The Us Population Could Shrink in 2025, for the First Time Ever

Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago

gamechangr

39 points

13 comments

derekthompson.orgSciencestory

calmmixed

Debate

60/100

DemographicsPopulation DeclineAutomation

Key topics

Demographics

Population Decline

Automation

The US population may shrink in 2025, sparking discussions on the implications of a declining population and the role of automation in the workforce.

Snapshot generated from the HN discussion

Discussion Activity

Moderate engagement

First comment

Peak period

0-12h

Avg / period

Comment distribution9 data points

Loading chart...

Based on 9 loaded comments

Key moments

01Story posted
Sep 2, 2025 at 9:21 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01
02First comment
Sep 3, 2025 at 12:19 AM EDT
3h after posting
Step 02
03Peak activity
6 comments in 0-12h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03
04Latest activity
Sep 8, 2025 at 7:08 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04

Generating AI Summary...

Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns

Discussion (13 comments)

Showing 9 comments of 13

riehwvfbk

4 months ago

2 replies

The point about housing is quite clearly false. There are around 147 million residential housing units in the US. And there are around 1.4 million built each year (this number fluctuates a lot: it was a third of this during the mortgage crisis, for example). But even if new residential construction is cut in half - that's a change of 0.5%.

It's all right to have an opinion, but it's important to realize when it's based on data and when on emotion.

actuallyalys

4 months ago

1 reply

The U.S. has underbuilt housing for some time [0], so it seems likely that cutting production in half would have a significant effect, even if it’s partly offset by lower demand in the form of lower immigration.

[0]: https://investors.zillowgroup.com/investors/news-and-events/...

riehwvfbk

4 months ago

1 reply

I think you hit downvote before really considering my point. There is simply no way that a change of 0.5% is significant - no matter your politics. Fluctuations of this magnitude happen with or without Trump every few years.

actuallyalys

4 months ago

1 reply

The relevant comparison is to annual construction, not the total inventory. Looking at recent data, variations of 0.5 percent (~700,000) have happened, but they were due to large shocks like Covid or post-Covid inflation.

This argument feels analogous to saying “there’s no way a granola bar can affect your hunger, its calorie count is negligible compared to all the calories your body has stored.”

riehwvfbk

4 months ago

A used granola bar cannot be resold. I hope. A used house, on the other hand, is perfectly fine.

So, apologies, but that argument is a previously used granola bar :)

gamechangrAuthor

4 months ago

Does those numbers take into account things like hurricanes in Florida?

g42gregory

4 months ago

1 reply

I don't understand. The leaders are telling us that, with the advent of AI, we are going to need a smaller workforce. Including in Agriculture, where robotics will play a role in force reduction.

You can't have it both ways: you can't be telling us that AI will force people of of jobs and we will need UBI, while decrying reduction in population.

hshdhdhj4444

4 months ago

Lots wrong in your comment.

1. Even if one assumes that someone claiming AI will reduce the need for workers decrying population decline is hypocritical, your complaint falls flat because you haven’t shown it’s the same people making the same claim. You’ve fallaciously used the term “leaders” to imply they’re a monolith but “leaders” almost certainly have different views. Some believe AI will reduce jobs and are not decrying a population decline while others believe AI will not reduce the workforce and are decrying a population decrease.

2. Of course one can decry a shrinking population even if one believes we don’t need as many workers. Heck, one can decry a shrinking population even if one believes the population should be smaller depending on why the population is shrinking and how much it’s shrinking.

For example, if the population is shrinking by 2% but if jobs will reduce by 1% that could be bad. If population is decreasing an appropriate amount, that could still be bad if it’s decreasing because of say a deadly pandemic killing people off. Or the population decrease can still be bad because the decrease is in the kinds of people the future economy needs.

3. Just because a smaller workforce is needed doesn’t mean a population decline is a good thing. If that smaller workforce can provide significantly greater output a larger population is a good thing so more people can enjoy the benefits of that greater output.

4. Finally, even if population decline is a good thing thanks to AI and the rate and nature, etc of the population decline is perfect it could still be a bad thing if the timing is wrong and the population decline happens way before AI starts killing those jobs.

metalman

4 months ago

the exact numbers and predictions are likely off by some amount, but the areas of labour and services that are bieng effected are correct, and are quite scary to contemplate. impacts to agriculture and building trades , trucking, could spill over, and see project set backs for everything, except, of course, the highest funded industrys. Hope you folks down there got some kind of, get down and dirty work your way out of trouble plan, you have been keeping secret, just might need it.

4 more comments available on Hacker News

View full discussion on Hacker News

ID: 45111228Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 5:39:21 PM

Want the full context?

Jump to the original sources

Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.

Open link View on HN