Back to Home11/17/2025, 2:27:11 AM

Untitled

0 points
0 comments
> A bug in Rust component that could have led to Windows kernel compromise

I don't think this bug could have led to a kernel compromise unless you count a DoS as a kernel compromise, which I'm a bit skeptical of. From the article:

> Notably, the system crash was triggered by this new kernel component designed to improve security, as suggested by the name of the panic_bounds_check() function referenced in the stack trace shown in Figure 2.

Later:

> When the region_from_path_mut() function converts a path into a region it represents the outline as a singly linked list of edge blocks. The program detects the out-of-bounds memory access via core::panicking::panic_bounds_check() and triggers a SYSTEM_SERVICE_EXCEPTION.

And from Microsoft's assessment of the bug:

> “the Rust code correctly catches an out-of-bounds array access and triggers a panic, resulting in a Blue Screen of Death (BSOD), as expected”

Furthermore, from the implementation of core::panicking::panic_bounds_check() [0]:

    #[lang = "panic_bounds_check"] // needed by codegen for panic on OOB array/slice access
    fn panic_bounds_check(index: usize, len: usize) -> ! { ... }
So you have an attempted OOB access, but since (safe) Rust guarantees OOB accesses will panic I don't think there's a path to escalate the DoS to a full kernel compromise short of an optimizer bug and/or the use of unsafe, for which there doesn't appear to be evidence for either.

[0]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/src/core/panicking.rs.html

Discussion Activity

No activity data yet

We're still syncing comments from Hacker News.

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (0 comments)

Discussion hasn't started yet.

ID: 45950355Type: commentLast synced: 11/17/2025, 2:58:05 AM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.