SerpApi MCP | Not Hacker News!

Discussion (6 comments)

Showing 6 comments

29 days ago

3 replies

I used Serp via API many moons ago. The most interesting part of the company imo is their legal defense of different plans:

  Production - $150
  15,000 searches / month
  U.S. Legal Shield

ie. "Our U.S. Legal Shield protects your right to crawl and parse public search engine data under the First Amendment. We assume scraping and parsing liability for customers on most recurring plans unless your usage is illegal."

I imagine at least some portion of companies use them just for this liability shield.

perks_12

29 days ago

Couldn't this be laid out as, We assume scraping and parsing liability unless it is ruled as being illegal, in which case your use would be illegal and our liability shield wouldn't help you?

scosman

29 days ago

> unless your usage is illegal

Like copyright infringement of Google's search results?

ceejayoz

29 days ago

Sounds a lot like the old guarantee paid SSL certificate providers used to offer; pretty words, but meaningless in practice. (IIRC, no one ever got a payout from any of them.)

"We assume scraping and parsing liabilities for both domestic and foreign companies unless your usage is otherwise illegal" seems like a big loophole in it.

block_dagger

29 days ago

1 reply

Embedding the API key (secret) in the URL complicates secret management. Please move that to a header and allow setting via env var.

jamescollinssp

23 days ago

Hi, thanks for the feedback. We actually already support `Bearer: Authorization <token>` auth scheme. It is accessible on https://mcp.serpapi.com/mcp path.

I would say the /apiKey/mcp integration path is more tailored for manual Claude Desktop / VS Code users where it might be easier, than trying to insert headers somehow.

Regarding the environment variables, the MCP is stateless so the secret management is handled on the client and obviously it could be set via env vars.

Resources