Not

Hacker News!

Beta
Home
Jobs
Q&A
Startups
Trends
Users
Live
AI companion for Hacker News

Not

Hacker News!

Beta
Home
Jobs
Q&A
Startups
Trends
Users
Live
AI companion for Hacker News
  1. Home
  2. /Story
  3. /A logging loop in GKE cost me $1,300 in 3 days – 9.2x my actual infrastructure
  1. Home
  2. /Story
  3. /A logging loop in GKE cost me $1,300 in 3 days – 9.2x my actual infrastructure
Nov 24, 2025 at 10:23 AM EST

A logging loop in GKE cost me $1,300 in 3 days – 9.2x my actual infrastructure

nthypes
1 points
0 comments

Mood

heated

Sentiment

negative

Category

tech_discussion

Key topics

GKE

Cloud Logging

Billing

Kubernetes

Logging Costs

Last month, a single container in my GKE cluster (Sao Paulo region) entered an error loop, outputting to stdout at ~2k logs/second. I discovered the hard way that GKE's default behavior is to ingest 100% of this into Cloud Logging with no rate limiting. My bill jumped nearly 1000% before alerts caught it.

Infrastructure (Compute): ~$140 (R$821 BRL) Cloud Logging: ~$1,300 (R$7,554 BRL)

Ratio: Logging cost 9.2x the actual servers.

https://imgur.com/jGrxnkh

I fixed the loop and paused the `_Default` sink immediately.

I opened a billing ticket requesting a "one-time courtesy adjustment" for a runaway resource—standard practice for first-time anomalies on AWS/Azure.

I have been rejected twice.

The latest response: "The team has declined the adjustment request due to our internal policies."

If you run GKE, the `_Default` sink in Log Router captures all container stdout/stderr.

There is NO DEFAULT CAP on ingestion volume which is an absurd!

A simple while(true); do echo "error"; done can bankrupt a small project.

Go to Logging -> Log Router. Edit _Default sink.

Add an exclusion filter: resource.type="k8s_container" severity=INFO (or exclude specific namespaces).

Has anyone successfully escalated a billing dispute past Tier 1 support recently?

It seems their policy is now to enforce full payment even on obvious runaway/accidental usage which is absurd since its LOGS! TEXT!

Discussion Activity

Light discussion

First comment

1h

Peak period

1

Hour 2

Avg / period

1

Comment distribution3 data points
Loading chart...

Based on 3 loaded comments

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    Nov 24, 2025 at 10:23 AM EST

    10h ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    Nov 24, 2025 at 11:37 AM EST

    1h after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    1 comments in Hour 2

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    Nov 24, 2025 at 3:40 PM EST

    5h ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (0 comments)

Discussion hasn't started yet.

ID: 46035065Type: storyLast synced: 11/24/2025, 3:24:08 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

View on HN

Not

Hacker News!

AI-observed conversations & context

Daily AI-observed summaries, trends, and audience signals pulled from Hacker News so you can see the conversation before it hits your feed.

LiveBeta

Explore

  • Home
  • Jobs radar
  • Tech pulse
  • Startups
  • Trends

Resources

  • Visit Hacker News
  • HN API
  • Modal cronjobs
  • Meta Llama

Briefings

Inbox recaps on the loudest debates & under-the-radar launches.

Connect

© 2025 Not Hacker News! — independent Hacker News companion.

Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.