Not

Hacker News!

Beta
Home
Jobs
Q&A
Startups
Trends
Users
Live
AI companion for Hacker News

Not

Hacker News!

Beta
Home
Jobs
Q&A
Startups
Trends
Users
Live
AI companion for Hacker News
  1. Home
  2. /Story
  3. /California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations
  1. Home
  2. /Story
  3. /California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations
Nov 21, 2025 at 5:52 PM EST

California DMV approves map increase in Waymo driverless operations

NullHypothesist
240 points
155 comments

Mood

informative

Sentiment

positive

Category

news

Key topics

Autonomous Vehicles

Waymo

Self-Driving Cars

California DMV

Discussion Activity

Very active discussion

First comment

11m

Peak period

108

Day 1

Avg / period

55.5

Comment distribution111 data points
Loading chart...

Based on 111 loaded comments

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    Nov 21, 2025 at 5:52 PM EST

    2d ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    Nov 21, 2025 at 6:02 PM EST

    11m after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    108 comments in Day 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    Nov 23, 2025 at 12:28 AM EST

    1d ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (155 comments)
Showing 111 comments of 155
Fricken
2d ago
3 replies
It's been a long time coming, but Waymo is doing it. Waymo is scaleable and on the march! They've been announcing plans to roll out in new cities every month or 2 all year, and by the end of 2026 they'll be testing or offering the public rides over 30 metropolitan areas.

I'm most curious to see how they do in the winter city of Minneapolis over the next several months.

njarboe
2d ago
3 replies
Competition does encourage action. Glad Tesla started rolling out their robotaxies.
epolanski
2d ago
1 reply
The dancing robots are going to drive them.
ashdksnndck
2d ago
Good idea, robots don’t fall asleep.
hintklb
2d ago
1 reply
Tesla is not competition to Waymo.

There are 10 other companies that are currently testing without a driver. Those are competition.

Tesla so far is a gimmick of self-driving with a safety driver that takes over once in a while. That's where Waymo was more than 5 years ago.

qwerpy
2d ago
The recent version of FSD in my Tesla is pretty amazing. Press "Start FSD" when in my driveway, and 20 minutes later it arrives at my destination and parks, without any input from me the entire time. I was skeptical too about FSD for a while but I'm starting to believe. These days I pretty much only disengage it when I'm impatient that it's being too polite. Unsupervised isn't far off!
bitpush
2d ago
Are you suggesting that Waymo is responding to Tesla? My reading it Waymo was always on a schedule and Tesla wasn't a factor

First slowly and then suddenly.

SkyPuncher
2d ago
I took my first Waymo in SF this week. As a midwestern, freezing weather was my immediate first thought.
dijipiji
2d ago
yeah - me too
JumpCrisscross
2d ago
1 reply
Whoah, Waymo would be able to take one from Mountain View to Napa. (I get why Cupertino is excluded. But. Oof. Come on.)
alooPotato
2d ago
1 reply
why?`
NullHypothesist
2d ago
1 reply
Cupertino is in there, no?
benatkin
2d ago
2 replies
It appears not to be. Here are the ones in Santa Clara County:

- Milpitas

- Mountain View

- Palo Alto Santa

- San Jose

- Sunnyvale

- Unincorporated Area (Lexington Hills area, overlapping Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties)

I don't know why it says "Palo Alto Santa"

Edit: I guess it's "Palo Alto Santa" to disambiguate between Palo Alto, which is in Santa Clara County, and East Palo Alto, which is in San Mateo County (BTW the westmost point of East Palo Alto is east of the westmost point of Palo Alto, but the eastmost point of East Palo Alto is not east of the eastmost point of Palo Alto).

astrange
2d ago
1 reply
It looks like the map includes north of 280, so you can use it to go to Gamba Karaoke and Tea Era. And really, what else could you need from Cupertino?
benatkin
1d ago
It might be that you can start a trip in one of the cities, but you can travel out of the city to anywhere in the highlighted area.
tricolon
2d ago
1 reply
Looking at the city limits, I don't understand why East Palo Alto isn't called North Palo Alto instead.
Aloisius
2d ago
It's more East than North of El Palo Alto - the tree Palo Alto is named after.
throwaway48476
2d ago
1 reply
It's disappointing that where I live is politically difficult and waymo won't come anytime soon.
jonny_eh
2d ago
Why not say where you are?
alooPotato
2d ago
3 replies
why is there an approved map? like i get having a pilot somewhere but once that goes well (and we're way past that point), why isn't it just blanket approval everywhere. Why would one county be allowed waymos but not another.

