What Do You Think About the Huxley Godel Machine
Postedabout 2 months ago
arxiv.orgResearchstory
calmneutral
Debate
0/100
Artificial General IntelligenceGödel's Incompleteness TheoremsSelf-Improving Systems
Key topics
Artificial General Intelligence
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems
Self-Improving Systems
The post sparks a discussion about the Huxley Godel machine, a theoretical concept related to artificial general intelligence and self-improving systems, but the conversation is limited due to a lack of comments.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
N/A
Peak period
1
Start
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 19, 2025 at 7:15 AM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 19, 2025 at 7:15 AM EST
0s after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in Start
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 19, 2025 at 7:15 AM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45978658Type: storyLast synced: 11/22/2025, 12:49:10 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
my questions: - in the paper, it is applied only to SWE-bench, while it is said that it is extensible to other domains. what if the "domain" in question is arbitrary? do we construct our own benchmark manually?
- how does it hold up against OpenEvolve and Backpropamine? (it is my believe that Backpropamine shows actual plasticity, and not just in code; i.e. it is fundamentally different from HGM and DGM)?
- which one of these paradigms are more promising?