Back to Home11/17/2025, 6:26:54 PM

Untitled

parpfish
0 points
0 comments
that example of the radiologist review cases touches on one worry i have about automation with human-in-the-loop for safety. specifically that a human in the loop wont work as a safeguard unless they are meaningfully engaged beyond being a simple reviewer.

how do you sustain attention and thoughtfully review radiological scans when 99% of the time you agree with the automated assessment? i'm pretty sure that no matter how well trained the doctor is they will end up just spamming "LGTM" after a while.

Discussion Activity

Light discussion

First comment

5m

Peak period

2

Hour 1

Avg / period

1.5

Comment distribution3 data points

Based on 3 loaded comments

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    11/17/2025, 6:26:54 PM

    1d ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    11/17/2025, 6:31:39 PM

    5m after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    2 comments in Hour 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    11/17/2025, 9:54:53 PM

    1d ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (0 comments)

Discussion hasn't started yet.

ID: 45956379Type: commentLast synced: 11/17/2025, 6:30:05 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

View on HN