Updates to Consumer Terms and Privacy Policy
Key topics
The debate rages on over Anthropic's updated consumer terms and privacy policy, with commenters scrutinizing the company's decision to make user data retention opt-out by default. While some, like dpcx and jkaplowitz, appreciate that users are being forced to make a choice, others, such as owebboy and roughly, are wary of the 5-year data retention and the likelihood that the opt-out feature will be eliminated down the line. The terms themselves clarify that users can opt out of training through their account settings, but some users point out that the settings pane is ambiguous, making it unclear whether users are opted in or out by default. As it turns out, the default is indeed "in," sparking concerns about the company's data handling practices.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
17m
Peak period
8
0-2h
Avg / period
2.7
Based on 24 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 28, 2025 at 11:59 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 28, 2025 at 12:16 PM EDT
17m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
8 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 29, 2025 at 1:44 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Like you, I would have preferred that the UI for the choice didn’t make opt-in the default. But at least, this is one of the rare times where a US company isn’t simply assuming or circumventing consent from existing users in countries without EU-style privacy laws who ignore the advance notification. So thank you Anthropic for that form of respect.
In this case, since the default is in unless you opt out, it's opt-out.
> We may use Materials ... unless you opt out of training through your account settings.
[1] https://github.com/OpenTermsArchive/GenAI-versions/commit/d8...
https://postimg.cc/2V7mM77C vs https://postimg.cc/1nF1HGzh
“Previous chats with no additional activity will not be used for model training.”
So, I guess they weren’t. You can switch off and keep that the case.
When you see this kind of thing it makes you wonder what else they'll try to do to get around your opt-out.
[1] https://opentermsarchive.org/en/collections/genai/
[2] https://github.com/OpenTermsArchive/GenAI-versions/tree/main...