Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

Home
Hiring
Products
Companies
Discussion
Q&A
Users
Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

AI-observed conversations & context

Daily AI-observed summaries, trends, and audience signals pulled from Hacker News so you can see the conversation before it hits your feed.

LiveBeta

Explore

  • Home
  • Hiring
  • Products
  • Companies
  • Discussion
  • Q&A

Resources

  • Visit Hacker News
  • HN API
  • Modal cronjobs
  • Meta Llama

Briefings

Inbox recaps on the loudest debates & under-the-radar launches.

Connect

© 2025 Not Hacker News! — independent Hacker News companion.

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.

Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

Home
Hiring
Products
Companies
Discussion
Q&A
Users
  1. Home
  2. /Discussion
  3. /Judge Orders Google to Share Search Results to Help Resolve Monopoly
  1. Home
  2. /Discussion
  3. /Judge Orders Google to Share Search Results to Help Resolve Monopoly
Last activity 3 months agoPosted Sep 2, 2025 at 4:39 PM EDT

Judge Orders Google to Share Search Results to Help Resolve Monopoly

mikhael
33 points
8 comments

Mood

skeptical

Sentiment

negative

Category

other

Key topics

Antitrust
Google
Monopoly
Debate intensity60/100

A judge has ordered Google to share its search results to help resolve a monopoly case, but commenters are skeptical about the ruling's effectiveness and potential impact on major US companies.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Light discussion

First comment

2m

Peak period

5

Hour 1

Avg / period

2

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    Sep 2, 2025 at 4:39 PM EDT

    3 months ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    Sep 2, 2025 at 4:42 PM EDT

    2m after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    5 comments in Hour 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    Sep 3, 2025 at 2:46 AM EDT

    3 months ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (8 comments)
Showing 8 comments
coro_1
3 months ago
1 reply
So much for losing Chrome browser. Was there ever reality to this to begin with. Or was it all extracted sensationalism.
philipallstar
3 months ago
This really doesn't seem like a good idea. If people like the idea of browser independence they just need to stop brigading Ladybird with frivolous nonsense[0].

[0] https://hyperborea.org/reviews/software/ladybird-inclusivity

ChrisArchitect
3 months ago
[dupe] Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45108548
ivape
3 months ago
I’m not sure why Apple is moving up with it, technically they will have to give up the 20b search deal.
nextworddev
3 months ago
Bullish
nsriv
3 months ago
https://archive.is/Bh8JU
poisonborz
3 months ago
The problem in the end is political. There is no political willingness to punish major US companies.
holowoodman
3 months ago
> Google plans to appeal, and the case is likely to be mired in the courts for years.

So after the appeals, the ruling will be even more toothless than it already is...

View full discussion on Hacker News
ID: 45108727Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 7:35:46 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

Read ArticleView on HN
Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

AI-observed conversations & context

Daily AI-observed summaries, trends, and audience signals pulled from Hacker News so you can see the conversation before it hits your feed.

LiveBeta

Explore

  • Home
  • Hiring
  • Products
  • Companies
  • Discussion
  • Q&A

Resources

  • Visit Hacker News
  • HN API
  • Modal cronjobs
  • Meta Llama

Briefings

Inbox recaps on the loudest debates & under-the-radar launches.

Connect

© 2025 Not Hacker News! — independent Hacker News companion.

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.