The Hunger Games Begin
Mood
heated
Sentiment
negative
Category
politics
Key topics
income inequality
economic policy
social unrest
Paul Krugman's article 'The Hunger Games Begin' discusses the growing wealth gap and economic instability in the US, sparking a heated discussion on the HN community about the implications of rising inequality and the potential for social unrest.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
1m
Peak period
22
Day 1
Avg / period
11.5
Based on 23 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
10/31/2025, 6:16:10 PM
18d ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
10/31/2025, 6:17:22 PM
1m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
22 comments in Day 1
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
11/1/2025, 11:59:14 PM
17d ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
> Why are these terrible things happening? At a basic level they’re happening because Republicans want them to happen. Drastic cuts in food stamps and health care programs were central planks in Project 2025, which is indeed the Trump administration’s policy platform, and were written into legislation in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that passed last summer.
[…]
> But there’s a further problem. Passing either a SNAP bill or a revised budget would require calling the House of Representatives back into session, which would in turn make it impossible for Mike Johnson, the speaker, to keep stalling the swearing-in of Adelita Grijalva, who won a special election more than 5 weeks ago.[1] And here’s the thing: Once sworn in, Grijalva would provide the decisive signature to trigger a vote in the House to release the Epstein files.[2]
At a basic level they're happening because 9A and 10A have been cheerfully ignored for a very long time:
https://grokipedia.com/page/United_States_Bill_of_Rights#nin...
https://grokipedia.com/page/United_States_Bill_of_Rights#ten...
The last century has been a slow tale of scope- and debt-creep.
“If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.” ― Herbert Stein, What I Think: Essays on Economics, Politics, and Life
https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/snap-helps-12-...
Neither can the Trump administration, which is why they're doing it.
It's almost like this administration is trying to provoke a reaction.
That is precisely what they are trying to do. See the Project 2025 documents. They are trying to justify invocation of the Insurrection Act.
edit: seems so:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/federa...
Of course, a handful of Democrat Senators could also vote to end the shutdown and that would fund SNAP, and everything else, too, at least for a few more weeks.
Both sides seem dug in right now. It's still not clear who I'll blink first.
Perhaps the precariat will partially awaken to the fact that the country club set on both teams doesn't give two shits about them, although parts of the limousine blue team claim to or may care slightly more but not enough to ensure universal healthcare or a decent standard of living for the 99%. Mamdani offers a glimmer of hope in a local, limited, and likely temporary manner when the 800 lbs. gorilla of corruption, brutality, and oppression continues at every level elsewhere.
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.