We Are in the Cancel Culture Part of the Tragedy Cycle
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
thefire.orgOtherstory
calmmixed
Debate
60/100
Cancel CultureFree SpeechLiberalism
Key topics
Cancel Culture
Free Speech
Liberalism
Article discusses the concept of 'cancel culture' as part of a tragedy cycle, with comments debating the implications and nuances of liberalism.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
2h
Peak period
1
2-4h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 12, 2025 at 2:54 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 12, 2025 at 5:01 PM EDT
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 2-4h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 13, 2025 at 8:44 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45225353Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 6:16:54 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
This article very rightly points out that Kirk has never been a liberal in the sense of really advocating for free speech but rather he’s mobilized the idea of liberalism to wrongly differentiate himself from campus illiberals who have notably given up on liberalism, the categorical imperative and such. Like
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Horowitz
would very much like to punish everyone who disagrees with him but things have gone so far with certain groups, particularly transgender activists, that it is easy to mobilize the idea of liberalism in service of an illiberal cause (notably: I see both Kirk and canceling transgenderists as more similar than different, Kirk can fool a lot of folks like Ezra Klein into thinking he’s better by mobilizing the idea of liberalism)
I dom’t appreciate “cancel culture” though in the title because it is a coded word.
But I've also never quite bought in to the idea that Charlie Kirk was a titan of free speech - it always struck me as a calculated, if sincere, way of capturing the illiberal nature of "liberal" campus politics. Of course, once the trap has been so obviously set for you, it's your own damn fault if you fall into the hole. You don't get to be violent because someone made you look foolish.
This editorial (like most things out of FIRE) was so intellectually on point that I found the conclusions challenging, even though I agree with them on essentially all first principles.
Lack of a united front on effective identity hacking is a yuge part what makes liberalism (& nominally liberal institutions) akratic, but that's another day's topic..