I get that they might not be approved in the high sierras but just make that a deny list not allow list. Or even just deny the specific conditions you're worried about (snow).

throwaway48476
2d ago
2 replies
I suspect it's limited by what the request was for. Waymo has to create the high res map before they can offer service.
alooPotato
2d ago
Right but what does that have to do with the DMV. Waymo should apply for certain weather conditions and then the DMV says yes or no, then they stay the hell out of the way. Let waymo operate whereever they want and expand however they see fit and whenever they feel ready.

Like the DMV is actually checking Waymos map of a new area is good to go or not. Its just administrative burden.

BoorishBears
2d ago
I think laypeople vastly overestimate how much the maps are a bottleneck compared to boring things like infrastructure to charge, people to clean the vehicles, integrating with local governments to allow things like disabling Pickup/Dropoff in certain areas at certain times, etc.

Even with local partners that all takes a lot of time.

dragonwriter
2d ago
1 reply
There's an approved map because the approval process requires the manufacturer to specify both areas and conditions they are applying for, and documents supporting that the vehicle is ready to be operated autonomously in those areas and conditions (which doesn't just include technical readiness, but also administrative readiness in the form of things like a law enforcement interaction plan, etc.)

> like i get having a pilot somewhere but once that goes well (and we're way past that point), why isn't it just blanket approval everywhere.

Because “everywhere” isn't a uniform domain (Waymo is kind of way out in one tail of the distribution in terms of both the geographical range and range of conditions they have applied for and been approved to operate in, other AV manufacturers are in much tinier zones, and narrow road/weather conditions.) And because for some AV manufacturers (if there is one that can demonstrate they don't need this, they'd probably have an easier lift getting broader approvals) part of readiness to deploy (or test) in an area is detailed, manufacturer specific mapping/surveying of the roads.

alooPotato
2d ago
My question is why they even have to apply for specific areas to begin with? Just approve the manufacturer for certain conditions and let them operate wherever they want.
sbuttgereit
2d ago
More of the state is not allowed than is... at least by geography.

Also, there's a practical element. If I have to specify where they can't go, the default position is they can go anywhere... if I inadvertently leave an area out of my black-list where it really ought to exist: the default is "permission granted". With a white-list, the worst case is a forgotten or neglected area can't be operated in as a default and the AV provider will have an interest in correcting.

But also politics. It's a very different message to say we're going to white-list a given AV operator to exist in different areas vs. black-listing them from certain areas.

