Ultra-Hd Televisions Not Noticeably Better for Typical Viewer
Posted2 months agoActive2 months ago
theguardian.comTechstory
calmneutral
Debate
0/100
TV TechnologyDisplay ResolutionPerceptual Quality
Key topics
TV Technology
Display Resolution
Perceptual Quality
A study found that ultra-HD televisions (4K, 8K) are not noticeably better for typical viewers, sparking discussion on the practical value of high-resolution displays.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
2h
Peak period
1
2-3h
Avg / period
1
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 27, 2025 at 6:25 AM EDT
2 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 27, 2025 at 8:54 AM EDT
2h after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
1 comments in 2-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 27, 2025 at 5:32 PM EDT
2 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45719295Type: storyLast synced: 11/17/2025, 8:05:19 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Being able to see pixel-wide features isn't the point above witch nothing is gained, it's the bare minimum below which quality drops precipitously. In the least, you'd want to double that resolution, on each axis, to guarantee that patterns don't create quantization errors, similar to the Nyquist cutoff in audio. It's also worth aiming for at least the 90th percentile in visual acuity, if not the 99th, to ensure everyone gets the best experience.
Historically, good video quality has been expensive, but as the price comes down, there's no reason to not take advantage of it, just because some won't benefit from it.
Some people listen to music on their phone's loudspeaker, but that doesn't mean concert halls shouldn't aim for anything better.