We're building a local-only security analysis tool that finds logic exploits and vulnerabilities. We're trying to figure out the standalone experience and getting split feedback between CLI with structured output and UI dashboard for visualizing attack paths.
Synthesized Answer
Based on 0 community responses
When it comes to Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) analysis tools, user preferences are divided between Command-Line Interface (CLI) and graphical User Interface (UI) dashboards. CLI is often preferred for its flexibility, automation capabilities, and structured output, which can be easily integrated into development workflows and Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. On the other hand, UI dashboards offer a more intuitive way to visualize complex data flows and attack paths, making it easier to share insights with non-technical stakeholders. The choice between CLI and UI ultimately depends on the specific use case and user role.
Key Takeaways
CLI is preferred for automation and integration into CI/CD pipelines
UI dashboards are useful for visualizing complex data and sharing insights with non-technical stakeholders
User preference depends on specific use case and role
Discussion (0 comments)
No comments available in our database yet.
Comments are synced periodically from Hacker News.