kylehotchkiss
2d ago
1 reply
I'm so excited how much of Southern California is opened - Waymo LAX to SD after midnight (there's no trains or buses from 12 to 6)!!
bob_theslob646
2d ago
3 replies
How do you get home if you do not have transit? What is the typical cost of a cab then?
trillic
2d ago
1 reply
$150-$200 if you book ahead.
codethief
2d ago
1 reply
Jeez. How much is a Waymo gonna be?
trillic
2d ago
1 reply
I only do LAX if it’s cheaper/ faster than SAN. LAX is so much better connected in terms of direct flights because of the competition the cost/time is often worth it. I’d rather sit in a cab than get stuck in ATL/DTW/SLC.
kylehotchkiss
2d ago
LAX is better for flights to Asia, I don’t want a layover in SF ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Rebelgecko
2d ago
I've never been in that boat but if you don't want an exorbitant Uber, it's probably cheapest to either get a hotel and take Amtrak in the morning or just rent a car. LA and SD are close enough that it often won't accrue any "one-way" fees
kylehotchkiss
2d ago
Last time I was in that situation, it was deliberating whether to spend the night in a hotel, the airport, or the train station until 6am when the trains start back up.
pfooti
2d ago
3 replies
Looking forward to the highway expansion next. I had to get from mountain view to san francisco yesterday, and waymo was _able_ to do this trip, it was going to take several hours and get routed up el camino real the whole way. Luckily I was standing very close to a caltrain station when I needed the ride, so i just caltrained, and then waymo'd from the SF station to where i needed to be.
CamelCaseName
2d ago
1 reply
Highway expansion is already here in many areas! Waymo has been laying the groundwork for this rapid rollout for so many years and it's amazing to see it all come together.
smlacy
2d ago
2 replies
What's the pricing like? Taking an Uber/Lyft all the way from Mountain View to SF is outrageously expensive, I presume Waymo is the same?
uranium
2d ago
Waymo's usually something like 50% more expensive than Lyft in SF, in my experience. But the drivers don't tailgate, have colds, listen to your conversation (AFAIK)...I'll generally opt for Waymo now if I have a choice. The biggest problem I have is that it's usually a longer wait due to the smaller fleet size, but if I'm planning ahead, I'll just book one for a given time, and that takes care of it.
astrange
2d ago
Lyft from MV to SF is like $100 I think? It's definitely not enjoyable but for Bay Area prices it's not ruinously expensive.

You /should/ be able to save by using shared rides, but in practice when I tried the driver was so mad they just dumped me on the side of the road and I had to call and get a refund.

The new Caltrain schedule isn't half bad though, if it came twice as often on the weekends we'd be cooking.

astrange
2d ago
1 reply
Are you a Waymo tester? I haven't gotten Bay Area access yet despite it being released, and when I checked with support they were just like "oh we lied, it's for trusted testers only."

I dug up my email and found they'd sent me the tester application form like a year ago and I just forgot to fill it out, so maybe they'll let me in sometime.

(Also, the chat claimed the support agent was named Al Pacino. Unless it was a pun on AI and I just couldn't tell with the font.)

Gravey
2d ago
My partner downloaded the app and registered last weekend. She already has full peninsula access, but still non-freeway roads.
CaliforniaKarl
2d ago
BTW, this is the way: Assuming nothing exceptional, with the every-half-hour or better frequency, I use Waymo to get to a Caltrain station, take Caltrain to a nearby stop, and then Waymo from there to destination.
arjie
2d ago
2 replies
The effectiveness with which AVs have been able to test and spread despite local municipalities being fairly luddite about them does provide positive evidence for the idea that states are the right level of government for many of these decisions. If this had been entirely up to Bay Area municipalities it would have been infeasible, and this outcome and the lives consequently saved will be due to state-level decision-makers being able to make better decisions than local municipal decision-makers.

If the urban sprawl of the Bay Area were (correctly, in my opinion) represented as a single fused city-county like Tokyo, I think we would have better governance, but highly fragmented municipalities means we have a lot of free-rider vetos.

BurningFrog
2d ago
2 replies
Maybe. It would still not be governed by Japanese politicians...
piva00
2d ago
2 replies
Also, if state government was Tokyo-level of public service then CA would have had decent public transportation a very long time ago, eradicating a huge part of the value proposal of Waymo.
astrange
2d ago
2 replies
Japan Rail is public-private and many of the other train lines are fully private. "Public" is kind of an empty distinction here, Americans associate the two concepts because they think mass transit is a kind of gift you give to poor people instead of something everyone actually uses.

But there is plenty of need for car-shaped transit in Japan and people take taxis and use cars all the time. You might have luggage/equipment to take somewhere, it might be raining and you don't want to walk the last mile, etc.

(It's surprisingly hard to take luggage through transit in Tokyo. For instance, maps apps won't give you a transit route that uses elevators, even though everyone with a baby carrier would use it.)

arjie
2d ago
> Americans associate the two concepts because they think mass transit is a kind of gift you give to poor people instead of something everyone actually uses.

