The Climate Case for Planting Trees Has Been Overhyped – but It's Not Too Late
Posted4 months agoActive4 months ago
theconversation.comResearchstory
calmmixed
Debate
40/100
Climate ChangeReforestationEcology
Key topics
Climate Change
Reforestation
Ecology
The article argues that the climate benefits of planting trees have been overstated, but the discussion highlights the importance of considering the ecological and cultural context of reforestation efforts.
Snapshot generated from the HN discussion
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
12m
Peak period
4
0-3h
Avg / period
2.5
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Sep 13, 2025 at 6:14 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Sep 13, 2025 at 6:26 PM EDT
12m after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
4 comments in 0-3h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Sep 15, 2025 at 4:59 AM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45235759Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 6:30:43 PM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
But on some level you're right, "stopping deforestation" is an ecological goal that is valuable on its on and many of the ways to link it to climate finance don't really make sense. For instance you might take a flight for 4 hours that requires a permanent land use change, but the forest you protected might get cut anyway a few years later or burn down or maybe they plant a bunch of trees in the wrong spot and they don't grow.
As Israel is discovering perhaps there's a reason that these trees are not native - they are more prone to wildfires in the much hotter and drier middle eastern climate.
Maybe they are tree plantations, not forests, like in most of Europe.