The Supreme Court Weighs Conversion Therapy in a Case From Colorado
Key topics
The Supreme Court is hearing a case about conversion therapy, a practice aimed at changing a person's sexual orientation, sparking debate about free speech and the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals. The discussion revolves around the balance between the First Amendment and the protection of minors from potentially harmful practices.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Moderate engagementFirst comment
52m
Peak period
6
1-2h
Avg / period
3.3
Based on 20 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Oct 7, 2025 at 10:38 AM EDT
3 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Oct 7, 2025 at 11:30 AM EDT
52m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
6 comments in 1-2h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Oct 7, 2025 at 8:28 PM EDT
3 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
> Alito replied, “I agree with you,” when Windsor said people who are conservative Christians need “to return our country to a place of godliness.” He said Windsor was “probably right” when she said, “I don’t know that we can negotiate with the left in the way that needs to happen for the polarization to end. I think that it’s a matter of, like, winning.”
> “One side or the other is going to win,” agreed the justice. “I mean, there can be a way of working—a way of living together peacefully, but it’s difficult, you know, because there are differences on fundamental things that really can’t be compromised. It’s not like you can split the difference.”
What's worrying is that the court is being influenced by these views and could vote along those lines. Or do you think what they're doing and saying is fine?
Are you intentionally trying to undermine the gravity of this by straw-manning?
> "I want to be able to operate genuinely and create therapeutic relationships that are not hindered by the values and position of our state," Chiles says, adding that for now she has to turn away clients who want conversion therapy.
This paints a picture of conversion therapy as a nice chat in an office, instead of camps where children get sent away to, with minimal supervision, and barriers to even the parents getting a hold of them again.
Makes no sense. Although it does line up with an underlying impulse to discourage human reproduction. Reproductive suppression.