Back to Home11/17/2025, 10:42:54 AM

Untitled

0 points
0 comments
I submitted this and unfortunately it is likely AI generated. The authors github history suggests it at the very least, along with seemingly misunderstanding a reference to a Zig language feature (labeled blocks - https://zig.guide/language-basics/labelled-blocks/) in the project issues (https://github.com/zigbook/zigbook/issues/4).

I’m not sure how much value is to be had here, and it’s unfortunate the author wasn’t honest about how it was created.

I wish I wouldn’t have submitted this so quickly but I was excited about the new resource and the chapters I dug into looked good and accurate. I worry about whether this will be maintained, and if it’s worth investing time into.

Discussion Activity

Very active discussion

First comment

28m

Peak period

36

Day 1

Avg / period

19.5

Comment distribution39 data points

Based on 39 loaded comments

Key moments

  1. 01Story posted

    11/17/2025, 10:42:54 AM

    2d ago

    Step 01
  2. 02First comment

    11/17/2025, 11:10:33 AM

    28m after posting

    Step 02
  3. 03Peak activity

    36 comments in Day 1

    Hottest window of the conversation

    Step 03
  4. 04Latest activity

    11/18/2025, 5:26:31 PM

    22h ago

    Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (0 comments)

Discussion hasn't started yet.

ID: 45952436Type: commentLast synced: 11/17/2025, 10:44:03 AM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.