Using Fewer Syllables to Express Numbers
Key topics
The notion of condensing numerical expressions into fewer syllables has sparked a lively discussion, with some commenters finding innovative ways to rephrase numbers, like "two hundred ten cubed twelfths plus twelve cubed minus twelve" for 773466. As the conversation unfolded, musicians chimed in, sharing how they use abbreviated counting methods to keep rhythm, such as truncating "seven" to "sev". The thread took an amusing turn when one commenter joked about pronouncing "zero" as "null" to fit the single-syllable goal, while others reminisced about their experiences with complex rhythms in music. The exchange highlights the creative ways people adapt language to suit their needs, whether in math or music.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
3d
Peak period
35
60-72h
Avg / period
10.5
Based on 42 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Jan 4, 2026 at 1:15 AM EST
5d ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Jan 6, 2026 at 1:52 PM EST
3d after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
35 comments in 60-72h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Jan 8, 2026 at 6:14 PM EST
11h ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
As a musician, I frequently need to count to a rhythm, and the pesky number seven's two syllables throws my cadence off. So I count a bar of 8 like this:
> one, two, three, four, five, six, sev, eight
Occasionally I'll need to count up to as high as 16, which is especially tricky. It'd be easiest to do it in hexadecimal-style, but somehow I can't bring myself to count a part out as:
> one, two, three, four, five, six, sev, eight, nine, a, b, c, d, e, f, g
If only I could convince musicians to use zero-based indexing instead of one-based.
MAKE 7 MONOSYLLABIC
There is a lot of research that, in languages where the numbers have more syllables, native speakers have a harder time remembering sequences of numbers, because your brain has to store the cognitive load of saying it. So native Chinese speakers are much better at it than Spanish.
English is fortunate in in that all the digits are one syllable ... except for seven. If we could fix that, then we could cause a massive amount of good, when summed over all the times people have to remember numbers.
The good news is that we can promote this in a backward-compatible way, without having to coordinate in advance. Just commit to pronouncing 7 as "sen" (pretend you clipped the word as se--n), and eventually it will be the accepted pronunciation and codified as standard. As long as the listener is expecting a number there, they will automatically fill in the missing sounds and parse it as a 7.
Try it out some time! "Oh, there weren't very many, just six or sen."
Who's with me?
Anyhow, this discussion is moot as nobody is going to follow any proposal.
With respect, your comments read as ignoring all the points I brought up in in order to show off knowledge you're proud to have.
And saying "with respect" to make a disrespectful personal insult is just pathetic.
Going up to 16 would be pretty challenging though. OTOH, what's wrong with one and two and three and four and ...? I think we would did one eee and uh two eee and uh for 4-way subdivision, but I forget the triplet division.
The drummers all seemed to have a common syntax for different note length patterns without numbers, which you could probably drop in between numbered beats too.
Zero could also do with being a monosyllable, but at least we have “oh” and “nil” for that.
Then there are letters. 25 of them are monosyllables (though a few like “aitch” and “kyoo” cut it fine), then w (double you) is three syllables, and not even right, it’s double vee.
Unfortunately, once I mysteriously manage to right these two wrongs, power will go to my head, and I’ll go ahead with other spelling reforms and abolishing a few stupid letters like c and x and replacing them with others for all those poor fricatives that have been loaded onto -h digraphs.
And while all that’s going on, I’ll be learning Telugu better, and it will laugh at me with its average of 2.5 syllables per digit.
I also don't know any musicians that would count everything. I usually hear "and", "and" "uh", "ee" "and" "uh", etc. between the downbeats and numbers are typically used to count whole notes.
1. https://open.spotify.com/track/4TWzk0mTsVcwZRGkpoxjvG?si=vbK...
2. https://open.spotify.com/playlist/6UScdOAlqXqWTOmXFgQhFA?si=...
One, two, three, four, five, six, sev, nate
The ICAO phonetic alphabet specifically pronounces "4" as "fouwer", and "9" as "niner", so as to increase redundancy on a noisy channel.
> two hundred ten cubed twelfths plus twelve cubed minus twelve
Intuitive!
Here's a Finn counting 1, 2, 3, ... 87 (and ending in very Finnish way):
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/G57Zp7ZXYik