Back to Home11/13/2025, 10:46:26 AM

fuckborderradius.com

26 points
35 comments

Mood

thoughtful

Sentiment

mixed

Category

tech

Key topics

UI/UX design

CSS

web development

Debate intensity70/100

The website fuckborderradius.com sparked a discussion on the use of border-radius in web design, with some users praising its benefits and others criticizing its overuse. The debate highlights the tension between design trends and personal preferences.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Very active discussion

First comment

23m

Peak period

35

Day 1

Avg / period

35

Comment distribution35 data points

Based on 35 loaded comments

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    11/13/2025, 10:46:26 AM

    5d ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    11/13/2025, 11:09:42 AM

    23m after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    35 comments in Day 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    11/13/2025, 9:56:46 PM

    5d ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (35 comments)
Showing 35 comments
marginalia_nu
5d ago
2 replies
My gripe with border-radius is that it makes everything look the same.

I'd really like more corner types. Back in the tables and sliced images days, we'd have all manner of neat angular borders, and tons of variety. Now it's all squircles everywhere.

pointlessone
5d ago
You might be delighted to learn that upcoming `corner-shape` is fixing that.

Also you still can use your sliced images with `border-image`.

wincy
5d ago
You can use negative border radius to get some interesting shapes
lifthrasiir
5d ago
1 reply
Apparently made by Twitter handle @getifyX: https://x.com/getifyX/status/1935001870658851288
nrhrjrjrjtntbt
5d ago
1 reply
kragen
5d ago
Much appreciated!
yakshaving_jgt
5d ago
1 reply
If we’re going to fuck something, it should be something more consequential like JIRA.

https://ifuckinghatejira.com/

kragen
5d ago
1 reply
How about somebody you love? Or at least find wildly attractive and can trust?
yakshaving_jgt
5d ago
I wouldn't have the heart to subject them to Jira.
viraptor
5d ago
1 reply
I know it's overused and for example in MacOS introduces way too much white space, but people like rounded shapes. They make people more comfortable and make them think the content is simpler than when they get hard angles. It's been tested in so many research papers and the basically all agree - people like bouba more than kiki, whatever the context is.
kragen
5d ago
1 reply
For me the great benefit of rounded shapes is that they make it visually apparent what's foreground and what's background. If you just divide an area up into rectangular subareas, it's hard to know which of these rectangles are supposed to represent figure and which are just empty background. The T-joint between a vertical line and a horizontal line gives no clue as to whether the vertical line is supposed to connect to the left half of the horizontal line, the right half, both, or neither. A little curvature makes it clear which direction the edge of a depicted object is continuing.
chriswarbo
5d ago
1 reply
I prefer bevels for that. In particular, I grew up with the Amiga's "3-D look" where embossed = interactive and recessed = informative https://archive.org/details/amiga-user-interface-style-guide...

On a similar note, fuck the "flat" designs which make buttons indistinguishable.

I've even seen UIs which do use bevels on buttons; but only when hovered-over! I don't want to scan my pointer across the screen hoping to find something interactive, like I'm struggling on Monkey Island!

kragen
5d ago
Bevels are indeed very helpful for that. Mystery-meat navigation has been a UI design problem for a long time.
_kush
5d ago
3 replies
Border radius has been one of the best things to happen to CSS. If you've done web development during the Internet Explorer 6 era, you'd know what I mean.
viraptor
5d ago
1 reply

   <table><tr><td><img src="top-left-corner.gif" ....
slater
5d ago
You're missing valign="top" in your TD
arscan
5d ago
Was that the 3x3 table method, or was that for earlier browsers?
chriswarbo
5d ago
Border-radius makes it easier to implement rounded-rectangles, etc. compared to the tables-of-offset-image-sprites they needed back in the day.

That says nothing about whether rounded-rectangles are "good" or "bad" though.

jstummbillig
5d ago
1 reply
Everything in the real world is rounded to some degree. If anything, it's more weird that boxes on a screen should be the exception.
kyriakos
5d ago
With this reasoning even boxes on screen as rounded at some degree
Gualdrapo
5d ago
1 reply
I mean, the very bible of all things usability has redesigned its website and they put rounded corners almost everywhere.

https://www.nngroup.com/

kragen
5d ago
You're right, they didn't use to have rounded corners: https://web.archive.org/web/20131201025758/http://www.nngrou...

That was when border-radius already existed.

Of course their older designs didn't have rounded corners because that would have required using images, which would have made the page load slowly: https://web.archive.org/web/19990222172600/http://www.nngrou...

solatic
5d ago
1 reply
Ninety-degree angles do not exist in nature. So you're going to get two schools of thought: UI should look more natural (and therefore round off any hard edges), or UI should intentionally embrace hard edges, as a declaration of defiance against entropy, just like any other human endeavor for industry, progress, stability, and reliability.

We used to build systems that we wished would stand the test of time. Now we build systems that only last as long as PMs care about them and their warranty period runs out. What do our design choices say about us?

OisinMoran
5d ago
1 reply
May I introduce you to Bismuth?
kcplate
5d ago
1 reply
…which doesn’t look “natural” because of it’s crystals form close to 90 degree angles.
chriswarbo
5d ago
1 reply
That's circular reasoning (which is ironic, given the subject at hand).
kcplate
5d ago
The point is that it’s rare to see it in nature, so our minds tend to think that they are not natural.
OisinMoran
5d ago
My contribution to the genre: negative border radius.

Let's make the (digital) world sharper

https://x.com/TheOisinMoran/status/1846417247075459235

onion2k
5d ago
Open devtools and add `html * { border-radius: 6px; }` to make this site look lovely.
nrhrjrjrjtntbt
5d ago
Microsoft Metro Design fan?
virajk_31
5d ago
We like border radius, because we were forced to.
kragen
5d ago
I wonder whether they want to fuck the Fernández–Guasti squircle, Lamé's special quartic, or both, and whether their desires extend to higher-dimensional sphubes. Possibly their squigonometry just can't handle such curves, and they can't control themself!

Is there a Bresenham-style algorithm similar to the midpoint algorithm for roundrects that can produce other kinds of squircles?

helle253
5d ago
why is this flagged lmao
ohadron
5d ago
But why
rpgbr
5d ago
fuckexcessiveborderradius.com (I'm looking at you, macOS 26)
ID: 45913319Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 6:03:34 AM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.