Traffic Lights with Four Colors and a New White Light Are Coming
Posted3 months agoActive3 months ago
unionrayo.comTechstory
calmmixed
Debate
60/100
Autonomous VehiclesTraffic ManagementSmart Infrastructure
Key topics
Autonomous Vehicles
Traffic Management
Smart Infrastructure
The introduction of a new white light in traffic signals is being explored to facilitate autonomous vehicles, sparking discussions on its potential impact and implementation challenges.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
31m
Peak period
29
0-12h
Avg / period
8.6
Comment distribution43 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 43 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 13, 2025 at 8:47 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 13, 2025 at 9:18 PM EDT
31m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
29 comments in 0-12h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 22, 2025 at 6:20 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45574977Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 6:48:47 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
What about non-vehicle traffic, like bikes and pedestrians?
What happens when there is an accident. How does one argue they had right of way, when all the lights are white and everyone is just crossing their fingers and playing follow the leader?
Does this assume all autonomous vehicles are speaking the same language? Has that standard been established, or is this another format war that will need to play out?
Traffic circles seem like they would play out better. When autonomous cars meet they can negotiate things optimally, while normal cars slot in as they normally would with no change in behavior. Carmel, IN would be a good test bed for that theory.
I wonder how many millions of days humans sit in cars and look at empty crossroads and a red light.
The statement in the article is not conditional:
> follow the car in front of them (if that car is an autonomous one, it will know exactly when to continue or stop)
If the car in front of you is not autonomous, you're still supposed to follow it -- presumably, it's following an autonomous car further down the line. In other words, an autonomous car is responsible for stopping and starting human traffic behind it in the same lane, up to the next autonomous car behind it.
All the same, this sure does sound like it has a lot of failure modes.
According to one guy, the answer is "move fast and break things"...
It seems like the world is missing an obvious application for "AI". Every traffic light should notice a walker or biker, and signal them through their intersection without any manual steps. It would require that cars have lower priority than people, but this is already the case in many places, even if not implemented in a practical way.
This will be used as a special sign to indicate to drivers that autonomous vehicles are controlling the road at that moment. Today, traffic lights tell us when to stop or go on, but autonomous cars can communicate among themselves and with these traffic lights to organize the traffic flow in a faster and more precise way than humans.
in other words corporate interests cant develop a tech that works reliably so they take over a public chattel to change the standard for everyone so they can operate a weak tech development.
Eventually they will reinvent trains! (:
To my understanding the idea of the white light is that self-driving cars will at some point be able to coordinate well enough between each other that standard traffic control at intersections would be unecessarily inefficient - not a crutch to assist self driving cars' reliability in some way (it'd be a more challenging navigation scenario than just waiting). Don't think it'd work out in practice any time soon, though.
It’s already unecessarily inefficient! I can’t count the number of times I’ve stopped at a red light and waited for 35 seconds with no cross traffic only to be allowed to cross just as a cohort of 50 vehicles has to transition from highway speed down to idle. So much fuel and time is wasted due to bad arbitration schemes!
Not that we don't lose the plot sometimes too... there are plenty of light-controlled roundabouts near me. One has to wonder why.
Sometimes, however, the purpose of traffic lights is to keep the flow of traffic slower to improve safety for pedestrians, bicycles, and other drivers. Especially in down towns when it seems like the light cycles are specifically designed to thwart your desire to simply cruise through at the speed limit, that might literally be happening.
I don’t think “walkable” cities is an answer to anything. Walking is hard for children and the elderly. Public transit is SUPER slow. If cars fit on the road, then people will use cars. They are just a superior traveling experience in almost every way.
Walkable city doesn't mean you can't have a car, it means there are other (often faster) transport options and amenities within easy travel distance without a car. Children and elderly can still be transported by car.
