Who Considers Terrorism Justifiable? ML Analysis Across 65 States
Postedabout 2 months agoActiveabout 2 months ago
onlinelibrary.wiley.comResearchstory
calmneutral
Debate
20/100
TerrorismMachine LearningSocial Science
Key topics
Terrorism
Machine Learning
Social Science
A study uses machine learning to analyze attitudes towards terrorism across 65 states, sparking discussion on the nuances of justifying, predicting, and preventing terrorism.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
1h
Peak period
1
1-2h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 7, 2025 at 12:48 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 7, 2025 at 2:13 PM EST
1h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 1-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 7, 2025 at 7:20 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45848931Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 7:56:51 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Thinking it justifiable, thinking it inevitable, and thinking it effective are three completely different things.
Do not ask the questions that are easy to ask; ask the questions that are hard to ask. Then within that, do not ask the questions whose answers are hard to find; ask the questions whose answers are hard to hear.