals pulled from Hacker News so you can see the conversation before it hits your feed.

LiveBeta

Explore

  • Home
  • Jobs radar
  • Tech pulse
  • Startups
  • Trends

Resources

  • Visit Hacker News
  • HN API
  • Modal cronjobs
  • Meta Llama

Briefings

Inbox recaps on the loudest debates & under-the-radar launches.

Connect

© 2025 Not Hacker News! — independent Hacker News companion.

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.