Trump Administration Has Killed a Massive Solar Power Project in Nevada

Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago

sleepyguy

16 points

8 comments

theguardian.comOtherstory

heatednegative

Debate

40/100

Renewable EnergyTrump AdministrationEnvironmental Policy

Key topics

Renewable Energy

Trump Administration

Environmental Policy

The Trump administration has cancelled a large solar power project in Nevada, sparking criticism and concern among commenters about the administration's environmental policies and the impact on renewable energy.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Moderate engagement

First comment

25m

Peak period

0-2h

Avg / period

2.7

Key moments

01Story posted
Oct 10, 2025 at 11:59 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01
02First comment
Oct 10, 2025 at 12:24 PM EDT
25m after posting
Step 02
03Peak activity
6 comments in 0-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03
04Latest activity
Oct 11, 2025 at 8:55 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (8 comments)

Showing 8 comments

johng

3 months ago

3 replies

Is there any reason to believe this one would have been more successful than the one in California that lost a couple billion dollars?

dragonwriter

3 months ago

California has massive penetration of distributed solar to the point that solar supply exceeds total grid demand much of the time, making the marginal value of additional solar generation very low.

Which is a pretty big difference when comparing viability of utility solar installations in California to anywhere else in the country.

And I assume the particular California plant you are talking about is the big solar thermal/natural gas hybrid plant that was being built just as the big price drop in photovoltaics essentially made it obsolete, which barring unexpected breakthroughs on some competing technology, is a big difference from any not-already-obsolete system being considered now.

legitster

3 months ago

California is an expensive state full of people and bureaucratic red tape. Nevada is empty, most of the land is undesirable, and enjoys fairly lax regulations.

josefresco

3 months ago

Well for starters, Ivanpah Solar Power Facility was an attempt to build an innovative new solar design. Esmeralda 7 would have used now-dominant, proven, highly efficient PV technology. Apples and Oranges.

Oh and Esmeralda 7 would have been 16 times larger.

legitster

3 months ago

2 replies

> The following month, the president said his administration would not approve solar or wind power projects. “We will not approve wind or farmer destroying Solar,” he posted on Truth Social. “The days of stupidity are over in the USA!!!”

Excuse my harshness, but what a moron. It's literally free power from the sun.

I know that there's still lots of hydrocarbons in the ground still, but these guys know it's not infinite or free, right?

whatevaa

3 months ago

Infinite for the old guys. They will be gone by the time it is a problem.

rsynnott

3 months ago

But what if it destroys a farmer?!

iamhamm

3 months ago

Great news! Killing the Esmeralda 7 solar project is the right decision. People don’t realize how massive it was, over 110 square miles, bigger than Las Vegas itself. It would’ve scraped up pristine Great Basin desert, wiped out wildlife habitat, and trampled culturally important land not to mention diverting massive amounts of water which is a tight resource out here. Renewable energy is great, but we don’t need to bulldoze entire ecosystems to do it. Killing this one might actually push solar developers to think smaller and smarter next time.

View full discussion on Hacker News

ID: 45540426Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 4:26:23 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

Open link View on HN