The Case for Crazy Philanthropy
Posted5 months agoActive4 months ago
palladiummag.comOtherstory
informativepositive
Debate
60/100
PhilanthropyAltruismSocial Impact
Key topics
Philanthropy
Altruism
Social Impact
Discussion Activity
Light discussionFirst comment
3d
Peak period
3
78-84h
Avg / period
3
Key moments
- 01Story posted
Aug 28, 2025 at 7:35 AM EDT
5 months ago
Step 01 - 02First comment
Aug 31, 2025 at 5:09 PM EDT
3d after posting
Step 02 - 03Peak activity
3 comments in 78-84h
Hottest window of the conversation
Step 03 - 04Latest activity
Aug 31, 2025 at 7:24 PM EDT
4 months ago
Step 04
Generating AI Summary...
Analyzing up to 500 comments to identify key contributors and discussion patterns
ID: 45050908Type: storyLast synced: 11/20/2025, 11:29:11 AM
Want the full context?
Jump to the original sources
Read the primary article or dive into the live Hacker News thread when you're ready.
However, billionaires are more likely to buy a yacht than spend money on research that isn't immediately commercializable and directly connected to their business. You can find examples of billionaires spending money on unlikely research that actually paid off, but how much more fantastic research has failed to occur because of bad tax laws? i.e. When the Jeff Bezos' of the world pay less income tax than school teachers, the resulting loss of tax revenue starves publicly funded research.
Unlike the sexy and quick to gratify research a billionaire is likely to fund, publicly funded research can be long-term and curiosity driven, with no payoff in sight. This is the kind of research that lays the foundations for new fields.