The Economic Impacts of AI: A Multidisciplinary, Multibook Review [pdf]
Mood
calm
Sentiment
mixed
Category
other
Key topics
AI
Economics
Future Of Work
The post shares a PDF review of multiple books on the economic impacts of AI, sparking discussion on the timeliness and relevance of the topic, as well as the potential consequences of AI on energy demand and the economy.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
3m
Peak period
21
Day 1
Avg / period
11.5
Based on 23 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 19, 2025 at 3:44 PM EDT
2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 19, 2025 at 3:47 PM EDT
3m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
21 comments in Day 1
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 21, 2025 at 9:13 AM EDT
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Zero comments there, too. Likely because direct-linking a PDF to a "book" on the multi-multi impacts of something that has barely started and we don't understand... seems less than useful.
My recap of the PDF is something like:
1. There are good books about the near-term economics as AI.
2. There aren't many good books about "what if the AI researchers are right" (e.g. rapid scientific acceleration) and the economic and political impacts of those cases.
3. The Second Machine Age: Digital progress boosts the bounty and widens the spread, more relative inequality. Wrong on speed (e.g. self driving tech vs regulatory change).
4. Prediction Machines: AI = cheaper prediction. Which raises the value of human judgement, because that's a complement.
5. Power and Prediction: Value comes when the whole system is improved not just from smaller fixes. Electrification's benefits arrived when factories reorganized, not just when they added electricity to existing layouts. Diffusion is slow because things need to be rebuilt.
6. The Data Economy: Data is a nonrivalrous asset. As models get stronger and cheaper, unique private data grows in relative value.
7. The Skill Code: Apprenticeship pathways may disappear. E.g. survival robots prevent juniors getting practice reps.
8. Co-Intelligence: Diffusion is slowed by the jagged frontier (AI is spiky). Superhuman at one thing, subhuman at another.
9. Situational Awareness: By ~2027, $1T/yr AI capex spend, big power demand, and hundreds of millions of AI researchers getting a decade of algo progress in less than a year. (Author doesn't say he agrees, but says economists should analyze what happens if it does)
10. Questions: What if the AGI-pilled AI researchers are right, what will the economic and policy implications be?
Invention vs innovation vs diffusion - this is all well-known stuff.
It's a completely different episteme than the one IABIED guys have ("If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies").
I don't think there can be any meaningful dialogue between the two camps.
1. Substack: https://www.normaltech.ai/ book: https://www.normaltech.ai/p/starting-reading-the-ai-snake-oi...
2. "Normal technology" like fire, metals, agriculture, writing, and electricity are normal technologies.
Anyway, you are shooting the messenger by downvoting me. Thanks for showing us all how intelligent you are.
But I'd be curious if you could find a quote from anyone for 1000% GDP growth per annum.
quantum? quantum AI? quantum AI on the blockchain?
Not aware of Quantum Blockchain just yet, though.
(writing this as someone who works in quantum)
Investors are incredibly overzealous to not miss out on what happened with certain stocks of the personal computing, web 2.0 and smartphone diffusion.
Doomsday timelines have lower numbers of observers. In all timelines where you are no longer an observer,i.e. all current doomsday timelines, your observation has ceased.
Going back that far may not be too helpful. Three years ago, ChatGPT wasn't out. A year ago, LLM-type AI only sort of worked. Now, it's reasonably decent in some areas. If you look at AI impacts retrospectively, you probably underestimate them.
It’s worth reading
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.