Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

Home
Hiring
Products
Companies
Discussion
Q&A
Users
Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

AI-observed conversations & context

Daily AI-observed summaries, trends, and audience signals pulled from Hacker News so you can see the conversation before it hits your feed.

LiveBeta

Explore

  • Home
  • Hiring
  • Products
  • Companies
  • Discussion
  • Q&A

Resources

  • Visit Hacker News
  • HN API
  • Modal cronjobs
  • Meta Llama

Briefings

Inbox recaps on the loudest debates & under-the-radar launches.

Connect

© 2025 Not Hacker News! — independent Hacker News companion.

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.

Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

Home
Hiring
Products
Companies
Discussion
Q&A
Users
  1. Home
  2. /Discussion
  3. /Guidelines for User Age-Verification and Responsible Dialogue Act (Guard Act) [pdf]
  1. Home
  2. /Discussion
  3. /Guidelines for User Age-Verification and Responsible Dialogue Act (Guard Act) [pdf]
Last activity 29 days agoPosted Oct 28, 2025 at 10:18 PM EDT

Guidelines for User Age-Verification and Responsible Dialogue Act (guard Act) [pdf]

hedora
9 points
3 comments

Mood

skeptical

Sentiment

negative

Category

other

Key topics

Age Verification
Online Safety
Legislation
Debate intensity20/100

The 'Guard Act' bill proposes guidelines for user age-verification and responsible dialogue, sparking concerns among HN users about its implications on online freedom and potential ineffectiveness.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Light discussion

First comment

2m

Peak period

2

Hour 1

Avg / period

1.5

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    Oct 28, 2025 at 10:18 PM EDT

    29 days ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    Oct 28, 2025 at 10:20 PM EDT

    2m after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    2 comments in Hour 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    Oct 29, 2025 at 2:03 AM EDT

    29 days ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (3 comments)
Showing 3 comments
Terr_
29 days ago
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6149...

> [The] Secretary of Commerce [...] shall establish a pilot program [...] for providing a secure digital identification credential to individuals who are citizens and lawful residents of the United States at no cost to the individual.

> [By] uploading copies of government-issued and other forms of identification (such as records issued by an educational institution), or by validating the authenticity of identity information provided by the individual using electronic records of State departments of motor vehicles, the Internal Revenue Service, the Social Security Administration, State agencies responsible for vital records, or other governmental or professional records providers that the Secretary determines are able to reliably assist in the verification of identity information.

On the other hand, it has some provisions that I'm surprised and pleased to see, since I was expecting something a lot worse:

> 7.(B)(3)(B) [Allow users to] control what data they choose to allow the pilot program to share with a social media platform, without sharing copies of the underlying verification documents or any information that the user does not affirmatively agree to share with those social media platforms.

> 7.(B)(4) Not retain copies of underlying governmental records after verifying the information provided by the user.

> 7.(B)(5) Provide users with the ability to disable or delete their secure digital identification credential and any associated records kept by the Pilot Program at any time.

> 7.(B)(5) Keep no records of the social media platforms where users have verified their identity using a secure digital identification credential, other than aggregate data that is anonymized so that it cannot be linked to individual users.

SilverElfin
29 days ago
Chipping away at anonymity and privacy. Soon this verification process will become normalized in unexpected places. What’s with the name though? “Responsible Dialogue” immediately makes it seem unconstitutional, if it’s intentional is to manipulate speech. But I don’t see the words “responsible” or “dialogue” appearing elsewhere in the PDF.
hedoraAuthor
29 days ago
This would effectively ban software that lets you run AI locally, or to access it anonymously.

I don’t see how it would be possible to provide AI services in educational contexts, or to teach kids how to use AI-based tools.

View full discussion on Hacker News
ID: 45741862Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 8:07:50 AM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

Read ArticleView on HN
Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

AI-observed conversations & context

Daily AI-observed summaries, trends, and audience signals pulled from Hacker News so you can see the conversation before it hits your feed.

LiveBeta

Explore

  • Home
  • Hiring
  • Products
  • Companies
  • Discussion
  • Q&A

Resources

  • Visit Hacker News
  • HN API
  • Modal cronjobs
  • Meta Llama

Briefings

Inbox recaps on the loudest debates & under-the-radar launches.

Connect

© 2025 Not Hacker News! — independent Hacker News companion.

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.