Back to Home11/13/2025, 7:55:26 PM

I captured my friend transiting the sun during a skydive

43 points
12 comments

Mood

excited

Sentiment

positive

Category

other

Key topics

photography

skydive

astronomy

The author captured a stunning photo of a friend transiting the sun during a skydive, and the community is praising the achievement and the resulting artwork.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Moderate engagement

First comment

2h

Peak period

10

Day 1

Avg / period

4

Comment distribution12 data points

Based on 12 loaded comments

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    11/13/2025, 7:55:26 PM

    5d ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    11/13/2025, 9:56:40 PM

    2h after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    10 comments in Day 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    11/17/2025, 9:14:00 PM

    1d ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (12 comments)
Showing 12 comments
tetris11
5d ago
1 reply
Atheros
5d ago
2 replies
So.. it's a composite and .. "transiting" isn't quite accurate either. hmmm :-(
snypher
5d ago
1 reply
>The sun in the background was sharpened via a stacked image but the image is 100% real and authentically captured in camera (see the video in the OP reply for real time view). Not a composite!

He just kept shooting the sun after the jumper cleared, and stacked up those shots. I think saying it's a 'composite' devalues the image and just makes it seem like he cut out the jumper and pasted on to the sun.

Atheros
4d ago
It does devalue the image indeed. He didn't cut out the jumper and paste it onto the sun but he did take images of the sun and paste them onto the jumper, using the jumper as a mask. Which seems to me like a distinction without a difference.

If his images were real they would have shown the powered paraglider too. The images are a composite of photos that he took of the sun and a frame from the video that he took of the jumper.

Is it pretty? Certainly! It's art! But it's 'photography' the same way the 'So Yummy' YouTube channel is cooking.[1]

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6abePkXncCM

JohnnyLarue
5d ago
2 replies
This is like saying long exposures don't count because they're composite images
Atheros
4d ago
1 reply
That doesn't make any sense. Did you mean double exposures?
tetris11
4d ago
1 reply
Isn't a long exposure one where you leave the aperture open for a long time, but it still constitutes as a single take?
Atheros
4d ago
Yes

Even multiple exposures of one frame of film is, as far as I can tell, still generally considered one photograph.

bangaladore
1d ago
I disagree.

All photos have an exposure time; that's an inherent property of them (think film). Compositing images digitally on top one another is not an inherent property of photos.

You can double expose film, and I think that's a finer line, but I think the distinction most people care about is really analog vs digital.

4ndrewl
5d ago
Incredible.
kridsdale1
5d ago
What an achievement.
tanseydavid
5d ago
Love it. The concept and the execution. Just bought one for my new place.
ID: 45919692Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 6:04:12 AM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.