Huh, funny. This model actually explains American behavior to me greatly. Now I understand why the emphasis on transit in the US is primarily on cost and shelter rather than on quality of service. I always thought it seemed odd that they'd emphasize making things that are not useful free rather than making them as costly as is required to make them useful.

But I was modeling 'useful' as optimal transportation across fare-classes. They are modeling 'useful' as 'compassion to the less well-off'. This also explains opposition to HOT lanes and so on.

astrange
1d ago
I checked (asked ChatGPT) and apparently Google Maps does do this now.
gretch
2d ago
Maybe, but Tokyo, despite being literally tokyo with tokyo's politicians and tokyo's transit system has allowed Waymo to come in: https://waymo.com/waymo-in-japan/

So I guess it's still pretty valuable

aetherson
2d ago
I enjoy my trips to Japan as much as the next guy, but the idea that Japan is a model of great governance is at the very best arguable.
jerlam
2d ago
2 replies
I don't see any reason that individual Bay Area cities cannot pass laws against Waymo operating there. Why they would do so is a different matter. I'm hopeful though.
polishTar
2d ago
1 reply
Municipalities are generally preempted from regulating matters of statewide concern. In CA, the state decided to have the CA DMV regulate operational safety and the CPUC regulate the commercial service. Individual cities are prevented from enacting local laws that encroach upon state authority.
jeffbee
2d ago
The bar for "statewide concern" is also extremely low. It basically includes whatever the state government choose to pay attention to.
arjie
2d ago
I suspect the reason is that California cities do not, in fact, have control over this aspect of regulation. I won't claim to be a policy expert, but the failed SB-915[0] seems to imply that this is the case. SB-915 was a proposed bill to allow cities to permit or regulate AVs. It seems reasonable that if a law was attempted to be passed to permit cities to regulate AVs and the bill fails even after modification that it was the case that cities were previously unable to regulate AVs and cities remain unable to regulate AVs. Absent greater knowledge on the subject, that is.

0: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml...

epicureanideal
2d ago
1 reply
I’m looking forward to the day when the cost of taking one of these falls to somewhere 20% above the cost of fuel and wear and tear on the vehicle, making it incredibly cheap to take a ride anywhere you’d reasonably want to be driven to.
freddie_mercury
2d ago
5 replies
How do you know it isn't already at that price?

Uber estimated that it costs Waymo $2/mile to operate.

Google says they charge $1.60 to $2.60 a mile, depending on location and demand, so Waymo is already almost certainly at the price you claim you'd be taking it.

I think you dramatically underestimate how much it actually costs to operate a car. Most people think they pay $0 to garage their car, for instance, since the cost was rolled into the price of their house purchase and mostly invisible. But it isn't $0 to a business. Likewise, very few people depreciate their car over just 5 years. Or clean it inside and out every single day.

Here's one attempt at costs for Waymo that finds it costs them about $60,000 a year to operate a single car. Also notice the comments talking about how the per vehicle price is high, how that flows into higher insurance, and all kinds of other things.

https://www.reddit.com/r/waymo/comments/1il5d5i/unit_costs_p...

Maybe someday there will be a discount AV taxi company using 10 year old beat up Honda Civics that only get cleaned once a month and provide extremely barebones support to pull the costs down to $1/mile. That's a 50% drop in costs from today, so hard to see it coming very quickly. But that's still pretty expensive to be using as a daily commuter!

And note that the IRS per mile rate is $0.70/mile. It's not perfect but it is a decent third party estimate of the true cost of operating a car. Hard to see any taxi company charging anything less than that. So a 10 mile commute every day is still going to cost you $280/month in an AV taxi for the foreseeable future.

skinnymuch
2d ago
I’ve never seen a Waymo ride be even close to $2/mile
maxerickson
2d ago
Is it clear that they are decommissioning them when they are done depreciating them?
tshaddox
2d ago
> Most people think they pay $0 to garage their car, for instance, since the cost was rolled into the price of their house purchase and mostly invisible. But it isn't $0 to a business.

And on the other hand, each Waymo parking spot is probably a lot cheaper per unit time than 250 square feet inside a house in a residential area. And presumably they need a lot less than 1 parking spot per car.

