Us May Cut Air Traffic 10% by Friday Without Shutdown Deal, Sources Say
Postedabout 2 months agoActiveabout 2 months ago
reuters.comOtherstory
skepticalnegative
Debate
60/100
Us PoliticsAir Traffic ControlGovernment Shutdown
Key topics
Us Politics
Air Traffic Control
Government Shutdown
The US may cut air traffic by 10% if a shutdown deal isn't reached by Friday, sparking concerns about the impact on flights and potential compensation for foreign airlines.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
51m
Peak period
6
2-4h
Avg / period
2.6
Comment distribution21 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 21 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Nov 5, 2025 at 4:22 PM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Nov 5, 2025 at 5:13 PM EST
51m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
6 comments in 2-4h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Nov 7, 2025 at 12:43 AM EST
about 2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45828203Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 8:47:02 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
I have travel scheduled next week and I fear what this might do to my itinerary. Really hoping the Govt sorts itself out before then but there’s been almost no indication that is going to happen.
It’s also unclear what the actual definition of ‘cut’ is
Flight selection: It affects flights already in the system (filed flight plans), not future bookings. The scope is defined geographically all flights within X miles or specific air traffic control centers get hit proportionally. There's no inherent bias toward domestic vs international; if you're in scope, you're in scope.
What "cut" means: They reduce the Airport Acceptance Rate (AAR) the number of aircraft the airport can handle per hour. So instead of 60 arrivals/hour, maybe it's 54. Your flight gets assigned an Expect Departure Clearance Time (EDCT) basically "don't take off until this specific time" to meter the arrivals.
The system prioritizes keeping planes on the ground rather than having them circle the destination airport burning fuel. Late-filing flights (cargo, charters) get assigned the average program delay first, then compete for any remaining slots.
So if you filed a flight plan to LaGuardia and there's a 10% cut, you're getting a controlled departure time calculated by the Flight Schedule Monitor software based on your original schedule, airline equity, and current delays.
Of course, that assumes that this won't be politicked. I would not at all be surprised to see them kneecap NYC, Chicago and any other cities that are doing something the current white house doesn't like.
What does this even mean?
Which sounds kind of ominous but really, it's just the civil service.
While we're cutting budgets, I'd like to cut the budget for constant and unnecessarily loud sirens for emergency vehicles as well. "Oh great, there's another emergency.... somewhere..."
It is a shame that the EPA doesn't actually enforce any noise pollution regulations.
2 more comments available on Hacker News