Why Your Simple Password Is a Mathematical Catastrophe
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
tawandamunongo.devTechstory
calmneutral
Debate
0/100
Password SecurityInformation TheoryCryptography
Key topics
Password Security
Information Theory
Cryptography
The article discusses how simple passwords can be a mathematical catastrophe from an information theory perspective, but the discussion on HN was limited with only one comment.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
6h
Peak period
1
6-7h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 9, 2025 at 9:07 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 9, 2025 at 3:20 PM EDT
6h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 6-7h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 9, 2025 at 3:20 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45527180Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 11:11:49 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
The great bulk of the articles and comments at HN are evidence of a distinction between talking about something and understanding it. Most of what's posted is what-aboutism; very little understanding.
This captures the nature and mood of the programmer today: able to manipulate interfaces, poor understanding of why things work.
The interwebz greatly expanded the realm of what-about while marginalizing and overwhelming understanding. This has been evident in news and scholarship for a generation.
The arrival of AIz are making it far worse for the reason that whereas, previously, the curious would seek those with understanding, today curiosity is being overrun by canned "answers" that cannot represent understanding because the oracle has none. Every response is a test of credulousness, with the gullible broken by hallucinations and the agents derailed by prompt injection.
The Turing test might be inverted to examine the edge at which humans can be deemed to think, given that we've already plumbed out that humans are very easily fooled by parroting.