Us Stocks Fall as Bond Sell-Off Spills Into Equities
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
subs.ft.comOtherstory
skepticalnegative
Debate
60/100
Stock MarketBond Sell-OffFinancial News
Key topics
Stock Market
Bond Sell-Off
Financial News
The story reports on a decline in US stocks due to a bond sell-off, but the discussion is dominated by skepticism about the significance of the news and the link provided.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
8m
Peak period
11
0-1h
Avg / period
3
Comment distribution18 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 18 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 2, 2025 at 11:27 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 2, 2025 at 11:34 AM EDT
8m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
11 comments in 0-1h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 2, 2025 at 7:45 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45104330Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 5:54:29 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
https://subs.ft.com/products
https://www.ft.com/content/cf711815-09dc-4ef3-8bb7-de6b7cb1f...
Complex systems can be stable but close to collapse. Individually within we see stability and presume everything is fine while laughing at preppers. After a crash we can see all the signs that were there, and we retcon stories about crashes.
Complex systems seem to crash suddenly once a point of criticality is teetered over, where causes and effects that feed on each other driving the crash harder (positive feedback is not positive).
We retroactively create stories about dependencies (Archduke Franz Ferdinand).
Watching systems come back up after a shock is also weird (earthquake in my hometown Christchurch was a spectacular example of recovery).
Trying to diagnose how modern financial crises occurred is eye-opening.
Probably not.
Stocks are up ~9% over the last 6 months and are marginally off of all time highs.
Given that the prior for this is so high along with how many different beliefs there are about why the stock market changes, I'd say that there's a fairly low probability that any given news article's explanation is the real reason behind why it moved 1%.
Personally, I think it should be treated like a corporate press release: PR, maybe even a declaration of intent, but nothing (yet) of substance.
Note the change in the price of gold.