Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

Home
Hiring
Products
Companies
Discussion
Q&A
Users
Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

AI-observed conversations & context

Daily AI-observed summaries, trends, and audience signals pulled from Hacker News so you can see the conversation before it hits your feed.

LiveBeta

Explore

  • Home
  • Hiring
  • Products
  • Companies
  • Discussion
  • Q&A

Resources

  • Visit Hacker News
  • HN API
  • Modal cronjobs
  • Meta Llama

Briefings

Inbox recaps on the loudest debates & under-the-radar launches.

Connect

© 2025 Not Hacker News! — independent Hacker News companion.

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.

Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

Home
Hiring
Products
Companies
Discussion
Q&A
Users
  1. Home
  2. /Discussion
  3. /AutoITE – An Algorithm for Estimating ITE
  1. Home
  2. /Discussion
  3. /AutoITE – An Algorithm for Estimating ITE
Last activity 18h agoPosted Nov 26, 2025 at 2:40 AM EST

Autoite – an Algorithm for Estimating Ite

HotProtato
1 points
1 comments

Mood

informative

Sentiment

neutral

Category

startup_launch

Key topics

Causal Inference
Statistics
Machine Learning

AutoITE: An Algorithm for Estimating ITE

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Light discussion

First comment

N/A

Peak period

1

Hour 1

Avg / period

1

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    Nov 26, 2025 at 2:40 AM EST

    18h ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    Nov 26, 2025 at 2:40 AM EST

    0s after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    1 comments in Hour 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    Nov 26, 2025 at 2:40 AM EST

    18h ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (1 comments)
Showing 1 comments
HotProtatoAuthor
18h ago
Refer to the "paper" folder for rigorous documentation on my insights and why the repository works.

The general philosophy is, the effect of treatment T on outcome Y given group G of controls X is defined by latent environment U, where a latent environment is based on intrinsic similarity in how samples behave, not physical labels such as "hospital A".

As ridge is the first component in the pipeline, it has proven to be extremely rigorous against noise and increase features, and given proxies are required, a "better to be safe than sorry" approach is preferred, meaning more features which is in contrast to typical causal inference.

You fit a dataset, then get ITE predictions for each sample. A thresholding approach also exists, I advise reviewing my paper for its mechanism and utility.

Real world data is difficult to procure for testing counterfactuals, so only one dataset of real world data is used, in which we don't know the true ground truth.

Feedback is most appreciated.

View full discussion on Hacker News
ID: 46055086Type: storyLast synced: 11/26/2025, 7:42:26 AM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

Read ArticleView on HN
Not Hacker News Logo

Not

Hacker

News!

AI-observed conversations & context

Daily AI-observed summaries, trends, and audience signals pulled from Hacker News so you can see the conversation before it hits your feed.

LiveBeta

Explore

  • Home
  • Hiring
  • Products
  • Companies
  • Discussion
  • Q&A

Resources

  • Visit Hacker News
  • HN API
  • Modal cronjobs
  • Meta Llama

Briefings

Inbox recaps on the loudest debates & under-the-radar launches.

Connect

© 2025 Not Hacker News! — independent Hacker News companion.

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.