The First New Compass Since 1936
Key topics
A YouTube video showcasing a supposedly "new" compass design has sparked debate, with some commenters questioning whether it's truly innovative or just a tweaked version of an existing compass. While some defended the design as a legitimate improvement, others pointed out a suspicious edit in the demo video where the needle's movement is abruptly cut off, sparking concerns about the demonstration's authenticity. As commenters dug deeper, analyzing the video frame by frame, they noticed inconsistencies in lighting and reflections that suggested the edit wasn't just a simple video compression artifact. The scrutiny highlights the community's enthusiasm for dissecting and verifying claims, especially when it comes to novel technologies.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Very active discussionFirst comment
21m
Peak period
40
120-132h
Avg / period
8.7
Based on 52 loaded comments
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Jan 2, 2026 at 8:46 AM EST
7 days ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Jan 2, 2026 at 9:07 AM EST
21m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
40 comments in 120-132h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Jan 9, 2026 at 12:46 PM EST
27m ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
yes, everyone in this thread knows there is a mysterious edit and many are suspicious
It's been the source of a lot of headaches for me (specifically: windmill cogging), there is no way that that needle stopped in the way it did in the video.
The cut in the demo (12:18) is very odd and makes me wonder if it’s real.
It's far easier to just use a compass with a needle brake - manually dampen the oscillation using the brake (and let go to ensure you aren't holding an incorrect reading) and you get a reading quickly.
i do see the comments about the mysterious needle stop edit
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46462742
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26998308
1. A traditional compass is cheaper. They are so cheap they are built into the caps of ultra-cheap hiking sticks.
2. Traditional compasses don't need recharging.
3. Traditional compasses don't seem to be as easily fooled by stray EM noise. It could be the inertial dampening of the mass of the needle, but I've been in the woods where expensive electronic compasses misfired, but the old-fashioned one still worked just fine.
4. Dedicated devices have far lower usage hurdles. If I'm hiking, a glance at the top of my stick tells me the general (8-point) direction I'm going. An electronic compass at a minimum requires me to fish out a device and turn it on, or open an app.
5. If you aren't navigating by precise map measurements, all you really need is 8-point information (that is, "northwest" instead of 281 degrees). Needles in a circle are perfect for this; digital degrees are not.
I’ve watched this guys stuff for years, and was excited about this making it to the front page. Very disappointing.