Hard and Deep Tech – Why Are Jira and Confluence the Go-to Pm Tools?
Mood
informative
Sentiment
neutral
Category
ask_hn
Key topics
Atlassian was built for software workflows, so I get why software teams rely on it. But for hardware/ops-heavy teams, it always felt like an odd fit to me.
My take for why hardware/ops teams still use it are below but I'm curious to hear other people's opinions.
-Regulatory + data security requirements (ITAR, export control, validated systems, etc.) box teams into whatever their org already approved years ago. -Heritage + inertia. Jira/Confluence have been around forever, most companies already use them, and no one wants to be the person who tries to introduce something new. -“At least everyone knows how to use it.” In mixed orgs (prime <> supplier <> test house <> customer), Jira/Confluence are the lowest common denominator tools people can agree on, even if they're a bad fit. -No one wants to adopt or pay for another system. Hardware teams already juggle spreadsheets, slides, GSE databases, readiness trackers, etc. Jira and Confluence are “good enough,” so they stick.
If Jira and Confluence aren't a great fit for hardware/ops work, what would a better tool actually need to do? And what would make adoption difficult?
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
5m
Peak period
2
Hour 1
Avg / period
1.3
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 25, 2025 at 8:54 PM EST
1d ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 25, 2025 at 8:59 PM EST
5m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
2 comments in Hour 1
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 26, 2025 at 10:59 AM EST
10h ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Discussion hasn't started yet.
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.