What's Up with Peter Thiel's Obsession with the Antichrist?
Key topics
The article explores Peter Thiel's fascination with the concept of the Antichrist, sparking a discussion on the intersection of politics, religion, and ideology, with commenters offering various interpretations and critiques.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
27m
Peak period
25
0-3h
Avg / period
5.8
Based on 46 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 17, 2025 at 12:23 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 17, 2025 at 12:51 AM EDT
27m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
25 comments in 0-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 19, 2025 at 12:58 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
There are few people alive who are less fit to lecture us on matters of theology and morality than Peter Thiel.
It says directly in the article:
"...defined the practice of politics as a struggle against an existential enemy, arguing that politics is just religion in disguise." and "human societies tend to spiral toward violence in a hunt for scapegoats."
The antichrist idea is metaphor that he likes.
>He even named a suspect: Greta Thunberg.
It's insane how much hatred industrialists and boomers in general seem to focus on a kid who's fed up with their bullshit and tried to rally up other kids. I guess subconsciously they believe this mindset threatens their wealth so much that they can literally compare it to the antichrist.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rYNM4rsnNFM
transcript
https://awpc.cattcenter.iastate.edu/2019/12/03/speech-to-the...
Again speaking to the European Parliment, simlar speach around the same time.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4oyw4Wo6Kng
I think everyone knows just where she is right at this moment and how she is forceing an awareness of the conection between climate and human justice.
Content: Antichrist, prophecies, futurism; nothing that holds a truth value. Antichrist prophecies have been well established for hundreds of years as making coded gematria claims about Nero Caesar, a mother-murdering tyrannical ruler of the foreign empire that had recently destroyed the Second Temple ~79CE by the time John of Patmos was bitterly writing in ~95CE. "Nero Caesar" transliterated from Greek ('nrwn qsr') into Hebrew and added up using standard gematria gives 666. "Nero Caesar" transliterated from Latin ('nrw qsr') to Hebrew and added up gives 616, which appears in the earliest manuscripts. It's so plain and so obviously concerned with contemporary political goals of the author as to be almost boring.
Social Function: What is the social and political function achieved by Peter Thiel doing this in today's environment, styling himself as a Prophet of 'antichrist' matters?
It provides a swift pathway to an important role in unifying and binding himself to the anti-democratic theocratic Dominionists which he currently has little influence over, alongside the existing base that he already has vast influence over: the antidemocratic faction of the tech industry. By achieving a role unifying and consolidating power over the two major antidemocratic power blocs - both of which have built in tools of vast social influence (religion, social media), Peter Thiel aspires to place himself in a position of staggering influence atop a worldwide upheaval that is demolishing democratic power structures further every day.
I really think greater fluency in religion and in politics and history would help tech workers equip themselves resist be manipulated and controlled this way.
For the other bloc - the religious bloc being fished here- it has been fertile ground for grifters for decades now, so I hold very little hope that the theocrats (and in particular the New Apostolic Reformation crowd) have any hope of applying the appropriate scrutiny to Thiel's "prophetic religious claims" to allow that bloc to identify and somehow resist this cynical and dystopian power-play.
Further details:
https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/1n9djkf/peter_thie...
As i say above the antichrist was on the way according to my parent's church a bunch of times in the 80s which is obvious twaddle. So either Thiel is a dilletant of bs because he's a moron (so why listen?) or there's a hidden objective.
Does he not need Yiannopoulos style conversion therapy first?
The title is "the devil's best trick" and the premise is that the satan has tricked us into no longer believing in supernatural evil.
I personally don't believe in god and supernatural evil but this book has given me nightmares which is something I haven't experienced for decades.
Also, if you think about it, the Chinese, Hindi, you Americans themselves from Canada to the Patagonia, Japanese.. didn't know about Jesus for millenia and they it did pretty fine without any major issues.
Only if you're a biblical literalist, which was not popular until the massive growth of Protestantism (and I suspect you'd be hard pressed to find a biblical literalist Quaker).
500 years ago these people would be burnt at the stake in seconds... jk.
If any, Hispanic cultures from Catholic backgrounds are ideologically far more Christian (the society comes first, the individual are struggles are secondary, community bound families and friends...) than any mega-selfish Evangelical cult idolizing money. Inb4 'The Vatican it's loaded' yes, we know it, but the closest members to the society are far more humble than these wackos holding millions in megachurches.
I'm not a Catholic myself but of course I'm a cultural byproduct of it.
This anthropologist spoke before the UN about Islamic radicalization. It's not hard to see that the same sort of radicalization happened to white men in the US, and Europe for that matter (those poor poor "victims" /s): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlbirlSA-dc
One of these things is not like the others. One of these things just doesn't belong. Can you tell which thing is not like the others by the time I finish my song?
I don't know if the error is yours or theirs, but Latinos are by and large Christian.
"Perhaps we should fear the Antichrist, perhaps we should fear the one-world totalitarian state more than Armageddon."
