The Onion Brought Back Its Print Edition and the Gamble Is Paying Off
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
wsj.comOtherstoryHigh profile
supportivepositive
Debate
10/100
The OnionPrint MediaSatire
Key topics
The Onion
Print Media
Satire
The Onion's revival of its print edition is paying off, with subscribers appreciating the unique reading experience and quality content, sparking nostalgia and enthusiasm among commenters.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Active discussionFirst comment
29m
Peak period
20
2-4h
Avg / period
5
Comment distribution65 data points
Loading chart...
Based on 65 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 21, 2025 at 6:28 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 21, 2025 at 6:58 PM EDT
29m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
20 comments in 2-4h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 23, 2025 at 1:53 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 44978869Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 5:48:27 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
Used to get handed a stack and asked to spread them around high school.
Years later uncle texts asking if I have weed. At the time yeah I always did. He says bring it to the Berrymore and I smoked up Tim, Eric, and John C Reilly like nbd.
Ahh the old days.
All the Big Ten schools that a founder who grew up in Indiana and Wisconsin cared about had it. Maybe even Ohio State. I’m not sure how far east it got back then.
(Also, UM has, or had back when I read it, the best school newspaper I've ever read.)
Oh wait what's that, I just went to wikipedia and I was correct in my assessment but also now it's independent? Shit I might just subscribe for the sake of it.
Back in 2000, I had a "100% travel" tech consulting job. My favorite part of the week was finally getting back home to Chicago, grabbing a sub at a sandwich shop, and casually reading that week's edition cover to cover Saturday afternoon.
One particular week, there was an ad for a local tech company (ThoughtWorks). I don't remember there being many tech job ads in the Onion at the time, so it stood out. I remember the ad copy being something like "Does your life suck, or just your job? Work here instead." I immediately applied, interviewed, eventually got an offer, quit my other job, and started at ThoughtWorks. It was a massive upgrade.
A few years later, I got to lead an internal dev team, and a spin-off project (Selenium) came out of that.
Long story long: No Onion, no job at ThoughtWorks, no Selenium.
Glad a new generation gets to enjoy leisurely reading fake news and seeing where it takes them in life.
skynet inventor credits dystopian fake news for inspiration to create dystopian reality
Selenium is useful beyond testing too.
I "optimized around" some tedious expense report filing a few years back with it.
Puppeteer was such a breathe of fresh air.
These days I write automated UI tests with barely a second thought. It has gotten so much easier.
It turns out it came out in 2004. I had no idea I was working with cutting edge testing software at the time. That also explains why it was so rough on the edges and there were so few resources to draw on to get it working better in edge cases. Although it was kind of brutal, I think selenium taught me a ton about asynchronicity and concurrency. That was probably good for my career
Puppeteer was such a breathe of fresh air. It supported waiting for element change instead of timeouts or polling
haven't used helium before.
That stack birthed almost an entire category of QA jobs.
And, meanwhile, South Park hasn't really evolved and misses the opportunity for satirical social commentary with less offensive, cheap shots rather than brutally criticizing and challenging the core flaws like idiocy, meanness, and selfishness of corrupt, hypocritical, and criminal political personalities.
i understand where you’re coming from looking at the most recent seasons, but this year has that humor bite that it used to have years ago. i’m not sure what they changed, but it really does capture the sassy claws it had in the early seasons.
it just completely slices up so many of the fantasy goggles so many people are wearing.
i can understand why certain cultish groups in the tech sphere are stinging though.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%27No_Way_to_Prevent_This,%27_...
Has it gone away from that?
The consensus is that's it's terrible try-hard partisan political satire? Can you go into more detail?
The parent comment I replied to is the first indication of any change I've seen since.
* You're reading in a linear format. Fewer distractions.
* No tabsplosion. No clickbait titles.
* Little to zero internet drama.
* You're leaned back on the couch instead of hunched over a computer or phone.
* You're closer to reading about a random/representative sample of what's going on in the world, as opposed to the "dog bites man" internet story of the week. Fewer breathless takes on everything.
The nice thing about a print magazine is that it actually does its job of giving you a break from your day, instead of turning into a distraction timesuck. It's easy to put down after reading an article or two that strikes your interest.
Unfortunately I did notice a bit of a slide in quality as The Economist started adopting the "shove our opinion down your throat" editorial style that's super common online.
Is the Economist still publishing a print edition? Barnes and Noble hasn't had a new issue since mid-July.
>Barnes and Noble hasn't had a new issue since mid-July.
Twice a year, during the summer and around xmas, they ship a really thick issue with lots of extra articles and then take a few weeks off. Perhaps this is their summer break?
That’s their intention since the beginning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_editorial_stance
I’m a subscriber for about 15 years now, and they shoved their opinion down my throat even 15 years ago. That didn’t change. Unfortunately, they are still better than almost anything else imho.
How do you rank the Economist, WSJ, Bloomberg, and FT? I view them as the big 4 English-language "serious investor publications" -- curious if you can think of others. (Generally I view investor publications as more incentivized towards accuracy. Investors will pay for information which allows them to make accurate predictions about asset prices. That's a better feedback loop for truth than most publications get. Lots of real-world events are reflected in asset prices.)
Even as a student newspaper it was remarkably funny
I spend more than half my day on screens. Sometimes it's nice to take a break.
https://membership.theonion.com/
Print goes back to considered articles for that point in time, limited ads that don't jump out in front of me and something that takes me away from a computer screen which is different. Sometimes I need different.