Trump Family Has Made Over $1b in Profit on Crypto
Key topics
The Trump family is reported to have made over $1B in profit from crypto investments, sparking concerns about potential conflicts of interest and market manipulation, with commenters questioning the accuracy of the report and the implications for crypto regulation.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
6m
Peak period
9
0-2h
Avg / period
2.5
Based on 15 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 16, 2025 at 1:59 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 16, 2025 at 2:06 PM EDT
6m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
9 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 17, 2025 at 3:19 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
You need your head of state to be neutral in matters of business.
This sort of corruption is badly damaging the reputation of the USA
For the future, I wonder if it would be better or worse to eliminate almost all powers from the President's authority, giving him an elevated position mostly just in name, with most decisions being made by Congress. It has its pros and cons, but it's the safer choice.
There's a very common trend of a president campaigning on something and then never delivering as president.
I don't think we'd see much difference in terms of corruption though if Trump was elected by people or congress. The heads of agencies and etc were all confirmed by congress and those agencies are turning a blind eye.
Like the current congress could impeach him whenever they wanted. The fact that they don't (and voted for BBB) is enough proof to me that they'd vote him as prime minister.
He's actively distancing the US from our traditional allies. Tariffs undercut our trade partners. We're threatening to invade NATO countries. Even after 2028, our partners are going to have a hard time believing our commitments.
Compared to that, mere grift hardly registers.