Key Takeaways
As I said, I have a thousand little questions. A thousand of them. And it's not about what is my vision in life. It's about every little question that you could think of. So what you are saying is, I assume, questions like "Is there a simulation or are we real?" or "Is time travel good".
And that's not at all what I am talking about. Those questions don't lead to useful results especially when asked by laymen who just want to be right and the other party to confirm their view.
That's also what bugs me the most, people think by setting boundaries I wanted to discuss things, or I cared about their unfounded opinions. I don't.
I want applicable knowledge and compassion from others and only that.
Reading a lot of fiction books which are considered classics, philosophy. And of course, meditation.
When I want to get informed about something controversial or very loaded in politics, I check the most extreme sources in both sides that I can possibly find, and because I know that often the 'truth' I am looking for is somewhere in the middle, I make my own conclusions. This includes newspapers, AI, Google, Reddit, X.
Test in reality. Instead of debating which advice was right, I just tried things in small experiments. Reality gave better feedback than any forum.
Write before searching. I’d first note down what I already know or would try. Then compare outside input to that. It built trust in my own reasoning.
Now I treat all advice (AI included) as raw input, not truth. My “source” is a mix of experiments + cross-checking multiple perspectives. The key shift was asking: does this expand me, or shrink me? That filter alone cut out a lot of limiting beliefs.
Everything is full of bias, propaganda, partisan activism, and outright lies. Government institutions, educational institutions, the media, Internet forums, social media, books and journal articles by the experts, and everything else. Unfortunately, AI is trained on all of this suboptimal input so it really isn’t any better.
The best thing I’ve been able to do is attempt to find a source on both sides of a topic and attempt to glean the truth that way. It’s still a flawed methodology that leaves me susceptible to biases, most dangerously of which are my own biases.
Not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator. We simply enrich the public API with analytics.