Product Launch

anonymous

18 points

21 comments

Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago

Show HN: Newcomer Ranking – Alternative to GitHub Trending for New Repos

git-stars.org

GitHubopen-sourcediscovery

Discussion (21 comments)

Showing 21 comments

normie3000

3 months ago

1 reply

Of the top ~20 repos I checked, they were all either AI-related or old/archived/deprecated.

zxcholmes

3 months ago

You're right, I should filter out old/archived/deprecated repositories to keep the list active.

IshKebab

3 months ago

1 reply

Yeah provide a way to filter out AI-related repos and I'm sold! I guess you could use AI to do that...

Also tone down the ads.

zxcholmes

3 months ago

Thanks for the suggestion! I'll work on adding filter options and toning down the ads.

userbinator

3 months ago

1 reply

I'll say it bluntly: Software development should not be a popularity contest.

zxcholmes

3 months ago

I think popularity to some extent represents what people are paying attention to and the technologies that are gaining traction. While it shouldn't be the only factor in evaluating software quality, it can serve as a valuable indicator of community interest and emerging trends in the tech landscape.

ramon156

3 months ago

1 reply

I kind of hate how easy it is to spot a generated frontend. All AI's use the same styling.

Numbers with gradients, big shadows, big cards that are way too big for your screen.

This by no means is a jab at the tool, I'm sure it's useful to some.

zxcholmes

3 months ago

1 reply

You're absolutely right about the AI-generated look. I'm not a UI designer, so I relied too heavily on AI for the frontend. I should probably study designs from other websites and create something more custom instead. Thanks for the feedback!

magnio

3 months ago

1 reply

> You're absolutely right

Perfect satire. Thank you.

GreenWatermelon

3 months ago

I'm beginning to doubt that it's actually satire...

nasso_dev

3 months ago

3 replies

Judging by the comments: was this project built by an LLM, posted here by an LLM, the replies to comments written by an LLM?

Is there even a human at any step or is this an agent running in the background with "go to HN front page" as its ultimate goal?

GreenWatermelon

3 months ago

And it seems there are a bunch of broken stuff that anyone with a lick of CSS skills would notice and fix right away. For example, the first 4 elements of each card (number, title, external link icon, and tag) seem like they should've been in on the same line. The pill-like "Hot" doesn't normally take a whole line by itself...

This os trivially fixed by wrapping them in a flex container. In tailwind that would take 2 seconds.

So we have:

- OP didn't even look at this project before posting it, or...

- they looked and didn't find anything wrong (no eye for quality), or....

- they looked, saw it looked off, but didn't bother to fix it, either due to lack of necessary skill to do that or maybe they didn't want to invoke the agent a second time???

I concur with your conclusion that it seems no human was involved in any step.

Also, evidently, thing doesn't even work given it shows years-old repos that didn't actually get any traction recently. It's AI slop in product form

Arch-TK

3 months ago

Even if an LLM came up with the idea for using an LLM to come up with project ideas, then implementing those project ideas, then posting those projects on HN and representing the project on HN. Someone set up the first LLM. So there's always a human...

manyaoman

3 months ago

First I thought you're surely kidding, but after looking into it I realized you could be right. RIP HN.

FredrikMeyer

3 months ago

1 reply

One of the projects listed for me was a Clojure project that hasn't been updated for 3 years.

https://github.com/stuartsierra/component

CaptainOfCoit

3 months ago

I think that's because Component is done/finished. I still use it from time to time (and have projects running in production with it right now), can't think of a single issue to fix or feature to add, at least from my perspective, it pretty much does what it should without issues.

VoidWhisperer

3 months ago

This is decidedly not a 'new' repo but shows up there anyways: https://github.com/mdn/mdn/

Also, design sidenote: the purple font that the navigation bar takes when an option is highlighted makes it next to impossible to read against the dark gray background

ChrisMarshallNY

3 months ago

Nicely done, but I’m not convinced that “number of stars” should be the only metric. It’s not a bad one, but it naturally eschews a lot of indie stuff.

This is a chronic issue with discovery queues. I like to listen to music during my morning walks, and want to have the chance to hear new, not-yet-popular songs. I may not like a lot of them, but I want the chance to decide for myself.

rkwasny

3 months ago

Where so I get an RSS feed with weekly updates?

poly2it

3 months ago

Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45541068 (8 days ago)

delusional

3 months ago

It's showing 0 for "previous stars", like it's showing data from some initial run. This is obviously broken, and not at all useful in its current state.

How is this the top post on the front page right now?

Resources