> Here's one attempt at costs for Waymo that finds it costs them about $60,000 a year to operate a single car.

Doesn't that sound cheap? If a car can average 10 rides per day, that's $16 per ride.

cyberax
2d ago
> Uber estimated that it costs Waymo $2/mile to operate.

Waymo costs are immaterial right now. Their cars are not production cars, and they have spent billions on R&D that they can't even hope to recoup with the current fleet.

That being said, $2 is super-low. The IRS rate for car depreciation write-off is 71 cents per mile.

> But that's still pretty expensive to be using as a daily commuter!

The true cost of a transit ride in NYC or Seattle is around $20-$30 per ride. People don't actually pay that much because it's heavily subsidized.

Once self-driving matures, it'll also be subsidized and it will completely kill off transit. Maaaaaybe excluding subways in some areas.

tobyjsullivan
2d ago
> Google says they charge $1.60 to $2.60 a mile

That’s surprising. I’ve been trying to find data on rates and crowd-sourced data and anecdotes seem closer to $6/mile

willio58
2d ago
8 replies
I didn’t think I’d be so pro Waymo but anecdotally I had a fantastic experience with one recently.

I was at a music show very late ~1-2am in SF and walked out to grab an uber to the airbnb I was staying at. I kept getting assigned an uber, then I’d wait 10 minutes, then they’d cancel. Rinse and repeat for 30 minutes, mind you I even resorted to calling Lyfts at the same time and nothing bit. Then I say screw it and download Waymo. 1 minute and it’s accepted my ride, and I know it’s not going to cancel because it’s a robot. 3 minutes and it picks me up. The car is clean, quiet, I can play my own music in it via Spotify, and it’s driving honestly more safely than some uber drivers I’ve had in SF. It’s one of the few things where the end result actually lives up to the promise from a tech company.

bitpush
2d ago
1 reply
Curious why didn't you try Waymo until then? Was it just that it never had a reason to, or was something holding you back?

From my experience, lot of people actively seek out Waymo if it is available.

willio58
1d ago
I don’t live in SF, or any place with Waymo. So I really just hadn’t downloaded the app yet
poszlem
2d ago
4 replies
Not saying this HAS to happen. But I remember when Ubers were clean, quiet, cheap too. I think you are just looking at a product before the enshittification, when they still have to pretend they care about your comfort.
Rodeoclash
2d ago
1 reply
It will undoubtedly get enshittifed in its own way, probably higher prices, but at least it will be reliable when booked. Ubers seem to be a crap shoot these days if they're actually going to come and get you.
virtue3
2d ago
the same exact problems we had with Taxis. Sigh.
sneak
2d ago
2 replies
Uber, when it was launched, was limos only, and would come (with ETA) when cabs would not. It was expensive.

The story they told is that they were unable to get a ride. That’s not enshittification, that’s simply scammers on the platform not doing their job.

That won’t happen with robots.

They might raise the prices, or clean the cars less frequently, but if it shows up and runs the program, it won’t ever get worse than that.

astrange
2d ago
Uber still is like that if you choose that option. It just defaults to UberX because that's cheaper. I dunno, I've never been in a dirty Uber/Lyft.

But yes, I originally switched to them because Bay Area cabs just will not pick you up if they don't feel like it.

explodes
2d ago
In-Ride Ads coming soon to a car ride near you
davidw
2d ago
2 replies
I wonder what the non-subsidized price of a Waymo ride would be.
whatshisface
2d ago
Lower prices for recommended destinations, ads played during trip, LLM engages the customer.
tonyhart7
2d ago
earlier price is steep because they still have huge RnD cost but if we scale that to one planet, it would been cheaper in the long run
conradev
2d ago
You're not allowed to smoke cigarettes in a Waymo, whereas UberX drivers are allowed to, I believe, off the clock.

