Vaccine Skepticism Comes for Pet Owners, Too
Posted2 months agoActive2 months ago
nytimes.comSciencestory
calmneutral
Debate
10/100
Vaccine SkepticismPet HealthAnimal Vaccination
Key topics
Vaccine Skepticism
Pet Health
Animal Vaccination
The article discusses how vaccine skepticism is now affecting pet owners, leading to concerns about the health of pets, while the lone commenter reflects on the parallels between human and animal vaccine skepticism.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
37m
Peak period
1
0-1h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 27, 2025 at 7:18 PM EDT
2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 27, 2025 at 7:54 PM EDT
37m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 27, 2025 at 7:54 PM EDT
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45727479Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 8:06:07 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Past that special bit of marketing, we’re also lacking in studies of dog/cat titers to have a good understanding of when/if booster shots are needed for animals. There’s a decent set of vets who believe it is a lot more like humans where it’s make it through the initial series and you’re good for life vs needing the yearly updates. Bordatella is likely the most abused booster with some boarding facilities requiring a booster every 6 months for animals while even the vets usually state yearly.
To be clear, vaccines are good and should be used. The unclear question is if they really need to be yearly for animals.