We have a lack of imagination when it comes to cars. (That, and market-driven commercial interests.) "Cars, but electric!" to deal with climate change. "Cars, but autonomous!" to deal with...what? It's not clear what problem self-driving cars are meant to solve that mass transit couldn't do much better. And this idea of a white light is nuts, for the reasons others have given in comments. It just shows how far off the rails we're willing to go (pardon the pun) in attempting to stick with car-based solutions.
If we just take it as a given that we should allow autonomous cars to self-coordinate traffic intersections (a big if), this proposal still makes no sense. The traffic light is actively yielding control to the autonomous cars. In that case, just let the autonomous cars set the traffic signal appropriately.
You don’t need a “warning” light to tell drivers that autonomous cars are in charge. You need to set the traffic light to the right states. If you can’t do that safely, 100% you’re saying that you can’t let autonomous cars control the flow of traffic through the intersection.
This whole “just follow the car in front of you” directive is a poor attempt to handwave away human drivers. “Look, if we can just make the humans drive as if they are autonomous, there won’t be any issues at all.” It’s absurd and shipping a system like this would be criminally negligent. “Just follow the car in front of you” is not just a lazy answer. It’s nonsense guidance when you need to make a left and the autonomous car in front of you is going straight. “Oops. We forgot drivers sometimes need to turn.”
Currently with cars you need green-red periods. But some researchers are considering scenarios, where in the future the cars just reserve the intersection for a few seconds and then pass through. That would be a lot of flickering between green and red.
There are scenarios and simulations where they show that we can get a lot more (fuel and time) efficient if we just let cars pass by each other in these reserved time windows. In many of these scenarios cars just go over the intersection at full speed during their reserved time windows.
NOTE: I am just reporting on what I know other researchers are currently investigating and proposing. I am not saying I think this is a good idea. At least I would consider this a security nightmare, because hackers could very easily have cars crashing into each other at full speed. Also I would be very very worried passing through an intersection behind an autonomous car and just trusting that this car not only reserved their window, but also reserved some additional time for me.
Not just hackers. If we assume that cars would be weaving through the intersection at full speed, human drivers are going to do dumb stuff and cause high speed collisions. “Just fly through the intersection at 70 miles an hour… Follow the car in front of me… Make my left turn… CRASH.”
For that matter a dog running into the intersection is likely to cause a high speed collision. Implicit in the assumption that the time savings comes from this “fast flickering” and allowing cars to speed through the intersection in small windows is the fact that the safety margins are very small.
NC State University: “Researchers Propose a Fourth Light on Traffic Signals – For Self-Driving Cars“ (2023) [1]
> The researchers acknowledge that AVs are not ready to adopt the new distributed computing approach tomorrow, nor are governments going to install brand new traffic lights at every intersection in the immediate future.
[1] https://news.ncsu.edu/2023/02/traffic-light-for-autonomous-c...
If lights are out on a normal intersection, then it becomes like a four way stop, so I guess a confused driver might treat it as such, except there would be a lot of people following autonomous cars— in fact no non-confused human driver would even pause before crossing through the intersection. This would make people using the four-way stop protocol very mad.
All in all this sounds like a very dumb idea, even if the tech works perfectly, which it won’t.
Link to the start of where he starts outlining a path to dystopia (though the first half of the video is informative too) https://youtu.be/040ejWnFkj0?si=_RPIAzkW9LGBJmmA&t=1683
- LLM generated slop text: check
- AI generated ads: check
Into the trash it goes
Originally reported in Feb 2023 from the source [1].
And a link to the original paper titled: "White Phase Intersection Control Through Distributed Coordination: A Mobile Controller Paradigm in a Mixed Traffic Stream", also from Feb 2023 (may be paywalled) [2].
And previously discussed in Feb 2023 (1 comment) [3].
1: https://news.ncsu.edu/2023/02/traffic-light-for-autonomous-c...
2: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10038635
3: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34730399
Imagine busy road with a more rarely used side road. AI cars on main road will never give a green light to a human driver waiting to enter from the side road.
3 more comments available on Hacker News