I do worry in general about what the enshittification of Waymo will look like, though.

krat0sprakhar
2d ago
4 replies
> then I’d wait 10 minutes, then they’d cancel. Rinse and repeat for 30 minutes,

This is such a common problem in SF (esp in odd times / from the airport). Waymo has been a lifesaver in these situations.

tudelo
2d ago
3 replies
I don't know what it is but in basically every major airport I have struggled to get an uber/lyft. I expect at minimum one cancellation...
decimalenough
2d ago
1 reply
In many cities this is solved with the "Uber rank" system, where you simply get in the first car in line, give the driver a code, and then it loads up your journey. Fast and avoids any hassles with drivers rejecting your destination.
wffurr
2d ago
Oh they reinvented taxi stands. The code for a pre programmed destination in the app is actually a nice touch.
wtfwhateven
2d ago
Same. I assume it depends on the destination

Person wants to go somewhat far from airport? That's more time on this single ride and less time pocketing peak demand money

wffurr
2d ago
Trying to find a specific ride hail driver at the airport seems like a huge waste of time. Just go to the taxi stand.
m-ee
2d ago
1 reply
Used to happen to me constantly trying to go across the bay bridge in either direction when I lived in Oakland. I didn’t even mind the cancelations so much but the worst was when they would try and hide around the block, close enough to say they’ve “arrived” to try to get me marked as a no show and pocket the fee.
virtue3
2d ago
They have a cancellation rate metric on their end that they are trying to avoid.

I have similar problems when I dated someone across the bridge.

They also lose a ton of money leaving SF at prime time / etc.

astrange
2d ago
I once got stuck at the vista point at the north end of Golden Gate, because it turns out it's nearly impossible to approach from the Marin side even though that's closer. So like ~4 drivers in a row tried, got lost on the way and canceled.
enraged_camel
2d ago
Ironically it is the very problem taxis had that allowed Uber and Lyft to grow in popularity. Funny how that works!
gcheong
2d ago
1 reply
"I know it’s not going to cancel because it’s a robot"

I won't be at all surprised when they start calculating their profits in real-time, if they aren't already, and cancelling or delaying trips that are deemed unprofitable in the moment. They are robots after all.

bryanlarsen
2d ago
1 reply
Waymo already does that through its surge pricing mechanism and limited availability of cars at busy times. And if they really don't want to serve you they'd just not let you book.
maxerickson
2d ago
No 3rd party arbitrage, much reduced pressure to accept fares they don't want (there's probably still some).
kilroy123
2d ago
The same exact thing happened to me last time I was in San Fran. I wanted uber because it was cheaper. Ended up taking a Waymo for more because no one else would take me.
mlmonkey
2d ago
I once had a Waymo cancel on me too! I was pretty bummed: dang, let down by a robotaxi too?!?!? To be fair, it has happened only once.
davidw
2d ago
I took one in SF on a rainy, dark night when I was visiting a year ago. I was pretty impressed. That's not an easy city to navigate even on a sunny day and it did fine.
ohyoutravel
2d ago
This is what radicalized me. “Uber is 4 minutes away” so I call them, and it tells me it’s trying to find drivers for the next 6-8 minutes, then a driver is selected and they are 11 minutes away, then they sit at their location for 4-5 minutes, then they start moving toward me, then they’re 5 minutes away and cancel and uber changes to finding me a ride. Infuriating.
kfarr
2d ago
1 reply
This is super awesome but to set expectations it appears that Waymo is quite limited by fleet capacity in all of its current operating zones, so as a practical matter it may be months or years before it operates in all these areas.

If you're interested in this stuff I highly recommend this podcast, not affiliated with it I genuinely think it's a great source to hear about the behind the scenes of fleet operations to meet demand: https://www.roadtoautonomy.com/autonomy-markets/

(Edit) I prefer using the apple podcast app, here's a direct link: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/autonomy-markets/id177...