A prerequisite for antichrist is a world without boundaries: moral or territorial. The Thiel's totalitarian state. The nature of antichrist can be understood if we look at what Christianity and other major religions are all about: ungluing ourselves from things, desires and thoughts of this world and transcending to the kingdom of heaven. Anti-religions will teach the opposite: to glue ourselves to shiny things, to lose ourselves in desires and to marvel at the depths of demonic thought. Antichrist, if it comes, will be a living example of these three aspects: his body will be nearly indestructible, his desires will transcend our imagination and his brain will be a demonic mastermind, probably powered by some Al chip. Right now there are no technologies to create such a thing.
As for why Thiel is so bothered with this topic, I think it's because he's knowingly or unknowingly serving the powers that want this future to come true. His mental proximity to their headquarters is what gives him insights, in other words.
I'd be rare though possible (maybe Bertrand Russell as an example) to have good character without having been first taught from a religion sharing the old testament (in the west) or say bhuddism elsewhere.
Although as I write above particularly with the literal interpretation of the Bible which leads to bad outcomes, I'm not keen to dismiss religion. That's too much.
However it's too much to suggest atheists or agnostic or those who take the Bible more at arms length are just about getting laid, cash, and cars. The basic American character appeals to some charity, being straight with people, hard work, and being competent at something. Family counts too.
To the degree it's american its just as likely as being fairly universal no doubt with local areas of emphasis.
Of course there are live for today jerks, however, that same character compels us to do the right thing anyway.
Maybe he's annoyed since, he knows _he's_ actually the antichrist?
Personally, I'm an evangelical... an evangelical atheist. I always try to spread the good word that there is no invisible guy in outer space overlooking the human race. We're on our own here.
So, in spite of the fact that I believe the bible is an historical tale of incest and murder, with no more factual information than Pulp Fiction, I do actually believe one part of it is true:
Christians will start to follow false prophets, and they'll all go to hell.
Through my teens there were three distinct e.g. during AIDs onset for one my parent's church pushed the second coming as imminent which meant there was triple emphasis on being saved ... man oh man what an emotional and intellectually distorting time that was.
I ended church by 17 and never looked back.
Extended focus in that mind set also tends to lead to a kind of short-termism: if God is going enact the final judgement why bother about tomorrow? It is a very, very strange business to live through.
And that was instantly bursted.
With ONE word.
And opposition was like some unarmed but saint peoples on the ponies. Almoust ;) With a Leader.
Just read that Apocalipse chapter sentence or two longer !
And trust in God. "Only God know when end is coming".
Don't be Warhammer 40k brain-dead and ego buffed _permament_ agressor. Beliver or not.
The author loses the high-ground where he frames it as a kind of irrational hysteria. It isn't that the satanic panic wasn't irrational, but that the partisan media's framing of their opponents is generally irrational. I kind of checked out where he invoked national socialism.
Introspective analysis would go much further here. A movement that constantly berates the out-group, while celebrating themselves and the inclusive and tolerant ones - The hypocrisy is the least of the problems. The impotence is more off-putting.
There's very little these partisan journos can do to change their opponents, who have tuned them out completely. There's little or nothing they can do to reform their own positions or methods while they claim the mantle of righteousness. What's left is doubling down on even more partisan zealotry.
It doesn't inform us. It divides us.
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/hGwAohPbwCrDT5ynY/...
There's obviously a lot to unpack, but IMO the buried lede - the new idea Thiel is trying to push - is that the "antichrist" wants to regulate AI.
This is of course a persuasion effort by Thiel that tries to do a few things - I don't have a personal opinion, but speculating I assume Thiel is trying to get ahead of something here. We haven't really seen a regulatory push in the mainstream _yet_. On the contrary, there has been a number of legal exemptions. I would bet (60/40) that in the near future we'll see "AI regulation" become a pertinent topic of mainstream discourse.
I knew a guy who, hitting fifty or so, with more time on his hands, got really into collecting the wrappers of "Tunnock's Tea Cakes", which are a confectionary product housed in elegant gold packaging. Other people get into horse racing, or MLM scams, or - very, very frequently - history.
It is interesting that Thiel has become more interested in 'the antichrist', given a lot of people would cast him as such. But if I was a billionaire, and my new hobby was religious history - particularly the idea of "the antichrist" - there is absolutely no way I wouldn't be using my money to hold conferences about it and shit like that. I mean, wouldn't you, about your thing, were you a billionaire? He's a gigantic nerd like the rest of us.
Maybe it's an edgy, mid-life-crisis, "I'm so scary" emo pose - in a kind of Hot Topic way. Or maybe Thiel is actually the antichrist, or trying to summon him. Or whatever. But, usually, when a person does this sort of thing, it's usually just because they're interested in it and have the time.
You can take the bad-faith, more exciting view of it, obviously. Or - and this is arguably more embarrassing for Thiel, I think - see it as what it likely is: The hobby a middle-aged man might choose when his obscene wealth meant you would need a really, really, really large amount of Tunnock's Tea Cake wrappers - perhaps the whole company - to scratch the same relative itch.
9 more comments available on Hacker News