Why Are Residential Property Tax Rates Regressive
Key topics
The debate around regressive residential property tax rates has sparked a lively discussion, with some commenters pointing out that expensive houses tend to be undertaxed due to inaccurate appraisals. One commenter, Findeton, stirred controversy by labeling taxes as "theft," prompting a rebuke from uberman, who argued that taxes are necessary to fund shared infrastructure and services. Meanwhile, others shared examples of more progressive tax schemes, such as Illinois' productivity index for farmland, and highlighted how wealthier homeowners can challenge their appraisals, contributing to the regressiveness of the tax system. The discussion reveals a complex interplay between tax policies, wealth inequality, and the influence of political power.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
4m
Peak period
8
0-1h
Avg / period
5
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 27, 2025 at 2:53 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 27, 2025 at 2:57 PM EDT
4m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
8 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 27, 2025 at 5:03 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Could we privatize all those things or set usage fees? Probably. Where I live many things like your well, sceptic system, garbage collection are privatized but that only works when one lives in the country. It would be impossible to privately implement most public services in urban settings. I don't think I would want to live in a city where trash collection was left up to the individual to work out how to address. Even then, you are going to end up paying for these services somehow right? In fact, I would rather my county work out a bulk trash collection contract likely at a discount and tax me for it based on the number of bedrooms I have than leave that to me to figure out with a bill I have to manage every month.
Your mileage may vary as they say but while I hate paying tax, I do enjoy the services they support and I don't see them as any kind of theft.
The money collected by the levies has always been just collateral damage.
The most productive farmland gets taxed at rates at least 4x higher than poor farmland. And really poor farmland gets taxed as if it were nearly worthless.
https://tax.illinois.gov/localgovernments/property/farmland....
Similarly, nothing about the incentives for residents (voters) in an area to use regressive property taxes as a poll tax - whether trying to prevent the less-well-to-do from living there, or to gear up gentrification for their individual benefit (higher real estate value).
Don't get me wrong, it makes me super mad that my rich neighbors want to sell their homes for 10 million bucks but are fine being appraised at a million. I'll also comp to being in the same boat, but I really wish there was a way to more accurately keep all properties properly appraised so as to keep taxes fair. Particularly when school budgets fail due to the community not paying what they owe.
There is nothing new here though. The affluent will always be able to game the system (any system) more effectively.