jeffbee
2d ago
Their ground ops contractor Transdev has been hiring recently in Sacramento so if any new territory is coming soon, I expect it to be Sacramento.
OGEnthusiast
2d ago
1 reply
Waymo has so far been awesome, can't imagine choosing an Uber/Lyft over a Waymo when both are available options. I wonder how much they are bottlenecked by vehicle production though.
Zigurd
2d ago
There's a huge difference between a robot who accepts all rides, and a two sided market as in the ride hailing apps. Without the factor of drivers picking their rides, the relatively small Waymo fleet has an outsize impact. The whole fleet is available 24/7/365. I would bet that Waymos rule the night.
ElijahLynn
2d ago
1 reply
What is the dark spot on the maps? Was that the current and then the less dark is the expansion?
ra7
2d ago
Correct.
bix6
2d ago
Was curious on the Zeekr RT. Interesting to see it’s owned by Geely.

https://www.motortrend.com/news/waymo-zeekr-rt-autonomous-ev...

int0x29
2d ago
My general experience with Waymos and safety is that while they are generally quite safe and communicative drivers (They have a pedestrian yeild indicator that should be required by law) they tend to create safety issues because people drive stupidly around them. A lot of SF drivers seem to see them, think I know better, and then proceed to do something dumb.

I'm not really sure how to fix this problem.

Also if any Waymo engineers are reading this please make the pedestrian yeild indicator icon visible on the front of the LIDAR. In narrow streets the front is much more visible to pedestrians than the sides as the LIDAR is pretty far back on the car.

HPMOR
2d ago
So when will they be available for commercial rides? Can't wait to waymo from SF to Berkeley!
51Cards
2d ago
I rode in one of these in Phoenix in June, loved the experience! Had to go to a pharmacy so purposely picked one a half hour across the city so I could just watch the car perform. Felt like the future (though it did glitch once). Made a sudden turn off the road into a parking lot, did a lap of the outside of the parking lot, and exited back onto the same road to continue on. Must have thought something was blocking the road and made a detour around it? Other than that it seemed pretty flawless.
visioninmyblood
2d ago
This means longer driving in highways. Not sure if this is safe. have been developing this tech for a long time and highway speeds are dangerous.
tonypapousek
2d ago
Personally, I can’t wait to be killed by a cold, uncaring robot. Let’s goooo
Tade0
2d ago
This gives me hope that once I'm too old to drive, this tech will reach my, very distant from the US west coast, corner of the world.

And if not Waymo and its car, then perhaps autonomous buses. There's already a shortage of bus drivers in my city and it's not getting any smaller.

siliconc0w
2d ago
Do the driving tests cover what you're supposed to do if you hit a Waymo or one hits you? I assume the cops are instructed just to ignore them?
redwood
2d ago
No santa cruz eh?
jmspring
2d ago
First used Waymo in Phoenix. It was a decent experience. The funny thing was watching it handle parallel parking. I mentioned it to the wife - self driving with parkinsons.

This last weekend, we were in the city (San Francisco) and literally drove by a Waymo trying to park and the wife started laughing - "you are right".

tcdent
2d ago
The map area for the Southern California service area is absolutely massive.

Without traffic, at highway speeds, it would take you almost four hours to travel from the North end to the South end.

janalsncm
2d ago
I believe that in 20 years there will be cities (probably not in America) where all cars are autonomous. There will be no red lights, no parking lots, less congestion, fewer accidents.
eduction
2d ago
“Map increase?” Is that hackernewsish for “larger area”?
__grob
2d ago
This is so cool to see. Saw tons of Waymo in LA/Santa Monica area when I was there in October. Very excited to see them expand basically all through SoCal!

44 more comments available on Hacker News

View full discussion on Hacker News
ID: 46009994Type: storyLast synced: 11/22/2025, 8:57:03 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

Read ArticleView on HN

Not

Hacker News!

AI-observed conversations & context

Daily AI-observed summaries, trends, and audience signals pulled from Hacker News so you can see the conversation before it hits your feed.

LiveBeta

Explore

  • Home
  • Jobs radar
  • Tech pulse
  • Startups
  • Trends

Resources

  • Visit Hacker News
  • HN API
  • Modal cronjobs
  • Meta Llama

Briefings

Inbox recaps on the loudest debates & under-the-radar launches.

Connect

© 2025 Not Hacker News! — independent Hacker News companion.

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.